 |
|  |
 |
|
JEEVES
|
|
LA CROSSE, WI
Nov 2000 time: 05:12
|
|
I propose getting rid of general maintanace costs and implementing funding. For instance, a library's effectiveness would depend on on the amount of funding. If it gets maximal (100%) it will be an excellent school, and enhance science production. If the school gets, say, 20% funding it will be poor and have a minimal effect on science. The same could be said for university, library, etc. There should be a minimal percentage for basic maintanace, but the rest of the funding goes to the quality of the improvement.
This would bring a welcome complexity to the game. It would make income and trade more important.
Another added complexity could be that of a localized economy. As in real life, high tech companies, need specialized people. In the game, a research center (or equivalent) could be built, but in order to run at peak efficiency, the city would need proper workers to work there. This is all of the top of my head. This stuff would bring some relief to the old basic system and equations.
I think the "rush buy" option should go. It doesn't make any sense. It isn't realistic at all.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
UltraSonix
|
|
Melbourne, Australia
May 2000 time: 15:12
|
|
There is absolutely nothing wrong with the suggestion - it's actually quite good. But I like the way Civ2 works now... it's very easy to manage.
As as to the percentage funding proposal - I think it's more Sim City than civ - it seems to be focused on the cities too much.
------------------
No, in Australia we don't live with kangaroos and koalas in our backyards... Despite any stupid advertisments you may see to the contrary... (And no, koalas don't usually speak!)
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:12. Apolyton Time is 00:12. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|