 |
Critics Are Vital to A Solid Patching Process?
This poll is closed. |
| Absolutely! Without criticism, even the sort that people might call 'whining,' the game would only marginally improve, if at all. Critics are Firaxis' life-line to a better product, like it or not. |
   |
39 |
35.14% |
| Hardly! Other than relying on the fans for the occasional hardware support problem, Firaxis is run by competent professionals who are more than capable of fixing problems and updating the game on their own. People who feel WE influence Firaxis beyond that are delusional. |
   |
6 |
5.41% |
| Depends: Firaxis clearly relies on feedback from the fans but will ignore anything that looks like 'whining.' The folks at Firaxis are only human. |
   |
52 |
46.85% |
| Rarely: Firaxis has its own agenda and will only occasionally let public boards like this affect their thinking...though it does happen on occasion. |
   |
10 |
9.01% |
| OTHER: Please explain... |
   |
4 |
3.60% |
| Total: |
111 voters |
100% |
|
|  |
 |
|
KoenigMkII
|
|
St. Helier, Jersey, United Kingdom
Apr 1999 time: 05:17
|
|
I voted for the top option: criticism is valid in general, in principle it should help.
But I sometimes think we fail to point out the +ves as throughly as we feed on the inevitable problems.
[I actually really like the interface + the advisor system, call me soft but I think Domestic advisor is helpful and kind of cute :-) ]
whats that THUD! in the background??
Pick yourself off the floor Libertarian! :-)
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Encomium
|
|
I resent your use of the term "whining" in the poll.
If everyone was as mindless and easily-pleased as some of the fanboys around here Firaxis would have no problem putting out shoddy underdeveloped merchandise over and over, besides not fixing what they got wrong in the first place.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Ironikinit
|
|
Well put, Grumbold.
Ditto.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
jackshot
|
|
quote: Originally posted by yin26
I submit that unless they actively tell us, we are BOUND to repeat ourselves and see the kind of whining we have seen. For one cannot simpy post a suggestion/criticism, get no official replies, and expect that the issue has been registered at Firaxis. Makes no sense. |
Why not? The discussions continue, they listen in and occasionally say something. So?
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Libertarian
|
|
I suppose I should say that, for the record, I agree with the statements that I've made.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
lawren8
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Encomium
I resent your use of the term "whining" in the poll.
If everyone was as mindless and easily-pleased as some of the fanboys around here Firaxis would have no problem putting out shoddy underdeveloped merchandise over and over, besides not fixing what they got wrong in the first place. |
Perfect example of whining -- more effort put into insulting people than into the content.
Direct thought out suggestions, complaints, and critisisms are helpful. Folks like you give the critics of this forum a bad name.
Suggestions - pull the insults out of your messages and see
if there's any content before posting.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Libertarian
|
|
Let's give that a try:
quote: Perfect ... people ... are helpful. Folks like you give ... messages... |
Yep, big improvement.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Sirian
|
|
Pennsylvania, USA
Dec 2001 time: 00:17
|
|
Everybody has their own agenda. That's life. Some people forward their agendas aggressively, and sometimes that pays off for them, sometimes it backfires.
If the guys at Firaxis didn't have a strong vision for what they want the playing experience to be like, the game would show this lack. That they are open to listening, to considering the feedback they receive, is good enough for me. I'm sure they realize that even the "whiners" care a great deal about their product, and take some comfort from that. They're still just regular folks, too, though, so I'm sure it bothers them at least on some level when people have unkind things to say.
Rebalancing and polishing a game this intricate is a tough, involved process. There are things that escape the imagination. That's where fans help a LOT, able (perhaps) to offer feedback in whatever blind spots the game designers may have. They clearly do value the feedback, and it definitely has some impact, but fans are as obligated (in a moral sense) to remain humble about their place in this relationship as Firaxis is.
To the degree that a few individuals get too emotional, either on the attack or in defense, this reflects more on them individually (IMO) than it does on the hosts of the forums. I know all too well how little control a forum moderator/operator really does have, as I've been in those shoes myself. The Pros at Firaxis are doing plenty right -- the best job I've seen from any game company in the last few years in patching their game and dealing with fans.
Good faith goes a long way with me. It's not everything, but it's the biggest thing. That's all I have to say for now.
- Sirian
|
|
|  |
 |
|
badassb
|
|
voted "rarely"
I've been reading these forums for quite a while. I have'nt really written a lot. Way back, when they were discussing a successor to civII, I read a lot of interesting things. None of it, really made it in CivIII. So, my conclusion: Firaxis makes its own game, simple and hououst.
P.S. by the way, I like civ III, I can play it for hours.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
DrFell
|
|
Yeah, without criticism the game would not improve at all, apart from a few bug fixes. You can see this with stacked movement, do you honestly think that would have gone in without people complaining about the time it takes to move units around? Or the weakened retreat. Constuctive criticism is vital for improving the game, all you whiner whiners do no real good at all.
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:17. Apolyton Time is 00:17. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|