 |
|  |
 |
|
Marquis de Sodaq
|
 |
... no, a Marquis.
Jul 2000 time: 23:17
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Smash
Marquis de Sodaq-I want to post back in...oh..2-4 weeks of playing and tell us your thoughts at that time.
I think it will be most interesting. |
Maybe I'll get bored, maybe not. My life away from the pc only allows me an hour or so in a day, if that. 50 hours of fun would last me months... As I said, I'm not convinced it's a classic, that maybe in a half year I'll find it tiresome. I expect a working scenario editor will make it impressive for most anyone. Really, strategic resources, diplomacy (even tho I miss the spy and caravan units... ), and culture are cool additions to the civ genre.
I like the CivII combat system better, but have not minded the unbelievable result that crops up once in a million battles. CivII had that, too.
I don't miss fundamentalism at all. That gov't made the game far too easy in CivII. It allowed the player to sidestep any concern for happiness or science. That's half the game! I say good riddance to it as a gov't.
What many have complained about can just as fairly be seen as changes that add to the challenge. You wanted to win at deity by your third game? Too bad, they made a game that will take longer to master.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Libertarian
|
|
Huh? The only difficult way to win in Civ3 is world conquest at higher levels. But even then, the only opponent that will defeat you is the interface. So you lose. Interest, that is.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Ironikinit
|
|
Well, it's my experience that units capable of disengaging are pretty far from immortal, for the following reasons:
1. They don't retreat against other fast units.
2. They don't retreat when the defender is down to a single hit point.
3. After retreating they are easy prey.
If you feel that horsemen/knights/cavalry/tanks/whatever are too powerful, as I understand it they are easy to weaken with the editor.
Pardon me, simwiz, but why do you hold up a single one of frankdog's points while ignoring the rest? Invalidating a single point (which failed for the reasons I listed above IMO) doesn't invalidate the entire argument, no matter how many smilies you use.
Edit: simwiz, your signature is bull and you know it if you've actually played the game. Knights have always lost to tanks in my games no matter how good their terrain is. This whole "spearmen defeating tanks" line is a molehill posing as a mountain.
Lib, while you may find the game to be unchallenging (as unchallenging as you no doubt found Civ 2), a quick look through the strategy section shows that not many find it to be so easy. Personally, I find monarch level to be a pleasant challenge, and I can make it more difficult by handicapping myself (taking a civ I don't like, intentionally being a slowpoke, upping barbarian activity, etc., etc.)
Last edited by Ironikinit on 12-01-2002 at 11:19
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Libertarian
|
|
Ironik:
Yeah, I tried that sort of thing. Playing maps and civs I didn't like, and so forth. The effect was to end up with a game I didn't like.
Meanwhile...
Our Exile arrived. Sumptuous. Positively an object lesson in what interfaces are all about. Mystery and puzzle solving is fun, mentally challenging, and rewarding. And the interface is completely forgotten within moments, being, as it is, merely an extension of the gaming experience.
Playing Exile after fighting with Civ3 for months was like a cool balm on a searing wound. I like strategy games, but I think I'll wait for a good one. One that I can play the way I like and still enjoy the experience.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Ironikinit
|
|
Have fun, guys. I'm not big on mystery or RTS myself. TBS still rocks for me.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Marquis de Sodaq
|
 |
... no, a Marquis.
Jul 2000 time: 23:17
|
|
Thanks, diplomat. In almost every aspect of life, disappointment is due to expectations being too high, not because someone or something is at fault. The same holds true for a game.
(MdS watching for the tomatoes about to fly...)
Yes, Firaxis made promises that were not fulfilled, I'm aware of that. Even so, they are only a software programming group. If you expected them to deliver a lifelike sim that answered the requests of all, of course you are disappointed.
I'm not trolling with this thread, I just want people to sit back and appreciate the game. If you gave it a fair chance and still think it sucks, fine. 
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Libertarian
|
|
quote: In almost every aspect of life, disappointment is due to expectations being too high, not because someone or something is at fault. |
I've never seen a more gratuitous assertion. The counterexamples are too numerous to list. It is to laugh. Ha!
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Libertarian
|
|
quote: Well, list a few then. |
A man who examines the withholdings on his check stub.
A woman who meets the midget that had sent her pictures of his roommate.
A child who discovers that Santa Claus is not real.
An American who finally makes it to Paris.
A gamer who plays Civ3 to its ending message box.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Ironikinit
|
|
Stay on topic now. You'll notice that the thread is called "Civ 3 is GREAT", not "I'm a bitter bitter person who won't stop complaining somebody help me please."
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Libertarian
|
|
Well, I suppose that's another:
A person of dainty constitution who visits a thread and finds a view that opposes his own.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Marquis de Sodaq
|
 |
... no, a Marquis.
Jul 2000 time: 23:17
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Colonel Kraken
Now, MdS, you did know that you were simply inviting flame wars with starting this thread, didn't you? |
Well, by proclaiming that I enjoy the game, of course I knew the naysayers would jump in to disagree. However, it has also brought out an equal crowd of players who like it. 
Libertarian, if my statement about disappointment strikes you as gratuitous, then you apparently are one of those who don't understand it. More on topic, why on earth do you continue to post on this forum? If all you have to say about the game is bad, why are you even raining on the discussions? You've made it clear that you are unimpressed with Civ3. Do you need to repeat it hundreds of times?
Regarding the disappointments, the flip sides are:
He understands that most of what is withheld actually benefits him indirectly ( ... where did you get your handle... )
The midget turns out to be a good person, she learns to be less hung up on appearances
The child learns that his parents do even more for him than he thought
The american has good memories a very vibrant city
The gamer thinks, hey, that was fun.
It's all in how you choose to look at it.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Libertarian
|
|
quote: Civ 3 rules!!! All u have to do is compare it to civ2!! |
Uh huh. It also rules compared to stabbing your eyeballs with toothpicks.
quote: He understands that most of what is withheld actually benefits him indirectly... |
Then why not let him retain what he's earned so that it might benefit him directly? As it stands, the direct beneficiaries are those who populate the bureaucracies that suck up his earnings, keep a cut, and redistribute the remainder in accordance with what they believe to be politically expedient.
quote: where did you get your handle |
I oppose the initiation of force.
quote: The midget turns out to be a good person, she learns to be less hung up on appearances |
And deceit as well, I guess.
quote: The child learns that his parents do even more for him than he thought |
Right. Maybe more lies. Maybe they've lied about loving him. Maybe they've lied about how he should behave. And then there's that God thing.
quote: The american has good memories a very vibrant city |
Yeah. The smell of sidewalk unrinals, for example. Plus, fond memories of the undersides of French nostrils.
quote: The gamer thinks, hey, that was fun. |
I see. He studies the detail in the message box's texturized background and finds interesting patterns, leading to an inspirational epiphany and final enlightenment. Zat it?
quote: It's all in how you choose to look at it. |
I suppose you have a point. After all, masochists exist.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Dev
|
|
I played Civ1 for years and loved it.
I played Civ2 for years and loved it.
I've played SMAC since it came out and still love it.
I played Civ3 for a week and initially loved it for the new features, then I reached midgame and began hating it...and I still hate it.
No matter what Civ3 is to you then in my world it's a huge letdown.
I expected a great game along the same lines as its predecesors but got a game which I regret byuing even more than I regret buying SU27 Flanker back in the early multiplayer days for its advertised MP feature (on the damn box, no less) only to find a small note inside the box saying "No MP sorry".
/dev
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Brutus66
|
 |
Virginia
Nov 2001 time: 05:17
|
|
I must say that the exchange between Libertarian and Marquis has added some amusement in this tiresome, endless battle between the fanboys and the "whiners".
It seems that to Libertarian, the glass is not only half-empty, but the damn glass is defective as well, and the glass manufacturer should be investigated.
As for Marquis, I suspect that he is heavily dosed on Prozac. Somebody get this guy a lifetime membership to the optimist's society, please! He reminds me of the kid who got a ton of horse manure for Christmas and was dancing for joy, 'cause there had to be a pony in there somewhere.
Alll kidding aside, I think that posts insisting that "Civ3 kicks ass" or "Civ3 sucks" are both expressions of opinion and pointless. When someone says that the game has some problems, though, and proceeds to point them out, they should not be castigated as "whiners". If they are like me, they just want to get what's broken fixed.
I played a lot when Civ3 was first released and I got pretty disenchanted. It had too many glaring bugs to be considered a finished product- for example, my nuclear subs were getting sunk regularly by frigates. So I stopped playing for a couple months.
Now that the patch has been released I have come back and am trying it again. According to the list of fixes, the sub problem should be gone- we will see.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Marquis de Sodaq
|
 |
... no, a Marquis.
Jul 2000 time: 23:17
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Brutus66
I must say that the exchange between Libertarian and Marquis has added some amusement in this tiresome, endless battle between the fanboys and the "whiners". |
Well, I'm fine letting it rest. Such stuff is more appropriate for the off-topic, anyway. Two different views, two different people, no harm done.
quote: Originally posted by Brutus66
As for Marquis, I suspect that he is heavily dosed on Prozac. Somebody get this guy a lifetime membership to the optimist's society, please! |
Sorry, but no prozac needed here...
quote: Originally posted by Brutus66
...posts insisting that "Civ3 kicks ass" or "Civ3 sucks" are both expressions of opinion and pointless. When someone says that the game has some problems, though, and proceeds to point them out, they should not be castigated as "whiners". |
Fair enough. I don't think people are whining when they actually present a topic for discussion. There are indeed legitimate things to complain about, and they should be brought up. But it turns to whining when they just vent about what a drag it is, time and time again. Good luck with your subs...
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Marquis de Sodaq
|
 |
... no, a Marquis.
Jul 2000 time: 23:17
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Brutus66
I must say that the exchange between Libertarian and Marquis has added some amusement in this tiresome, endless battle between the fanboys and the "whiners". |
Well, I'm fine letting it rest. Such stuff is more appropriate for the off-topic, anyway. Two different views, two different people, no harm done.
quote: Originally posted by Brutus66
As for Marquis, I suspect that he is heavily dosed on Prozac. Somebody get this guy a lifetime membership to the optimist's society, please! |
No need for prozac, tho!
quote: Originally posted by Brutus66
...posts insisting that "Civ3 kicks ass" or "Civ3 sucks" are both expressions of opinion and pointless. When someone says that the game has some problems, though, and proceeds to point them out, they should not be castigated as "whiners". |
Fair enough. I don't think people are whining when they actually present a topic for discussion. There are indeed legitimate things to complain about, and they should be brought up. But it turns to whining when they just vent about what a drag it is, time and time again. Good luck with your subs...
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:17. Apolyton Time is 00:17. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|