 |
|
CivilizationCanuck
|
|
Playing SMAC I loved how they had the different chassis for different units. There was infantry, rover, tank, foil, cruiser, helicopter, interceptor, gravship.
In Civ 3 I would think there to be different types of chassis', and probably more. Of course infantry, tank, rover/jeep would all be there. Along with Cruiser and maybe Battleship types, as well as the typical fighter types.
But what new ones would you like to see? I personally would like to see something a long the lines of air cruisers... or for that matter something like a Imperial Star Destroyer chassis... in future years of Civ 3.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
jdlessl
|
 |
Jacksonville, USA
Mar 2000 time: 00:12
|
|
Infantry: Foot soldiers with different levels of armor and weapons (bronze, iron, long bow, cross bow, etc)
Chariot: Obvious, but maybe change the # of horses?
Cavalry: Same options as infantry.
Artillery: Catapaults and Ballistas; what size ammo they fire, what the range is, etc.
We can either have a boatload of unit types cluttering up the build screen, or just a few of our own design. And I think you'll find the vast majority of people here prefered having the options to design your own units.
Furthermore, how much progress do you expect to see in the next 100-200 years? If the tech tree does go into the next century, I see no reason why colonization of the solar system should not be included.
--
Jared Lessl
[This message has been edited by jdlessl (edited November 16, 2000).]
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Tical_2000
|
|
I have one thing to say: Default Units Forever!
|
|
|  |
 |
|
zyxpsilon
|
 |
Laval,Quebec,Canada
Sep 2000 time: 05:12
|
|
Specialized UNITS is what makes them different from the others.
I stand for the DEFAULT civ2 styles >only<... adding chassis or shelltypes to THE tank, THE howitzer ,,, is useless. We don't want SMAC, Panzer4, XCOM6 or the likes; we like CIV1-CIV2 and CIV-THREE.
A spy might get a little bit more negotiation leaps, maybe?
What about a Stealth bomber loaded with laserguns and paperscrubs the pilot can throw out the cockpit?
Making it more complex at the unit level is like taking all the fun away.
Now... a satellite, a mech, or a deep/ocean glass-bubble sub... i can understand.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Biddles
|
 |
Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
Mar 1999 time: 05:12
|
|
quote:

Originally posted by Deathwalker on 11-17-2000 04:12 AM
I do not want chassis, they are crap. I don't want to design my own units.
 |
Ahh yes, another moron who didn't read the post three posts above his own, just came in and started bagging something because he didn't agree with the title.
quote:

Originally posted by Urban Ranger on 11-17-2000 02:41 AM
In SMAC, you don't have to use the unit design workshop ever. IIRC, that is 
So in Civ 3, you don't have to customise your units either, just use the default ones.
Somebody suggested that Civ 3 should allow a player to save the custom units separately to be used over and over again. That's a good idea.
 |
Hmmm....
I agree, with Urban Ranger. Have the unit workshop that pops up with the default units and if people don't want to use it they don't have to. If they do want to use it they can.
------------------
- Biddles
"Now that our life-support systems are utilising the new Windows 2027 OS, we don't have to worry about anythi......."
Mars Colonizer Mission
[This message has been edited by Biddles (edited November 17, 2000).]
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:12. Apolyton Time is 00:12. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|