 |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
Alynzia
|
 |
Norwich City
Mar 2001
time: 05:17
|
|
Uh, what's heterosexual sex  ?
Abuse could come in marriage with sex on demand, the 'conjugal rights' (as copied out of the TV Times on today's page).
A woman will never develop cervical cancer if she remains a heterosexual virgin, so any woman who has died of cervical cancer may agree with the statement.
BUT
The more babies a woman has (lots of heterosexual sex usually there) the lower her risks of breast cancer. And since breast cancer kills more women I would suggest more heterosexual sex, hurrah!
I worry about heterosexual couples having anal sex, when it is the man using the woman's anus all the time because her 'woman place' is lax after childbirth. Prolonged and repeated anal sex results in anal incontinence, according to a number of sources, including Dr. Vernon Coleman. If he is being forceful for anal sex, that is abusive.
Anal sex is so gross, in my opinion after being sexually abused like that as a child. I'm sorry for putting anyone off. There are a few delicate young minds around. You have the right to do anything with your anus you want to.
Just to finish off with a quote from an American actor
'Women need a reason to have sex, men just need a place.'
Alynzia 
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
Blackwidow24
|
 |
and the center of your universe
Jun 2000
time: 05:17
|
|
quote:
Originally posted by Alynzia
Uh, what's heterosexual sex ?
Abuse could come in marriage with sex on demand, the 'conjugal rights' (as copied out of the TV Times on today's page).
A woman will never develop cervical cancer if she remains a heterosexual virgin, so any woman who has died of cervical cancer may agree with the statement.
BUT
The more babies a woman has (lots of heterosexual sex usually there) the lower her risks of breast cancer. And since breast cancer kills more women I would suggest more heterosexual sex, hurrah!
I worry about heterosexual couples having anal sex, when it is the man using the woman's anus all the time because her 'woman place' is lax after childbirth. Prolonged and repeated anal sex results in anal incontinence, according to a number of sources, including Dr. Vernon Coleman. If he is being forceful for anal sex, that is abusive.
Anal sex is so gross, in my opinion after being sexually abused like that as a child. I'm sorry for putting anyone off. There are a few delicate young minds around. You have the right to do anything with your anus you want to.
Just to finish off with a quote from an American actor
'Women need a reason to have sex, men just need a place.'
Alynzia |
After being sexually abused sex may very well seem that way and anyone who tries to use my anus for their sexual pleasure will have another thing coming to him. By the whay it is horrible when young people are miss treated in the way that you were, I really wish all those people would die and burn in hell..
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Flubber
|
|
With a view of the Rockies
Aug 2000
time: 22:17
|
|
A few points
1. There are abusive relationships and good relationships whether we are talking heterosexual, homosexual, familial or casual. I reject the idea that heterosexual sex is inherently abusive and my wife agrees. Its a mutual thing that occurrs when we both want it to
2. While any spousal support may drop sharply or be eliminated on remarriage, child support would be largely unaffected. Child support from both parents is the right of the child !! Canada has adopted a set of Child support guidelines which effectively set out he amounts of support a person pays for any given income. Deviations from this happen but they are infrequent.
3. The habit of using the radical element of a group to try to discredit the whole group is unfortunately common. An ex-girlfriend was upset to see that to join an association of female lawyers, she was expected to sign a declaration in favor of a woman's right to choose. The assumption was that, as a feminist, she must espouse certain viewpoints. The same thing occurrs when some feminists were critical of another feminist who chose to leave work to care for her child for a couple of years.
I always though the point was for women to have free choices and not to all aspire to the traditional male model. But what do i know ? I'm only a guy. . .
|
|
| |
|
|
|
mactbone
|
 |
Lift Your Skinny Fists Like Antennas to Heaven
Sep 2001
time: 23:17
|
|
quote:
It's a guy thing ... oink, oink
By Bob Halloran
Special to Page 2
I am man -- hear me roar!
In our politically correct society, one segment of the populace can still acceptably be victimized by prejudice. Men. It's always open season on men.
America's sensitivity training has taught us to be respectful of every demographic group except for men. Tease us. Cajole us. Mock us. Heck, we don't ask for directions! That's funny stuff! We'll do a beige load of laundry because we're too dumb to know if beige goes with the whites or colors.
Commercials portray us as people who love our satellite dishes, flat-screen TVs and cars, above all else. We're told on a regular basis that we're emotionally vapid. That women are more sensitive, more nurturing, more communicative, smarter in every way. It seems to me "Everybody Loves Raymond," except for his wife, who constantly calls him an idiot.
The next time you hear someone say the words "Men are ..." -- replace the word "men" with any other group. "Jewish people are ...," "Gay people are ...," "Italians are ..." Whatever words come next are general, inaccurate, unfair, prejudicial and often times despicable.
But that's OK because ... men are pigs. Men only think with their lower anatomy. Men are more violent than women. Men scratch themselves in inappropriate places and belch at inopportune times. Men are less important in raising children; so women should be granted custody in 90 percent of divorces.
These are indisputable facts, aren't they? So, label us. We're all the same. Right? In case the sarcasm doesn't drip off the page, let me answer my own question: Of course not!
But the predominant view of men appears to be unfairly negative. Can you think of even one generally positive pervading thought about men? Men are ... what? Good at fixing things around the house? Men are ... stable? This is all we get?
Well, as an unstable man who's lousy at fixing things around the house, all the negative depictions of men are eating away at my self-esteem. I constantly have to remind myself that I'm not a pig. I don't scratch ... that much ... at least, not when people are looking. I express my feelings ... when I have them. I am extremely nurturing. And now I choose to defend myself by going on the attack! That shouldn't come as a surprise. As a man, it's in my nature to be aggressive.
Let's face it. Women are frequently the worst-case scenario, as in: "I'll call a couple of the guys and see if they want to play golf Tuesday. Worst-case scenario, I'll play with my wife."
That's because when it comes to male-female relationships, men are usually the better athletes. Yep, you read that right. Men are better athletes. They're bigger, faster and stronger! Oooh, I'm a crazy man living on the edge! Watch out, I'm about to run with scissors. I'm crazy!! How dare I make such generalizations!
First, my credentials. I have five sisters, four of whom are very good athletes (the fifth I have to assume was adopted). I'm sure my sister Jane can still crush me in basketball, and I stopped trying to beat my sister Tricia in arm wrestling when I was a junior in high school. In fifth grade, I lost a boy-girl baseball hitting competition to Sue Minogue. She popped up to the pitcher. I hit a hard ground ball, but the contest was "distance traveled in the air." I still have night sweats about the humiliation that followed. I also dated a swimmer in college who was so muscular I thought I'd eventually get some sort of "Crying Game" surprise.
And I'm sure that my sisters can match up with their mates in several athletic endeavors -- tennis, skiing, darts, jogging. But indulge me. In most relationships, the man is better than his female counterpart. I'm not saying every man is better than every woman. I'm simply saying that more often than not -- in somewhere between 50.00001 and 99 percent of the cases, men in a relationship are better overall athletes than their female counterparts. Cripes, Mia Hamm is hanging out with Nomar Garciaparra -- and he might even be the better soccer player. John McEnroe says he can beat Venus Williams in tennis right now, and I have no reason to doubt him.
Therefore, it's often difficult for men to play sports with their significant others. I went skiing with my young lady friend recently and was pleasantly surprised to discover that she's every bit as mediocre as I am. Man and woman: equal. Now, how often does that happen?
The ski trip was extremely enjoyable and relaxing. The ping-pong game I played with my ex-wife on our honeymoon was not. I played left-handed and tapped everything back, but since I tapped everything back, I eventually won every point. Apparently, that made me an overly competitive bully. I probably should have intentionally whiffed a few shots, but that doesn't work either. My friend Matt tells me his wife also got peeved at him once for crushing her in racquetball, so he started giving away points. And she got even angrier ... because he was patronizing her. Playing sports with women can be a no-win situation.
In the world of ulcers, a woman playing golf with her boyfriend is what's known as a "carrier." Mrs. Feinswog was the original cause of my dyspepsia. I was her regular caddy. I don't think she ever hit a ball more than 80 yards, and before every shot she'd ask me what club she should use.
"Well, you've still got about 200 yards, so you should probably stay with that same freakin' 4-wood for about three or four more shots. Then after a couple of chips and three putts, I think you should ignore your husband, when he says 'The rest of that's good,' and then putt it out anyway!"
Therein lies the rub. Women always putt it out! Either that or they overcompensate by saying, "The rest of that's good" when you're still in the sand trap.
I'd rather be stranded on a desert island with Fred Willard than be accused of slow play. So when a woman waggles over the ball like she's Sergio Garcia, and then rolls the ball up the fairway about 40 yards and stops to ask what she did wrong, I look back at the tee and see a foursome catching up to a twosome, and I die a thousand deaths. I was playing with my ex-wife once when a group behind us asked if they could play through, and I asked if I could go with them. Please!
Believe me, I know that even as I'm writing this, I'm thinking I'm going to make somebody angry. But as I write that, I'm thinking, "Why?" I've acknowledged many women are exceptional athletes. I've acknowledged many women, including family members and my love interest, can more than hold their own with me. But I'm also making the claim that, "generally speaking," men often can qualify for sainthood if they play sports with women without having a vein burst through their temple.
How do I know this? I guess I don't. Can I prove it? Nope -- can't prove it. I'm just stating an opinion based on general observations and stereotypes.
In other words, I'm such a pig!
Bob Halloran is an anchorman for ESPNEWS. |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
devilmunchkin
|
|
first circle of the inferno
Jul 2001
time: 05:17
|
|
HI
i'm a woman
I've never been abused. i REALLY enjoy sex and often i like painful masochistic sex (to a certain extent. no saddles and cattleprods).
I've never felt abused by any man that i've had intercourse. i saw it as a equal exchange and connection between us.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Sirotnikov
|
 |
<--- Yes, It's a "kitty" in a boot.
Feb 2000
time: 07:17
|
|
Snappy, don't be so grimm.
You're using that feminist logic again 
Just becaue men get annoyed by women who hate men and want to abuse them, doesn't mean they don't accept good ideas.
I support women's rights and I support equality in everything possible.
However, I do acknowledge there are ungappable differences, starting with biological ones such as sex and pregnancy, and continuing to psychological and social ones.
I think the correct idea would be to make more equality and freedom, and to ease up the burden of each sex in roles which can't be devided.
But still, women and men are not the same, and while equal, are different. One simply can't treat them exactly the same in every scenario.
Further more, my personal views are much more family directed. Many people today see their will for achievement as higher than anything else.
I personally think, that when you bear a child, you should put him in the top of the priorities list. Admittedly it puts much greater pressure on the mother, and fathers must do more than they do today.
It is very unsatisfying for a woman to give up career for a kid, and see her husband get to high places. But I think that first, the husband should do his best to allow his wife to have her own career. Esp. I think a man should not leave his home and persue "bread making" because the child needs a father.
I believe that TV / nannies are not good replacements for caring and loving parents 24/7.
And when the child is grown up enough, the husband should overtake many responsabilities to allow the mother to return to her normal career life.
And in any case, even if one side does appear to "lose", this shouldn't be looked at from a selfish personal perspective, but rather from a "family" point of view. Naturally, this shouldn't be used to justify keeping down women, but this should be remembered.
quote:
Originally posted by blackice
 Tingkai Good comeback... completely irrellivant, personal, no issues raised no points made.
|
Unfortunately true.
|
|
| |
|
| |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:17.
Apolyton Time is 00:17. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|
26-02-2002 19:53
|