 |
|
Christantine The Great
|
|
Massachusetts
Jun 2000
time: 00:12
|
|
Well, what do you think. Should Civ III use SE or use prepared governments like in Civ II. Here are some pros and cons.
Pros:
SE: Many combos possible; have a unique government.
Governments: Simple; civs cannot be better because of their government because the others will eventually catch up.
Cons:
SE: since Civ does not use idologies the civs might all use the same combo.
Governments: Absolutly no flexability.
Well?
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Christantine The Great
|
|
Massachusetts
Jun 2000
time: 00:12
|
|
BUMP
No one has any more to say?!?
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Psion
|
|
Maryland, USA
Jun 1999
time: 05:12
|
|
I'm for SE, as long as its better than SMAC's was. It should be more in-depth with more combinations and choices.
|
|
| |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:12.
Apolyton Time is 00:12. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|
27-11-2000 03:57
Of course it is many more important things it can be used to, maybe it could be possible to make our own economical systems!! 
Just think of a N O - M O N E Y - communistic-thougth-control government! 
|