Apolyton Archive  |  Preserved copy of the Apolyton Civilization Site and its forums as they stood in September 2005. Read-only; nothing here can be posted to or replied to.  |  Forum index |  About this archive |  The 1998–2001 UBB forums
Today on Apolyton WARDELL INTERVIEW PROMO A.C.S. HISTORY CHAPTER 4 GET CIV4 /w FREE PLUS! A.C.S. PHOTO GALLERY GET A.O.M. V1.1
Apolyton Civilization Forums
main| civ2| civ3| civ4| smac| ctp2| ron| moo3| galciv| galciv2| alt| about|
ApolytonPLUS | register | search | faq | new posts | pm (-/-) | upload | members
hall of fame new! | civgroups | civgroups news | interviews | the column | radio | chat | directory | news | store | PLUS
Apolyton Civilization Forums : Powered by vBulletin version 2.0.3 Apolyton Civilization Forums > Miscellaneous > Archive > Civ3-General-Archive > Units, whats your thoughts??
Show a Printable Version | Email This Page to Someone! | Receive updates to this thread | Report this to Apolyton news!

bottom of page
  
Author
Thread    < Last Thread     Next Thread > Post New Thread     Post A Reply
Diablo, Bro. of Mephisto is offline Diablo, Bro. of Mephisto
Prince
Salt Lake City, USA
Oct 2000
time: 05:12
Question  Old Post 06-12-2000 08:59
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#1 Report this post to a moderator
Units, whats your thoughts?? Support Apolyton, buy Civilization: The Boardgame

I think the unit system in civ2 is extremely out of wack. for one thing, I usually get musketeers around 1 A.D.! second thought, I think there should be a much larger variety of units, different units would be used for different things, like the tank, would be specificly used in invasions, to lead armies, etc., and the marines, would be mainly used for guard duty.
3. the ranking system is way wrong, I mean, tell me, there is no sense in a unit being promoted to "veteran" status?? In real life, units (soldiers) aren't promoted to it, they become it with experience. I would like to see units have like levels, like in diablo, and diablo2, they could gain experience points, and level up, but no more then like, 5 levels, too complicating. I just thought I'd make this more easy, cause my last thread, Ranks in the Military, everyone jumped on me at the mention of officers, generals, sergeants, etc.

whats everyones thoughts?

airdrik is offline airdrik
Prince
Nampa, ID, USA
Oct 2000
time: 22:12
Post  Old Post 06-12-2000 09:31
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#2 Report this post to a moderator
Full PM-box? Change here!

quote:

Originally posted by Diablo, Bro. of Mephisto on 12-05-2000 10:59 PM
I think the unit system in civ2 is extremely out of wack. for one thing, I usually get musketeers around 1 A.D.! second thought, I think there should be a much larger variety of units, different units would be used for different things, like the tank, would be specificly used in invasions, to lead armies, etc., and the marines, would be mainly used for guard duty.


You don't know much about the US army system, do you? The marines are not the US guard, the National Guard is. The Marines are an elite group in the Navy, generally they are the first US force into and area, they go in, secure the area, and set up bases for the army and air force.
quote:

3. the ranking system is way wrong, I mean, tell me, there is no sense in a unit being promoted to "veteran" status?? In real life, units (soldiers) aren't promoted to it, they become it with experience. I would like to see units have like levels, like in diablo, and diablo2, they could gain experience points, and level up, but no more then like, 5 levels, too complicating. I just thought I'd make this more easy, cause my last thread, Ranks in the Military, everyone jumped on me at the mention of officers, generals, sergeants, etc.

whats everyones thoughts?


One question: You have a 3 up there, what happened to 1 and 2?
As per your ideas on units leveling up, I don't think that will go well either. If you have units leveling up, then that will mean that the generall development of advancing units would have to go up much faster so that, though a high level phalanx might be able to take on a mid to low level knight, it wouldn't stand a chance against even a low level dragoon.

Diablo, Bro. of Mephisto is offline Diablo, Bro. of Mephisto
Prince
Salt Lake City, USA
Oct 2000
time: 05:12
Post  Old Post 06-12-2000 09:36
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#3 Report this post to a moderator
Increase the size of your Attachments

I happen to know quite a bit in army stuff, I was speaking in the most general terms, and using terms from civ2 (the national guard was not in civ2).

airdrik is offline airdrik
Prince
Nampa, ID, USA
Oct 2000
time: 22:12
Post  Old Post 06-12-2000 09:48
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#4 Report this post to a moderator
Get a bigger avatar today!

I guess that you could call the national guard the infantry (a unit not in civ 2, but a very usefull unit, at 6, def 5, who cares about the rest, that bridges the gap between the rifleman and the mobile infantry). But anyway, we know what these units are supposed to be like, and really I think it unnecessary, as thats what most people do normally with those units (actually I prefer to just wait until I get the howitzers and 'blitze' everyone with the only unit 'immune' to all city defences).

Diablo, Bro. of Mephisto is offline Diablo, Bro. of Mephisto
Prince
Salt Lake City, USA
Oct 2000
time: 05:12
Post  Old Post 07-12-2000 01:46
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#5 Report this post to a moderator
Browse Apolyton AD-FREE

LOL! (laugh out loud), I love playing with my enemies with my *little* howitzers, Rather, I will change that to I love destroying my enemies!

Yeti is offline Yeti
Warlord
Wisconsin, USA
Dec 2000
time: 05:12
Lightbulb  Old Post 08-12-2000 02:55
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#6 Report this post to a moderator
Support Apolyton, buy Call to Power 2

Ya i missed the infantry units of Civ2 vs CTP

I'd like to see the partisan who is bad offensivley, but can ignore zones of control, move any three spaces, and had the ability to pillage.

The stack concept should be kept, as with the "veteran" concept without barracks.

One thing that would help the active vs reserve concept is being able to pick the units on alert status. That way you could save on units back home protecting that granery 5000 miles away.

It seems they took out the bite of the tank in CTP, and did away with all those cool infantry units. The tank should be bumped up and mech infantry with the same movement rate but less attack and better defense. However the tank terrain movement should be not allowed to pass mountains or rivers at all, (unless a road or better is there). Partisans could then be used to stop/slow a blitz, with yet another unit, (anti-tank infantry or unit, only really effective vs tanks) available to all civs once tank warfare is invented.

Another thing: minefields. Have a minelayer/minsweeper unit. Make it if you mine a city area square, you cant gain any resources from it.

Airfields: You should be able to airlift a unit from a city. You would have to name it tho so when the airport list comes up you know where it is lol.

Gotta keep the marines. Even though the largest beach assault in rl world history was done by the army

my 2 cents

yeti

Diablo, Bro. of Mephisto is offline Diablo, Bro. of Mephisto
Prince
Salt Lake City, USA
Oct 2000
time: 05:12
Post  Old Post 09-12-2000 01:25
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#7 Report this post to a moderator
Got spare money?

I love the mine-field idea!

I agree that there should be an anti-tank unit, that is especialy effective against tanks. Something like the historical vehical in WW2, it was called the Tank Destroyer. THey were major artillery/tank vehicles, that was vulnerable against infantry, but could take out any tank.

  < Last Thread     Next Thread > Post New Thread     Post A Reply
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:12.
Apolyton Time is 00:12.
    top of page
Rate This Thread:
archivepost
Forum Jump:
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
 




Contact Us - Apolyton Civilization Site - Support Us!

Building a better Apolyton through better information. Click here and take our poll!
Non-US visitors, click here!

Powered by: vBulletin Version 2.0.3
Copyright ©2000, 2001, Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.

Page generated in 0.0299 seconds (88.37% PHP - 11.63% MySQL) with 31 queries
Page Loading Time:

Support Apolyton: Amazon USA | Amazon UK | Amazon DE | Amazon FR |
Support Apolyton and get FREE PLUS, Buy from Chips&Bits: Galactic Civilizations | Galactic Civilizations: Deluxe Edition | Call to Power 2 | Civilization: The Boardgame | GURPS/ Alpha Centauri | Alpha Centauri | Civilization IV | Civilization III: Complete |


Front Page | Civilization IV | Civilization III | Civilization II | Call to Power II | Alpha Centauri | Master of Orion III
Rise of Nations | Galactic Civilizations | Galactic Civilizations II | Misc
Alt.Civs | Civ I | C:CtP I | About | News | Directory | Apolyton Store | Forums | Chat | Columns | Interviews | Newsletter
Scenario League | CSC | Clash of Civs | Spanish Site | CtP Maps | Cradle of Civ | WesW's Ctp1/2 Site | Civ3 Haven

apolyton.net | apolyton.com | civilization2.net | civilization3.net | civilization4.net | civilizationiv.info | calltopower.net | galciv.net | galciv2.net | moo3.net