 |
|
Venger
|
|
Keeper of the Can-O'Whoopass
Jan 1970 time: 23:17
|
|
quote: Originally posted by techumseh
Test of Time is easily the most underrated game of the Civ genre. I was initially a critic, but John helped turn me into an ardent fan. The opposite process has occured with Civ3. |
Tecumseh -
I own Civ:ToT and have played it alot, what did you find in it that made you such a fan, from a scenario side? I never played scenarios, just the straight up game with my own special techs and unit mods.
Venger
|
|
|  |
 |
|
techumseh
|
 |
of the frozen North.
Apr 1999 time: 22:17
|
|
quote: Originally posted by MarkG
that was the doing of one man, not company policy... |
I'm not sure what your point is exactly. 
quote: Originally posted by Venger
I own Civ:ToT and have played it alot, what did you find in it that made you such a fan, from a scenario side? I never played scenarios, just the straight up game with my own special techs and unit mods. |
Up to 4 interconnected maps each with it's own terrain graphics and characteristics, animated units and terrain, vastly enhanced and enlarged events capability (for example, you can turn specific events off and on, use multiple triggers, etc.), improved AI, unbribable units, impassible terrain, invisible units, techs and units can be limited to specified civs, 81 unit slots, 100 tech slots, lots of old bugs cleaned up (you can now change improvements and production in a barbarian controlled city without the game crashing) and new things are now editable (helicopters pick up goody huts [y/n], lose X points for each betrayal. etc).
On the down side, there are no built in editors which means that scenario building takes more time. This, and the increased complexity, has meant relatively few scenarios have been produced so far. I've got several in various stages of completion, none finished except some converted from FW. (my new Russian Civil War scenario should be available for playtesting by the end of this week ) Kestrel has probably done the most with ToTs' potential. His and other scenarios are available from Cradle of Civiilzation along with some excellent scenario tips. Several excellent utilty programs have been produced which greatly enhance its' capability, including Angelo Scotto's CPSL program which is amazing and probably deserves a whole thread to itself.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Grrr
|
 |
of Hamilton, New-Zealand.
Dec 2000 time: 18:17
|
|
Consumers vs Corperation!
This is really a point of what INFOGRAMMES and FIRSUX (firaxis) will do and disable each other from doing, and as usual, us consumers are in the mid-ground of the battle, recieving shells from both sides, and help from neither. So eventually our only hope is for a few disentry employees of Firaxis to release the source code illegally, or make their own third party add-ons. I see no real hope that Firaxis will really GIVE US what we WANT, rather, they will CHARGE us for what THEY will GIVE.
For the time being, let's start making our own add-ons, stuff the license agreement.
Mine didn't have a scrollbar, so I could only read the first page anyway. 
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Civfan
|
|
Toronto, Canada
Sep 1999 time: 05:17
|
|
*bump*
|
|
|  |
 |
|
CharlesUFarley
|
|
Canada
Dec 2001 time: 21:17
|
|
quote: Originally posted by kittenOFchaos
Libertarian
I remember reading more than a few "suck up to Firaxis" threads BY you just after the release of civ3 until you found some other people here to emulate...unfortuantly some of your trash was deposited in civfanatics. |
I do it too. (suck up that is) it's sometimes the only way to communicate with them in a sort of misleading way in order to gain their audience for a duration long enough to suck information out of them. Ofcoarse we always have the smoking gun approach but they usually just hide from that!
Charles.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
CharlesUFarley
|
|
Canada
Dec 2001 time: 21:17
|
|
quote: Originally posted by MarkG
i dont know if you have realized this(after being explained several times by firaxians participating in our forums and chats) but Firaxis, as a company, has taken a certain (official) stance towards making specific promises or any kind of predictions of what they will do with civ3 in the future. so if you expected a "from the stuff you suggested, we will do #1, #4 and #6 in the next 5 weeks" response in your thread, you're out of luck.
on the general issue of improving customization abilities there HAS been a response, repeated many times. if you dont like the response that's a different issue
now if you consider the above post as "cheerleading", i'm terribly sorry for having a different opinion that you... |
I agree with Tech, and I believe he was stating that the response was un-acceptable but you obviously saw that. Not only was the response un-acceptable but it wasn't classified as any real response at all! Yes, we didn't like their response, and yes it bothers us, and yes we do honestly believe that if they expect us to show respect and patience they should do exactly that in return. Who will bend? I would like to think we already have Mr G.
Charles.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
CharlesUFarley
|
|
Canada
Dec 2001 time: 21:17
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Willem
If you had read this thread carefully, you would have realized that those are direct quotes made by none other than Libertarian. |
[...yawn...]
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:17. Apolyton Time is 00:17. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|