 |
|  |
 |
|
Teeba
|
|
I just headed over to the Simgolf website to get the patch, and what do I find in the forums but a post from Sid himself.
Yep, that's right, he's there, asking questions about what people want in a patch and generally showing interest in hearing fans' ideas. I still like Civ 3, but I'm sort of disappointed that while it seems so rushed and unpolished, Sid himself is asking fans for ideas regarding the SECOND patch for Simgolf. Uh-huh, he's talking about the second patch personally, (Simgolf is unpolished too, but more fun than Civ 3 so far) while we get no word about Civ.
I've seen a few people comment that Civ 3 is messed up because Sid was way more interested in Simgolf than Civ, heh, guess they were right. I used to chuckle at those people, now I have to chuckle at myself
I guess it's not a huge deal, but it is very disheartening.
I'll paste the post here for the morbidly curious, so you don't have to register and dig the SG forums...
__________________________________________________
__
Author: MaxisSid
Date: Feb-01-02 05:13 PM PST
Subject: Thanks, ideas for next patch, and question.
Wow, you guys certainly have a lot of well thought out suggestions for the game - I'm having
a hard time keeping up! I think this weekend we'll start to put together a patch which will
include the most-requested and easiest to implement improvements to the game. If you've
already posted your ideas on this BBS there's no need to post again, we'll review all the posts
as we put the patch together. Please understand that we can't include every great idea. We'll
definately change the 50 year retirement so that you can keep playing normally - perhaps
without updates to the Top 10 Designers screen. I'm guessing this should take about 7-10 days
plus testing time.
Question: In the demo the '+' gave you 10,000 extra simoleans, in the final game we took this out.
Should we...
1) leave it the way it is, no cheating.
2) restore the '+' key, cheating is an accepted part of golf! (I'll hear about that one)
3) allow the '+', but flag the game so that you can tell a cheat was used.
- Sid
__________________________________________________
__
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Teeba
|
|
Ahh, but Mark, I didn't comment on what Firaxis was doing. I'm sure that Jeff, Soren, Dan ect. want to make the best game they can, but that's not what I was bringing up... I just don't know what they're capable of/allowed to do at all. I do get the sinking feeling that they are capable of a lot, but not allowed to do a lot.
I was only talking about what SID was doing, and it doesn't seem to be Civ 3. Not to put too fine a point on it, on my game box, the "Sid Meier" part is above the "Civilization III" part, albeit in much smaller print.
BTW Why did you move this thread to some obscure forum? You don't think that people on the Civ 3 general forum would be interested in what Sid is doing? I mean, Sid is the most recognized and prominent name associated with the Civilization series after all... I'm sure Civ fans would be interested.
Maybe you're worried some serious Firaxis bashing is about to take place? 
Regards
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Capt Dizle
|
|
Nice try Mark. Still, you cannot change the fact that lots of folk are going to remember that Sid did nothing while the Civ series crashed and burned.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
MarkG
|
|
Grand Lord of Apolyton, Owner of all this land as far as the eye can see
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Field Marshal Klesh
It's just that I have never seen a post by Sid here. Markos, does he have a login? | no he doesnt. when he had something to say, he sent it to us via mail(brian&co leaving firaxis case)
if my memory is correct he didnt even have a login on the owo forums. i wonder if that means that he had nothing to do with smac as well? hell, if we follow this line of thought, brian didnt have much to do with the game either 
[serious mode=on]
the use of "Sid Meier" in all firaxis titles leads me to believe that firaxis has realised the marketing power of it. if you were Sid Meier, partially owning firaxis, with a history of 20 years making computer games, would you simply "not care" if the next game with your name on is rubbish or not?
as for the thread, when you compare two games, the thread belongs here
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Zealot
|
 |
Lisboa, Portugal
Jun 2000 time: 05:17
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Teeba
Ahh, but Mark, I didn't comment on what Firaxis was doing. I'm sure that Jeff, Soren, Dan ect. want to make the best game they can, but that's not what I was bringing up... I just don't know what they're capable of/allowed to do at all. I do get the sinking feeling that they are capable of a lot, but not allowed to do a lot |
I agree on this point. Civ 3 is (mainly, I think) Soren's baby, and I think Civ 3 is also Soren's first world wide published game, so I really believe that he would like to make the best Civ ever if he could! Give Civ 3 a break, will ya? Despite Civ 3 suck in several subjects, I have to agree that it's nevertheless a professional work, not something that a wannabe group of programmers/artists could do.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Teeba
|
|
quote: Originally posted by MarkG
no he doesnt. when he had something to say, he sent it to us via mail(brian&co leaving firaxis case)
if my memory is correct he didnt even have a login on the owo forums. i wonder if that means that he had nothing to do with smac as well? hell, if we follow this line of thought, brian didnt have much to do with the game either 
[serious mode=on]
the use of "Sid Meier" in all firaxis titles leads me to believe that firaxis has realised the marketing power of it. if you were Sid Meier, partially owning firaxis, with a history of 20 years making computer games, would you simply "not care" if the next game with your name on is rubbish or not?
as for the thread, when you compare two games, the thread belongs here |
Point taken, but it would still be nice if Sid were more involved with the community, although it's not imperitive.
See, sure Sid Meier would care if Civ3 were "rubbish." Trouble is that while it's a good game it's not everything most fans had reasonably hoped it would be. I would feel better about the future of Civ if it looked like Sid were more involved. Even if the Firaxis team made all the changes without Sid's input, having his power and influence more strongly behind them would help a lot. I'm sure that the money men at Firaxas/Infogames take Sid's word more seriously than they would somebody else's.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:17. Apolyton Time is 00:17. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|