 |
|
Diablo, Bro. of Mephisto
|
|
Salt Lake City, USA
Oct 2000 time: 05:12
|
|
I totally like the idea of a second battle map, I suggested it in my 'Combat' thread. I have not played, Shogun: Total War. or whatever the name was, but I have played, Lords of the Realm II. it is much like what you described, the actual game is completely turn-based, but then once two armies come to meet, then goes into a battle-map.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Rollo Tomasi
|
|
I'm not sure about this. This might be a good idea, as long as it doesn't get too bogged down in warfare. I don't want the game to become Panzer Commander-in-Chief. As long as it's optional, and it doesn't take away from improving diplomacy, economics, domestic affairs, etc. it wouldn't bother me.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Diablo, Bro. of Mephisto
|
|
Salt Lake City, USA
Oct 2000 time: 05:12
|
|
quote:

Originally posted by Rollo Tomasi on 12-20-2000 08:26 PM
I'm not sure about this. This might be a good idea, as long as it doesn't get too bogged down in warfare. I don't want the game to become Panzer Commander-in-Chief. As long as it's optional, and it doesn't take away from improving diplomacy, economics, domestic affairs, etc. it wouldn't bother me.
 |
Im exactly with you. although I still would really like to be able to command my own battles. If this improvement removes the upgrade of the diplomacy, AI, map, number of civs, etc, then I am like you, leave it out, the AI, diplomacy, units, etc, are much more important then battles screens.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:12. Apolyton Time is 00:12. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|