 |
| |
|
| |
|
|
Lefty Scaevola
|
 |
San Antonio TX USA
Oct 2000
time: 23:17
|
|
PH got a ban for an sustained campaign of of many offending posts which included flaming, threadjacking, off topic, and trolling.
Boddington got a ban partly from that same campaign and from an subsequent campaign of attacking and trolling against a moderator, other percieved enemies, friends of the moderator, and the rules of the site, again involving multiple posts and warnings.
The assertion that either ban (or G's) was based on one particular post is a complete lie, and worthy of further penalty. Any assertion of innocent or good intent is a lie, they all intended hurtfulness and knew it would be disruptive. Subsequent to the first banning they campaigned, including PH from exile, and now Boddington from exile, against the site adminstration and site rules, again with maifest disruptuve intent; if they were actually motived primarily with amending a percived injustice, they would had done so by private communication. Public rant on such things never gets results; it always cause some level of disruption. With their level of intelligence, you must presume they intend the ordinary and historically established consequeces of their choice to public rant, rather than make private appeal whcih sometimes gets results. Their attempt to rant about G being priviledged and protected is a lie to deflect view from their own behavior. G has been punished and likely will be so again, just as these incorrigibles will likely be so again. red-jon is equaly guilty in both these disruptive campaigns, and likewise ought to have been banned, but seems to have escaped so far. (Maybe it is your BARRETT family connections that have saved you, dear distant cousin  )
All these manuvers by this clique are patently obvious, and do not require mind reading to detect. They are completely transparent despite thousands miles distance and cyber buffering. They are not fooling anybody but themselves.
I am having so much fun and self satisfaction as an volunteer prosecutor, that someone might want to ban me on the theory that it is sinful to have that much fun. Next time someone here plots a disruptive campaign, they might want to first get me on retainer$$$$$.
Last edited by Lefty Scaevola on 18-01-2002 at 21:30
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Lefty Scaevola
|
|
San Antonio TX USA
Oct 2000
time: 23:17
|
|
I am presuming that only lying to affect the adminstration or moderation of the site would be a potential offense. They should not worry much about how posters otherwise lie to each other.
Last edited by Lefty Scaevola on 18-01-2002 at 21:26
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
red_jon
|
 |
Uni of Wales Swansea
Oct 2000
time: 05:17
|
|
quote:
Originally posted by Chris 62
Hardy surprising.
Some day, I have hope, you will gain the maturity to understand about equitible punishments, and that in society you can't ever do what you want.
Spinky is very good at twisting facts to support his postion, but unfortunately, we see right through him.
As for your new hero worship of Spink,
Welcome to the darkside.
(That last part was really for MikeH, I'm still laughing about that!  ) |
I don't hero-worship him, I just agree with him (and PH).
And after your attack against my country, I tried to be rational, to which you just carried on, which is why I got pissed off with you.
Of course to the mods, I deserve a ban... 
|
|
| |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:17.
Apolyton Time is 00:17. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|
16-01-2002 23:21
|