 |
|
ColdWizard
|
|
option 2 seems most likely (more money for firaxis and infogreed)
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Capt Dizle
|
|
If I were marketing Civ3 I would have opted for releasing a SP version, a multiplayer edition and a gold edition. This only makes sense. If Civ3 were in the same league as Civ and Civ2 then it would bear up well and everyone would get their moneys worth.
If you produce a great game you should make a pile, cause lots of games make little. The public should be made to pay through the nose for great games...otherwise their would be no reason for developers to knock themselves out trying to make great games. And no reason for publishers to risk their capital on games at all.
The problem here is that Civ3 isn't a good game much less a great one. Firaxis should take the heat for that, not Infrograms. IMHO.
I am waiting for a Big Huge Game from Brian. LOL!
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Master2000
|
|
C'mon folks. Do you really think that Firaxis will have the whole staff (could it be 40 people?) working for 4 months and then give the whole thing away for free?
If you do think so, don't start a company of your own, it would be a bad idea!
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:17. Apolyton Time is 00:17. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|