 |
|
Jamison
|
|
I noticed that CTP2 have the boarders like SMAC, which I like. I don't know how many bugs are in CTP2, though. Seeing all the bugs in Civ3 makes me wonder if CTP2 would be a better buy. I do like the whole ability to customize your civilization via CTP2. But I like the graphics for Civ3 better. So all in all, which is the better buy?
|
|
|  |
 |
|
kimmygibler
|
|
If you get ctp, expect to download a lot of mods to even make it playable. The main problem is terrible ai. It was insane before the mods. Now certain mods have made the ai more aggressive, but not really more intelligent. Diplomacy was way more detailed, but again the ai problems pretty much ruined it. It was a shame because ctp had a ton of good features. (slavers, corporate branch units, abolishonists, public works, armies)
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
odisseus
|
|
Rome - Italy
Aug 2001 time: 05:16
|
|
IMHO, Civ3 looks better, but CTP2 IS better!
CTP2 is very customizable. The SLIC language is a powerful gift.
No script language in Civ3. Civ3 modders can change unit appearence, unit attributes, but not unit behaviour. CTP2 modders can do it!
If a Civ3 player want a new feature, he has to ask to Firaxis. A CTP2 player can implement it by himself or can ask to the modder community.
CTP2 is a better game!
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Ecthy
|
|
Zhonghuà Rénmín Gònghéguó
Mar 2000 time: 06:16
|
|
That's not true, Provost
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Ecthy
|
|
Zhonghuà Rénmín Gònghéguó
Mar 2000 time: 06:16
|
|
That's not true, Father Beast...
Yin has actually no idea what a civ game has to be like so it is futile to even consider his opinion
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Ecthy
|
|
Zhonghuà Rénmín Gònghéguó
Mar 2000 time: 06:16
|
|
you have no idea of what is good and what isn't
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:16. Apolyton Time is 00:16. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|