 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
bartman
|
|
boston
Feb 2002 time: 05:17
|
|
pardon my intrusion, i am new at this. i read the whole posts, all of them, and i just cant believe it. no one has offered any proof, besides what some newspapers claimed, that the prisoners have been treated poorly. everyone who has seen them, including the red cross, has said they are doing allright. they are living better then they would have been hiding in freezing caves in afghanastan, starving to death while dodging bombs. they are being treated almost to the letter of the geneva convention, and the only real reason we dont wan't to call them POW's is because legally that would legitamize Al Queda, and thus we couldn't treat them ass a terrorist organization. So none of you people arguing about the poor prisoners has a point at all.
And i'd like the guy who wrote the reply to the moral relativism post, who said that we should not infringe on national soviergnety (sp?) even if they are butchering their people, because they have a right to enact thier own laws... that is moral relativism in the grandest sense. You can live with your guilt, knowing that you had the power to save millions of innocent lives, lives of women and children starved to death, raped and murdered, and instead decided to not help in the name of national sovreignity? you are a sad poor excuse for a human being. no notion of national rights should ever be more powerful then even one persons life.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
rah
|
|
Apolyton Prince of Moderators, Master of Reason
|
 |
Lord of the Ferrets
Jan 1970 time: 23:17
|
|
Ok, let's look at the U-turn in a slightly different light.
Q. Why didn't we do it in the first place.
A. Because we wan't to interrogate them.
We wanted to make sure we wouldn't be hampered by basic things like their rights.
We wanted to keep them around.
Now the interrogation part. We have already interrogated them. And with most intelligence, the more time that has passed the less uselful the info is. So we don't have to worry about that anymore.
We don't want to release them. We can sidestep this one and say we're at war with them indefinately. Or more commonly, just keep argueing definitions.
Their rights, hahahahahahha, the government has been trampling over rights for years and that's for citizens. Much easier on prisoners. Especially if you claim them as POWs so the focus is diverted. Americans have a short attention span, and they will be quickly forgotten.
In summary, since it realy doesn't make any difference anymore, we might as well get whatever PR we can get out of it. I must admit, since their change in status, I've seen like zippo in the news about it, (after the initial flurry)
RAH
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:17. Apolyton Time is 00:17. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|