 |
|
BucksRock
|
|
Have Sid design it.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
|
You've got to kidding, right?
They didn't get Civ 3 done, how in heck are they supposed to be think about/working on Civ 4? The game is a disapointment to me, FIX Civ 3 before anyone talks to me about paying MORE money for another one of Firaxis's games!
|
|
|  |
 |
|
kailhun
|
 |
Leiden, The Netherlands
Nov 2001 time: 05:18
|
|
quote: Originally posted by bigfree1
You've got to kidding, right?
They didn't get Civ 3 done, how in heck are they supposed to be think about/working on Civ 4? The game is a disapointment to me, FIX Civ 3 before anyone talks to me about paying MORE money for another one of Firaxis's games! |
But ...
- If you assume that Firaxis is not in the business of making good computer games, but is primarily focused on making money.[1]
- Then they would go for the option which makes them the most cash.
- You and perhaps 500 others who were disappointed in civ III won't but civ IV.
- But thousands will.
- A patch won't net you anything dosh (just more complaints).
- An expansion pack will net you green, but usually at about half the price a new game will.
So, Civ IV is the best option for Firaxis. Take Civ III, take the fan-feedback, put in the effort needed for an expansion pack, call the result Civ IV and sell it for full price.
If people will vote for Pimmetje, they'll buy Civ IV.[2]
Robert
[1] In which case they would be better of in the drug trade, I suspect.
[2] You won't get this unless you're Dutch. Don't worry about it, it just means there are many stupid people out there.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:18. Apolyton Time is 00:18. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|