 |
|
Worthingtons
|
|
Pride Park,Derby
Jan 2002 time: 05:17
|
|
Civ III, I've played Civ II quite a bit already. Civ III, despite it's slightly linear play style does have good replayability.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
sachmo71
|
|
de Tejas
May 2001 time: 23:17
|
|
Well, Civ II is still a bit better for longterm playability (I've played but 3 games of Civ 3 since on the easy levels the endgame gets boring) but I COULD NOT be stranded with just one game. I would have to swim home and get more.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
MOHonor
|
|
Nashville, TN
Jan 2001 time: 05:17
|
|
I can't wait until Civ 4 comes out and Dissident says how it completely sucks compared to Civ 3.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
MOHonor
|
|
Nashville, TN
Jan 2001 time: 05:17
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Dissident
yeah I can't wait either.
of course I never seriously said civ3 sucks (I may have unseriously said it). And I don't believe I did so here. I merely said civ2 had better replay value.
but feel free to put whatever words you want into my mouth. |
Man. You go down easy.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
ColdWizard
|
|
civ2, i enjoy playing MP and scenarios
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Caligastia
|
|
I havent played Civ III yet, so I will have to go with Civ2
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:17. Apolyton Time is 00:17. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|