 |
|  |
 |
|
kolpo
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Dissident
it has to do more than deaths. The U.S. never lost a single battle. Including the Tet offensive. All ground was retaken shortly after Tet began.
How can a country win every battle yet lose a war? |
Guerillia doesn't works with battles but with slowely weakening the enemy.
Guerillia doesn't have real terrirtory until the end of the war(when the enemy retreats), but they are everywhere and anywhere hidden in many places. If they by this are able to hurt the occuping force so hard that they retreat looks that to me like a victory even while it was not in an official battle but again guerillia, guerillia doesn't often use big battles.
Most people who fought there said that it was clearly a defeat and that they had no chance, that it was just one insane unwinnable mission, just like 95% of the historians.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Tingkai
|
|
To find the Northwest Passage
Aug 2001 time: 13:17
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Dissident
it has to do more than deaths. The U.S. never lost a single battle. Including the Tet offensive. All ground was retaken shortly after Tet began.
How can a country win every battle yet lose a war? |
Simple, the Americans did not win every battle in Vietnam. They lost numerous firefights on a regular basis. They lost the battle for heart and mind of the ordinary Vietnamese. They lost the battle for public support at home and abroad.
You also mistake, as do many others, holding ground and controlling it. The Tet offensive proved that the Americans did not truely control major cities in the south. After the battle, the American generals claimed victory and said they had wiped out the VC, but no one believed them because before the battle the generals claimed the VC was a spent force and that the south was safe.
It wasn't the media that turned the Tet offensive into a victory. It was the lies of the generals.
The main reason the war was lost was that the American public finally woke up to the fact that it was a stupid war. The US had no right to install and prop up corrupt, puppet governments in Vietnam. The deaths of thousands of Vietnamese and Americans was achieving nothing.
What has been forgotten is that the witdrawal of US forces from Vietnam was a victory for democracy. The American people forced their government to change its foreign policy and to end a war that the majority were against.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Tingkai
|
|
To find the Northwest Passage
Aug 2001 time: 13:17
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Dissident
well my argument is based on people who badmouth the U.S. military. The U.S. military could have continued fighting that war forever. As long as people are still producing children back home, the military can fight on. the military wasn't forced to retreat due to enemy opposition, but due to presidential order. |
That reminds me of the old joke that American soldiers never retreat, they just advance to the rear.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Tingkai
|
|
To find the Northwest Passage
Aug 2001 time: 13:17
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Rasputin
the president just enacted what the people wanted.. they saw the hell hole their boys were fighting in, the saw the body bags. If the same level of reproting was allowed with the same sort of visuals in WW2 or especially WW1 the USA would have pulled out of them too and left the Germans to win.
It was a lack of ability to keep taking losses (even though they were lwoer than their enemies) that cost America that war. IMHO |
IIRC, during WWII, the American government initially censored films showing dead American troops. But then FDR ordered that the films be shown to show the people the conditions that the troops were facing. Rather than discouraging the public, the images created even more support.
People will support a just war even if it involves high casualties, but not an unjust war or a pointless war.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
DinoDoc
|
 |
AECCP loves Democracy
Sep 1999 time: 23:17
|
|
quote: Originally posted by steelehc
Not quite. What about the Tet offensive? We lost that one. |
The 1968 Tet Offensive was a military disaster for General Vo Nguyen Giap and his forces. It only succeded on the only front that it was meant to, in the realm of American public opinion.
Re War of 1812: It really isn't accurate to say that anyside "lost" that particular war as no major military/terrirorial gains were made be either side and the major issues that caused the war were not settled. Stalemate would be the more accurate term.
Last edited by DinoDoc on 30-01-2002 at 20:43
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Viper2263
|
|
of Germania
Jan 2002 time: 05:17
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Harpax
Did you win World War II as well? |
I imagine you're not American and I appreciate your right to believe we did not win the war for you, however I only excuse it because you need the morale. If you notice no one entered on either side after the United States. Why? Because when we entered and flexed our production muscle and our flair for tactics everyone knew the war would be over and who would win.
Even after the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor, they knew it was over. Yamoto said "I fear we have awakened a sleeping giant."
*I apologize for that. It was rather rash. I'm just sick of Europe's feeling or remorse when we SAVED you. We couldn't have done it alone, but neither could all of you combined.
Last edited by Viper2263 on 31-01-2002 at 00:52
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Viper2263
|
|
of Germania
Jan 2002 time: 05:17
|
|
Technically Vietnam was not war. It was a "peace keeping action. Congress never declared war, therefore the U.S. economy never shifted gears. The United States is one of the most flexible countries in the world in that way. If Congress had declared war we simply would have produced Tanks instead of cars and trampled that d***ed forest with mechanized warfare. eliminating the gurellia's ability to fight effectively.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Maj
|
|
I suppose if one alters the conventional definitions of the words "won" and "war" then yes, you could argue that the United States did win the Vietnam War.
With that kind of wordplay, I could also argue that the White House is in fact a pink trailer.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Alephz
|
|

This thread is surrealistic.
quote: US, KIA-47,072
WIA-----313,616
NV, KIA-1,030,000
WIA------987,000
|
Afghanistan war:
15000 Soviet casualties
3000000 Afghan casualties
Therefore the Russians won the Afghanistan war, not?.
Sorry, Vietnamese pissed on the Americans. Bombarding from thousand meters is easy. It is in land, face to face, where it is necessary to demonstrate the valor, and there, a Vietnamese (or an afghan) is equivalent to ten Americans.
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:17. Apolyton Time is 00:17. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|