 |
| |
|
|
=DrJambo=
|
 |
Athens of the North
Jan 2002
time: 05:17
|
|
What i have noticed is that all my Civ3 games follow a very similar trend and that is:
1. Build up cities with improvements and culture whilst keeping friends and trading with other civs.
2. Reach mid to late industrial period and run out of city improvements to build...
3. Build military as that's all there is to build.
4. Go to war in the Cavalry, Infantry, Tanks, Modern Ships period.
That always seems to be the way the games seem to work out! Going to war earlier means that the building of useful cultural city improvements suffers, i.e. like Universities, Police Stations, Banks, Wonders, Factories, etc.
What i have realised, is there is a significant lack of depth in the modern era! In the modern era, the main things that new tech brings are new and improved units and other mechanisms of conducting warfare. Also the spaceship comes into the equation a little on the early side, meaning that recycling centres, offshore platforms and the two wonders under Genetics aren't really worthwhile investments. Instead they just waste time.
Now, if i am not at war, my top cities have nothing to build because they have built all the improvements. Instead they just end up building units because there is essentially nothing left to build OR i set them onto wealth. Hence my point is that by this stage the best thing to do is just fight, fight, fight.
SO, how can the modern era be improved?
Here are my thoughts:
1. Expand the modern era making it larger with more tech advances.
2. Bring back improvements like stock-exchange, farmland, superhighways and SDI defence...
3. Make SAM batteries and Coastal Fortresses more useful by making the AI bombard cities as opposed to always bombarding land improvements, which are easily mopped up by workers.
4. Push back the timescale of the game beyond 2050 and make the spaceship parts arrive later.
5. Make aircraft able to destroy naval ships, thereby creating a need to replace a destroyed navy. At the moment once you build a navy that has got control of the seasthere isn't anything that can destroy it other than other ships or cruise missiles.
What ya reckon?
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Sir Ralph
|
 |
Long live teh Schwampel!
Dec 2001
time: 06:17
|
|
I would like the spaceship parts to be available not in the beginning and mid of the modern age, but as "future technologies". The space race comes ways too soon, often I don't even build/upgrade to modern armor and radar artillery, because the SS launch is close and there is no need to care about military. I also would like some more small wonders, kind of "Disneyland" (boost of happiness, zero culture  ) or similar, and I would like more modern city improvements. The mentioned comeback of the stock exchange and superhighways would be a good start.
Also it would be great to use the UN not only for electing the Secretary General, but I would like to have a living UN, that helps to solve wars and conflicts between other civs by embargoes and intervention, e.g. by giving a civ or an alliance the mandat to intervene in a conflict without a diplomatic penalty, and so on.
In current state, the game is a challenge in the ancient and medieval era, reaches it's peak somewhere in the industrial era and becomes a tedious pain as soon as the modern era begins... sad but true! It would be great to fix this tedium.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Ironikinit
|
|
There will always be a problem with improving the modern era, and that is the computing power required to track all of the units. Even standard maps slow noticably for me in the later game, so that I'm happy to take the early diplomatic victory.
Not that moving the SS parts to future tech is a bad idea. As has been pointed out, the idea of launching an interstellar colony with today's technology (or less!) is ridiculous.
Civ 2 suffered tedium in the end game as well. I'm not sure that bringing back the late game improvements that it had will fix anything.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Libertarian
|
|
If the cardinality of units is the source of tedium, why design the game such that they are integral to a successful empire-building strategy? It is like designing a motorcycle with seatbelts and an airbag.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Libertarian
|
|
By "constructive", do you mean "sycophantic"?
Or do you mean suggestions for improving the game, such as group movement, sensible unit activation sequencing, a more intuitive interface, access to the civilopedia from key strategic screens, a listing queue for critical messages, and other such suggestions that I've made repeatedly?
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Libertarian
|
|
The tedium that I experience late in the game is a direct result of fighting the interface (e.g., dismissing the Domestic Nag one city at a time) and the ill-conceived unit management features.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Ironikinit
|
|
Hey, at least we don't have to wait for the spaceship to actually make the trip anymore.
And we have the UN wonder right at the start of the era, which can make for a quick end, but not the highest scoring one or most certain.
It's a shame that we can't fast forward the game, that is, skip turns until something happens, such as a city running out of its build queue, a rival contacts us about something (be nice to turn that off because mostly they'll want trivial trades like map for map), a trade agreement ends, a wonder is built, etc.
It might help if lagging civs could get free advances to even things up, or if the AI was programmed to be more aggressive with espionage and steal more techs. As Jambo says, some of the AI tactics in war aren't terribly effective and could use tweaking. It could also help if (as has been suggested) the AI was given free unit upgrades. Another possibility would be to allow it to draft offensive units.
Some of those ideas might be terrible, just brainstorming.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
=DrJambo=
|
|
Athens of the North
Jan 2002
time: 05:17
|
|
quote:
Originally posted by Ironikinit
Hey, at least we don't have to wait for the spaceship to actually make the trip anymore. |
Actually sometimes that was exciting! I remember once being by far the biggest civ watching in triumph as i launched my spaceship first to arrive a "guaranteed" first. Only to find that some less well developed civ launched a bigger and better spaceship some years later which beat mine to it!!! Was a great twist to the so called guaranteed victory run-in...
quote:
And we have the UN wonder right at the start of the era, which can make for a quick end, but not the highest scoring one or most certain. |
Actually i love this new wonder... similar to above i was cruising to a points victory when in 2047 i held an election (shouldn't have in hindsight) and lost to the Ruskies with only 3 years left! Again a nice twist to the so-called guaranteed run-in.
quote:
help if lagging civs could get free advances to even things up, or if the AI was programmed to be more aggressive with espionage and steal more techs. As Jambo says, some of the AI tactics in war aren't terribly effective and could use tweaking. It could also help if (as has been suggested) the AI was given free unit upgrades. Another possibility would be to allow it to draft offensive units.
Some of those ideas might be terrible, just brainstorming. |
Yeah espionage is one area that is seriously lacking in Civ3. They've taken the thrill of running your hopeful spies around the map in an attempt to gain some vital leverage over a rival civ and replaced it it with a rather disfunctinal single screen system. This also gave another use for naval units, to transport your valuable spies across the globe...spying took some planning in Civ2. In Civ3, the build up is good with the Intelligence Agency and the potential options available are mostly useful:
1. Steal World Map is pointless.
2. Steal plans, investigate city and steal technology are good options albeit all too expensive. Cheaper to trade normally for tech anyways.
3. Initiate propaganda, too expensive and unreliable...better just to do it by force.
4. Find a mole!? This option is horribly implemented, usually leading to war and does the AI actually ever use espionage anyway (not that you would ever know)!? Pointless.
I miss the movable espionage and trade units, giving someone at peace something to do 
I have found myself creating outlaws (no-nationality swordsmen with Invention) to keep me entertained when at peace.
Any other ideas for fun units in the modern era to keep one amused during peace?
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Ironikinit
|
|
According to the manual, the AI is supposed to use espionage. As Ralph said, it does at least plant spies, but I've never seen a message that said "City X lost due to espionage" or "Civ Y's spy was captured stealing tech."
Jambo, yes, the space race could be exciting when one civ would launch a full SS looking to get all the points, then another would launch a stripped down one and beat the slower SS by a turn or two. Eventually I learned to watch out for that... but you should've heard me cuss when it happened. More than I cussed when freshly conquered cities flipped, anyway. That was more just bewildering at first.
Propaganda isn't totally useless, but that's not really on topic. Maybe espionage will be beefed up in the future, or at least options added to allow for that in the editor.
It's probably beyond the range of a patch, but Ralph's idea on the UN or another wonder that would allow for more advanced diplomacy would be cool. Also, if there were more ways to score points, something to work for, that might help. Of course, future tech is already there, but I've yet to get any. That's a change from Civ 2 where I often did.
Other possible units: AA battery you could park on your resources to attack bombers, modern armies that can unload units, infiltrators which would be units that appear to belong to other civs for cheap intell, satelites, I dunno what all. Adding units isn't easy, though.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
RickBlaine
|
|
I made similar points about the Modern era a couple of months ago. Not only is that era rather bare of techs and attractive wonders, the SS comes way too early and is way too easy to build. Unless you uncheck the SS victory (and I speculate that this is the most common victory path in Civ3), most of the already thin modern era becomes almost completely irrelevant. I emphatically do not want to join those silly posters who seem to think that Firaxis is the axis of evil (it's only a game, and a reasonably good one at that), nonetheless, the modern era gameplay suggests a real lack of play testing and a rush to get the game out the door for the holidays. At minimum, the SS techs should be moved to the end of the era, and construction should be more difficult (and, if possible, customizable) as in Civ2.
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
Arrian
|
 |
Kneel before Grog!
Jul 2001
time: 00:17
|
|
If you move the SS parts back a while, you had better make the rest of the Modern Age more fun. Most of us seem to beeline for the SS and just finish it off (substitute Modern Armor here for warmongers).
My suggestions, aside from the obvious (stacking, for instance):
Automatic, free AI unit upgrades (optional at start of game). Yeah, it's a cheat, but I think it's necessary. Optional so that those who HATE any AI cheat don't have to deal with it.
If possible, get the AI to disband units that don't upgrade to help produce better ones (ironclads -> destoyers, Cav -> Tanks). Or at least disband them so they don't have to pay the upkeep.
Reduce cost of espionage, encourage "aggressive" civs to use it more. Though I admit, I HATE it when the AI steals my tech (Civ II, MOOII). I'll deal with it, though, and I know it would make the AI more competitive.
Having the intelligence agency before your opponent has one should convey an added benifit, but I don't know how that should be done (50% boost to chance of success?).
If possible, having a spy in a civ's capitol should give a low percentage chance per turn of giving you the cheapest tech you don't have.
Remove SETI - once you are ahead, getting this is a foregone conclusion, and do you really need a third "doubles science" wonder? Bah.
Remove Longevity, it sucks.
Add a spacestation (either a 1-shot Wonder or a short series of parts), available after researching Spaceflight. This would give you the old Apollo Program clearing of the fog of war, and some culture, of course. Small Wonder, required for SS win somehow.
Add the Internet - gives a small boost to either science or money, but the major effect is halving the cost of stealing technology (edit: for all civs). Great Wonder, dead end tech off of computers.
If possible, change the UN entirely to function more like the one in Master of Orion II or SMAC. If you lose a vote, there should be an option to fight it out vs. the rest of the world.
-Arrian
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Feanor73
|
|
quote:
Originally posted by =DrJambo=
I have found myself creating outlaws (no-nationality swordsmen with Invention) to keep me entertained when at peace.
|
Can you explain what you mean by this? How does one create rogue swordsmen? Are they similiar to privateers [great idea, but uterly useless with attack of 1]?
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Ironikinit
|
|
Arrian,
Personally, I'd like it if the auto upgrade deal for the AI wasn't available as soon as the tech arrives, maybe more like at the dawn of a new era. That would give the AI all muskets and cav (most likely) at the end of the medieval, and infantry at the end of the industrial.
Since we're talking late game, the infantry upgrade is the biggie.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Arrian
|
|
Kneel before Grog!
Jul 2001
time: 00:17
|
|
Ironikinit,
I don't know that doing the AI upgrade by Age is good enough. It would still help a lot, but I don't think it will help enough. The AI needs to have riflemen ASAP, not wait to jump from Musketmen to Infantry upon hitting Modern Times. And what about Mech Inf? Sure, it will build some of the new units from scratch, but underneath it will still have the obselete ones.
Cavalry steamroll Musketmen, so that's why I think riflemen are important for the AI, not to mention turning their horsemen & knights into Cavalry (Far too often I've been hit with a counterattack which contained a couple of Cav, several knights, several horsemen, and some swordsmen).
Yes, I know we are talking about the Modern Age, but the first three Ages set up the Modern Age. If you can't just roll over the AI with Cavalry, you won't be as strong in modern times.
-Arrian
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Pyrodrew
|
|
I agree with most of the ideas here, especially about the Spaceship being able to be built so early. The United Nations should not be so easily built as well.
Yet, I believe there must be a balance of power for the game to be interesting in the Modern Age. If the AI does not team up against the player who is winning (usually the human), there is no challenge.
AI Civs 1st do not Despot Pop Rush like a human does, this cheap tactic starts to unbalance things.
Midevil Age is where the AI Civs begin to weaken. 1st comes the AI Civs HUGE desire to obtain any & all dead-end techs, which the Midevil Age has several. Even if these dead-end techs had their wonder completed the AI Civs will still sell their soul just to get 1. Likewise, why would a poor AI Civ (most AI Civs are poor) seek to get the Espionage (highly expensive tactics) tech instead of trying to keep up in other areas of the tech tree? It's foolish. This gives the human a good lead & game challenge begins to decrease.
Next, once Cavalry is introduced (usually the human gets this 1st) game balance is weakened even further (Cavalry Steamroll, possible by an AI, but a human does this best). As others have said, a 3speed unit who can retreat with decent stats can seriously give a player tons of land/cities very quick. Cavalry can be superior to tanks in some vital ways.
Once Factories are discovered (again, usually the human gets these 1st) then the strongest get MUCH stronger, widening the gap further. Factories should be weakened.
By the ModernAge, the AI Civs fear the strongest player (human usually) so much & are so weak compared to them there is VERY little challenge... especially since they don't seek a balance of power to stop the player that is winning (usually the human). Additionally, rather than the AI trying to stop the player that is winning & is in the lead, currently the AI only HELPS the strongest player destroy the other AI Civs (Feeding Frenzies). This reduces the challenge even further, making the Modern Age very boring.
Currently, only corruption is the only challenge in the Modern Age. And many people find the heavy distance corruption annoying. And there is very little strategy & ALOT of work just to get 1 shield up to 2. A balance of power would be a far more interesting Industrial Age & Modern Age challenge than Corruption.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Libertarian
|
|
A dead-on accurate analogy, Sandman. Thanks for sharing your thoughts.
|
|
| |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:17.
Apolyton Time is 00:17. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|
12-02-2002 17:57
. But the capability is there and I definitely intend to playtest it when I step back down to Emperor or Monarch.
|