 |
|
jinif
|
|
Davis, CA
Sep 2001 time: 21:16
|
|
The two requirements are: Have a victorious Army, and have discovered Military Tradition. I don't know of any way to find witch city has small wonders though.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
The Eliminator
|
|
Eliminatorville
Nov 2001 time: 23:16
|
|
So after you build the academy, you have to have a victorious army, and THEN you can build leaderless armies?
|
|
|  |
 |
|
HalfLotus
|
 |
ATL, shorty.
Sep 2001 time: 00:16
|
|
Quickest way I can think is go to F1 screen and shift+click on build orders until you see the city that can build an ARMY.
Maybe sort by shields as its probably near the top of that list.
Last edited by HalfLotus on 24-12-2001 at 08:13
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Allemand
|
|
Olympia
Feb 2000 time: 05:16
|
|
I always rename my important cities. Military academy is called West Point. Then there is Irontown and Horseville. They get lots of protection.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Allemand
|
|
Olympia
Feb 2000 time: 05:16
|
|
Armies are good for attacking tough cities, and the AI is reluctant to attack them. The downside is they repair very slowly and they can't be upgraded with more modern units. It's a very expensive but effective way to make war.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
The Eliminator
|
|
Eliminatorville
Nov 2001 time: 23:16
|
|
Hey thanks Zanzin.
I really like Allemand's idea about changing names. Makes total sense!
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Bambul
|
 |
Sydney, Australia
Aug 2001 time: 15:16
|
|
I find armies very useful after I get tanks. Not for making tank armies though.
I put 4 cavalry units in each army, giving me a low attack (for the time), fast moving, hard to kill unit. I leave some Cav around as shock troops but armies really bring my Cav back to life, seeing as their upgradability stops there.
Plus, seeing as I would lose many Cav to attrition trying to take out Infantry/Mech Inf I may aswell put them into an army, give them a longer life span and increase their usability.
Finally, when they are of no more use to me, they disband for 50 shields a pop! Really nice for all those high corruption cities.
One more thing. Back a while ago I heard that leader-created armies would have special bonuses (I would have guessed higher movement, more HP, etc). It is obvious now that this is not the case, but had Firaxis ever stated that this was going to be a feature at any time in the past, or was it just me? Whilst I very highly doubt that it would ever actually become a feature, it would make leader created armies more powerful and be an incentive to do so over using leaders to rush buildings (especially so after your first army).
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:16. Apolyton Time is 00:16. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|