Apolyton Archive  |  Preserved copy of the Apolyton Civilization Site and its forums as they stood in September 2005. Read-only; nothing here can be posted to or replied to.  |  Forum index |  About this archive |  The 1998–2001 UBB forums
Today on Apolyton WARDELL INTERVIEW PROMO A.C.S. HISTORY CHAPTER 4 GET CIV4 /w FREE PLUS! A.C.S. PHOTO GALLERY GET A.O.M. V1.1
Apolyton Civilization Forums
main| civ2| civ3| civ4| smac| ctp2| ron| moo3| galciv| galciv2| alt| about|
ApolytonPLUS | register | search | faq | new posts | pm (-/-) | upload | members
hall of fame new! | civgroups | civgroups news | interviews | the column | radio | chat | directory | news | store | PLUS
Apolyton Civilization Forums : Powered by vBulletin version 2.0.3 Apolyton Civilization Forums > Miscellaneous > Archive > Civ3-General-Archive > Things I wonder...
Show a Printable Version | Email This Page to Someone! | Receive updates to this thread | Report this to Apolyton news!

bottom of page
  
Author
Thread    < Last Thread     Next Thread > Post New Thread     Post A Reply
Heliodorus is offline Heliodorus
Chieftain
Colorado
Nov 2001
time: 22:17
  Old Post 13-02-2002 20:52
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#1 Report this post to a moderator
Things I wonder... Support Apolyton, buy Civilization: The Boardgame

An ad hoc collection of things I'm thinking about regarding Civ3 and the Apolyton community:

I wonder if the folks over at Firaxis think they made the game they wanted to make.
Civ3 was fun for me, but nowhere near the legend of Civ2. I know Firaxis had to be excited and enthused about the product as it left the door, at least on some major aspects. If i were them, I'd have been pleased with the AI's answer to ICS, and I'd have been pleased about culture, and resources. But I wonder how they felt as the first couple of months passed. Taking the blatant criticisms aside - I wonder how they look back on the design compromises that went into making a better AI. Do they have any regrets about those decisions now? Do they harbor some ill-will toward Infogrames regarding the rush that lead to shortened play-testing? Do they regret not having a truly public beta test (whether open or closed)?

Sometimes I make these long philosophical posts that I think or modestly ingenious, then no one has anything interesting to add to them, and I regret having exposed my designs on enlightenment. I wonder if that's sort of how Firaxis feels - regretting some of the efforts they went to, or some of the efforts they didn't make.

I guess I appreciate the human aspect of it all. I've always enjoyed designers who share public diaries related to design. I'd be interested to read some from Firaxis, someday.

godinex is offline godinex
Prince
because I'm the son of the King of Kings.
Jan 2002
time: 23:17
  Old Post 14-02-2002 02:13
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#2 Report this post to a moderator
Get a bigger avatar today!

Libertarian is offline Libertarian
King

Nov 2001
time: 00:17
  Old Post 16-02-2002 18:57
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#3 Report this post to a moderator
Support Apolyton, buy Call to Power 2

These are utterly fascinating questions and musings, apparently overlooked due to a timing coincidence with the release of the patch.

How individuals might feel is purley conjecture, of course, but it stands to reason that there might be a difference in feelings between those in upper management and the grunts — assuming that Firaxis is not somehow different from practically all other software houses.

I imagine that corporate officers were reasonably happy, since the game has sold relatively well. I imagine that stockholders were ambivalent, since net profits have been unremarkable due to heavy numbers on the expense side of the P&L statement. But I imagine that the grunts were like grunts everywhere: disappointed, not because what they delivered was not the best that they could do, but because it was the best that they were allowed to do.

Early on, developers from all departments were likely giddy with excitement as they reviewed their splash screens, their animated units, and the opening stages of gameplay in which Civ3 stands out as the quintessential strategy game. But, just like anywhere else, as deadlines loomed and administrative knuckles crushed the natural ebullience of the early days, I quite imagine that feelings of regret began to sink in well before the actual release. Regrets that the late game could not be adequately play tested. Regrets that compromises were made in the interface and in key areas of gameplay.

I can almost imagine the exuberance at the initial meetings where the idea of, say, diplomatic victory was discussed. A movie of the player walking into the United Nations, perhaps. Or a graphical representation of leaders voting, with insightful comments from each about the course of diplomacy in the game. Some indication, at least, of why one player won over another.

And then I can imagine the utter embarrasment that would have befallen any normal person when the realization came that nothing more than a popup message box would be offered, suddenly and without context declaring a winner.

I suppose it would have been less sad had it not come so close. Time will tell how far it is able to go.

Alex is offline Alex
Emperor
Brasil
Mar 1999
time: 02:17
Unhappy  Old Post 17-02-2002 02:07 Visit Alex's homepage!
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#4 Report this post to a moderator
Got spare money?

Helio and Lib: excellent posts, and ones that echo my own feelings and thoughts about Civ3 development.

Given some negative reactions here and on other boards, I wonder if they will look back at what they've done and think: now we have a chance to implement the things we had envisioned before... With the expansion pack, we could really make Civ3 the ultimate experience in strategy games... bring back the wonder movies, boys! Hey, you! Tell me more about your idea of a new government system...

But it won't happen.

jackshot is offline jackshot
Chieftain

Aug 2001
time: 23:17
  Old Post 17-02-2002 11:28
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#5 Report this post to a moderator
Support Apolyton, buy Civilization: The Boardgame

Yes, I think you are right. The biggest tragedy is that the franchise rights don't have any relationship with the guys who would tinker with it and think of it as their baby.

Which has probably been the problem all along.

  < Last Thread     Next Thread > Post New Thread     Post A Reply
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:17.
Apolyton Time is 00:17.
    top of page
Rate This Thread:
archivepost
Forum Jump:
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
 




Contact Us - Apolyton Civilization Site - Support Us!

Building a better Apolyton through better information. Click here and take our poll!
Non-US visitors, click here!

Powered by: vBulletin Version 2.0.3
Copyright ©2000, 2001, Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.

Page generated in 0.0333 seconds (87.96% PHP - 12.04% MySQL) with 31 queries
Page Loading Time:

Support Apolyton: Amazon USA | Amazon UK | Amazon DE | Amazon FR |
Support Apolyton and get FREE PLUS, Buy from Chips&Bits: Galactic Civilizations | Galactic Civilizations: Deluxe Edition | Call to Power 2 | Civilization: The Boardgame | GURPS/ Alpha Centauri | Alpha Centauri | Civilization IV | Civilization III: Complete |


Front Page | Civilization IV | Civilization III | Civilization II | Call to Power II | Alpha Centauri | Master of Orion III
Rise of Nations | Galactic Civilizations | Galactic Civilizations II | Misc
Alt.Civs | Civ I | C:CtP I | About | News | Directory | Apolyton Store | Forums | Chat | Columns | Interviews | Newsletter
Scenario League | CSC | Clash of Civs | Spanish Site | CtP Maps | Cradle of Civ | WesW's Ctp1/2 Site | Civ3 Haven

apolyton.net | apolyton.com | civilization2.net | civilization3.net | civilization4.net | civilizationiv.info | calltopower.net | galciv.net | galciv2.net | moo3.net