 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
DanS
|
 |
Kickball Capital of the World
Jan 1970 time: 00:17
|
|
I'm afraid that we can't allow Iran to pursue nuclear weapons. In this instance, I would have my government strike as hard as possible and as quickly as possible to minimize the damage on all sides.
How can you allow Iran, who is all chummy with al Qaeda, pursue these weapons? Al Qaeda has shown what it will do, given dangerous enough weapons and we can't rest on the happy, but unrealistic assumption that they wouldn't use nukes, if given the chance.
This link was solidified in the US's mind by a personal envoy of the Iranian grand religious poobah giving explicit sanctuary to al Qaeda's leaders. The rest of this line of thinking is detailed here...
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dy...1-2002Feb3.html
I know this freaks some people out, but these weapons are just too dangerous to ignore. One nuke in NYC would set the US back a century. The Russians are uniquely situated to realize that we mean business, and understand that it all hinges on a perceived magnitude of threat that 9/11 brought about.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dy...9-2002Feb4.html
This is a highly volatile situation, because it is unbalanced. It is very difficult to know whether the perceived threat has any way of becoming an actual threat. If we have to break a lot of China in the process, then it's unfortunate, because it could have been avoided by these countries by making it crystal clear that they either aren't seeking nukes or that they aren't supporting terrorist organizations.
The Iranians should have known better. If you pursue this stuff, then it's a whole other ballgame. Haven't they thought through the implications?
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Khan Singh
|
 |
By means of the Internet, I am all places at once
Mar 2000 time: 00:17
|
|
I think he must be referring to poison gas, which was used, of course, by the major combatants in WW1. Only Germany deserves the blame for WW1 gas attacks though. You can't blame people for retaliating in kind (up to a certain point).
Germany and Britain both attacked each other's cities by air in WW1, though again Germany bears almost all the blame, as well as the blame for attacking French, Belgian and Russian cities.
In WW2, Japan, Germany, Britain and the US could legitimately be said to have used weapons of mass destruction. The Axis powers did use them first, but Britain and the US can not be considered blame free.
So saying the US is the only country to use weapons of mass destruction is completely unfair. Other nations certainly tried to destroy massive amounts of enemy civilians. They just were not very good at it. But they certainly have as much or more guilt than the US. In the case of the Germans a whole lot more.
Last edited by Khan Singh on 05-02-2002 at 04:20
|
|
|  |
 |
|
WFHermans
|
|
"Yes your Honor, I killed that child, but it was self defence because I am sure it was planning to kill me."
Japan and especially Hiroshima's 100,000 women and children were planning to use weapons of mass destruction against the USA, so the USA had to defend itself with a pre-emptive nuclear strike. Ok, you convinced us.
But .... isn't Bin Laden allowed to argue that those evil pencil pushers in the WTC were planning to attack him first? After all as Dubya showed a pretzel can be used as a lethal weapon. So a bagel must count as a weapon of mass destruction.
You clearly are suffering from an overdose of Hystery Channel watching,
|
|
|  |
 |
|
lightblue
|
|
L'Boro, UK
Oct 2001 time: 05:17
|
|
quote: Originally posted by WFHermans
You clearly are suffering from an overdose of Hystery Channel watching, |
And you have been taking too much acid, so we're all screwed. Good trolling though, it has slightly more substance than Wiggy, is not as irrational as Giancarlo and is not as screwed up as EvC's.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Djugashvili
|
|
by day, Cher impersonator by night
Dec 1999 time: 05:17
|
|
Maybe instead of bombing these poor middle-eastern countries with hardly anything to lose but human life, we should resort to fundamentally changing our foreign policy for the better, and eliminate the reasons behind their hostility towards us in the first place. Just a thought.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Rogan Josh
|
|
quote: Originally posted by DanS
How can you allow Iran, who is all chummy with al Qaeda, pursue these weapons? |
There you go again! Where do you get this stuff? Iran has been supporting the Northern Alliance against the Taliban for a lot longer than the US has....
|
|
|  |
 |
|
WFHermans
|
|
Thx for pointing out the difference between Iran and Qaida. The Qaida network (actually a loose group of mostly volunteers is actually chummy with Pakistan, a terrorist nations that is armed with nuclear weapons. But it's also a US ally.
FACT: As even CNN admitted, Bush has stopped an inquiry into 911.
FACT: The highjackers were paid by Pakistan.
FACT: Pakistan is a US ally.
THEREFORE.....
Close your eyes to these facts, mr Singh and the ret of the yahoos, go back to your ballgames and your TV set.
And wait for the next strike against innocent Americans.
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:17. Apolyton Time is 00:17. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|