 |
|
temacc
|
|
I took over a russian city and put about a dozen tanks and half a dozen infantry fortified in the city however it was right beside moscow the captial and after three turns the city desposed of my gov't and went back to being russian. What happens to all my units I had in the city??
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Dida
|
|
i think the units should not be killed, but rather sent back to your capital or something.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Shaka II
|
|
Or maybe 1 or 2 units could be killed in the revolt, with the rest expelled to outside the city borders. Or all units could be expelled to outside borders, but they take some damage in the revolt.
I like to bombard cities down below size 6 before I capture, so that a reasonable force can subdue the resistance, without fear of losing them all. If it's a size 24 to start with, then several turns may be required. I also like to give my obsolete units the garrison task and keep my good troops outside in case there is another flip. Eventually they learn that resistance is futile.
I don't know if there is a limit to the number of flips a city can make, but I think I have seen the same city flip twice. When taking over a bunch of cities near enemy capital, (conquering wave), I try to chase their capital away from recently captured cities to prevent more flips.
The best flip experience was when one of my native coastal cities (~ size 10) flipped to Chancellor Bismarck, but he didn't want it, so I got it back! I think that taught them a good lesson, but I rush bought them a cathedral, just in case.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Ironwood
|
|
Fresno, CA
Oct 2001 time: 21:17
|
|
The thing about culture flipping is that it's easy to prevent in *this* version of the game.
To take the example that started this thread, you had ten tanks in a city, right next to the capital. What were those tanks doing sitting in that city?
My next move would be to *immediately* move into the capital, taking it over. This would almost obliterate the risk of cultural defection.
Also, have you been ignoring culture at home? This is how I imagine cultural defection works in the case of a massive military force.
Your culture is weak; their culture is strong (they have great wen, you have little wen). Your military guys rush into the city, kill and rape and loot (since, in the case of attacking a culturally more developed civilization, your pool of potential military recruits is likely a bunch of worthless mother killers, and not virtuous professional soldiers). Then they settle in for garrison and head busting duty.
Slowly, they begin to partake of the great culture of this city, and come to admire the culture of the area. Some of them take interest in the other guy's rich history and philosophy. Others take local girls for wives. Still others might actually join the other guy's religion. Some remain loyal to you, but a split begins to develop.
The key thing to remember is that *none* of these guys joined because of a great love of the ideals they were fighting for. If they were that sort, well, they'd be working for the other guy. Some of them are mercenaries working for pay. Others are just layabouts with nothing better to do than loot. But, well, many of us older posters know the "civilizing" influence a good woman can have on a man. Old men with cool stories are almost as good.
The locals, of course, desperately want to be back under the rule of their beloved ruler (as opposed to the barbarian that rules over them now). This begins to infect some of the men. When the revolt breaks out, no longer are the lines drawn in terms of military units and foreign population. Now, it's just man, against man, against man. Probably a good portion of the revolting force are actually men who once fought under your banner.The others either die in battle, or slink away in shame. All desert your banner.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Ironwood
|
|
Fresno, CA
Oct 2001 time: 21:17
|
|
Yes, I have had a postwar cultural defection, once. It was really odd. One minute, I'm rushbuying all kinds of cultural improvements into the city of Babylon (I was playing the Chinese, and had removed the Babylonians from my continent, the only one on a tiny planet), the next minute, they rebel and rejoin the Babylonians! There wasn't a single adjacent Babylonian cultural border; the nearest Babylonian city was an island a good four squares offshore.
It was annoying, but I just sent riders south, to retake it. Declared war, finished them, finished everyone else, finished the game.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
panag
|
 |
MY WORDS ARE BACKED WITH BIO-CHEMICAL WEAPONS
Oct 2000 time: 07:17
|
|
well , you could prevent this , by putting one unit in town , or two , and put some units around the city , and if the city needs more "ground" put them on the land that they need , of course , this could mean war , but not allways ! , also , keep some workers ready , and let them join the city , that will do a lot
have a nice day
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
JFB
|
|
Piteå, Sweden
Jan 2002 time: 05:17
|
|
So, is it reasonable to think that a garrison can now somewhat substitute for culture-builds? (in the 1.17f build)
I'm just thinking that it can prevent reversion both ways, so one of your cities near enemy borders can benefit culturally from a larger garrison, not by adding culture but negating enemy culture.
If this is the case, it could help game-balance. I've lost cities to culture when I focus on military and lost cities to military when I culture-rush improvements. This way, you can maybe balance both better.
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:17. Apolyton Time is 00:17. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|