 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Sikander
|
 |
Boulder, Colorado, United Snakes of America
Jan 2000 time: 22:15
|
|
SMAC is better than Civ 3 in almost every way. Even the AI is good (I never thought I would say this!) in comparison when you consider just how much Civ 3 is simplified and forces you to advance along a very few 'tracks'. As for being able to use your imagination and create there is no comparison. Civ 3 has no design workshop, no crawlers, specialists aren't very good, etc. You end up playing the game very much like the AI does, and still winning handily. And while I don't much care about eye and ear candy in a game, it is worthwhile noting that SMAC kicks Civ's butt here as well.
I am the sort of person who much prefers a history type game to a sci-fi type game, so I didn't love SMAC instantly. But the game kept unfolding, so that my playstyle kept evolving to take into account the many things I discovered myself, or the huge number of things I learned on this forum. There is probably no game that I have ever played which has remained both interesting and fresh for so long as SMAC.
I'm taking a break from SMAC right now, and getting into Europa Universalis. It's a fun game, but the longevity depends upon the huge variety of situations you can start from more than different approaches to the game system itself. SMAC will occupy a significant place in my game rotation for as long as I have a machine that will run it though.
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:15. Apolyton Time is 00:15. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|