 |
|  |
 |
|
Brent
|
|
I think there should be a difficulty slider. 10 levels of difficulty. People keep saying they want it more challenging. Of course there should be more challenging levels available, but what about those people new to the game, or have not played it as extensively as you? I have been playing Civ games for about three years, but not as frequently as some do. I recently reminded myself that I can not get anywhere in Civ2 or SMAC at anything beyond the easiest level! I am simply gaming- impaired. I enjoy games greatly, but am no good at any. Tough luck, do you say? well I'll buy Civ3 no matter what, but I guess there's nothing I can do if I'll never be able to win at a higher level than the easiest. Hey, I win very easily at the easiest level of both games, but nothing at the next one. All I ask is that there be a second level that's challenging but doable, or at least more interesting. I'll even be fine if the easiest level is challenging but doable, but I prefer there to be one I know I'll win. Of course, I could try practicing more and rereading the manuals and strategy guides...
|
|
|  |
 |
|
tniem
|
|
Hope College
Apr 2000 time: 00:12
|
|
Conquest shouldn't be that hard to win after the easy levels. Now, the boys over at Civ II strategies have many more ideas than I do, but what you need to do is expand your empire (more cities) so you have new units every few turns. Then take a bunch of units in one swoop and defeat your enemies.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Brent
|
|
no, I don't even know what Newsmax is.
I wanted more levels for people who are too good at one level but no good at the next higher one. By the veterans do you mean everyone who's played before or those who beat the game every time at Deity level? If the latter, I suspect that most people to pick up the game are not veterans, so why focus on what they think? Appeal to the masses, whether that means my idea or not. My idea is not just for the sake of change, this particular change would help me out. Maybe with more levels, I can get better more easily through practice at my own level.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Diablo, Bro. of Mephisto
|
|
Salt Lake City, USA
Oct 2000 time: 05:12
|
|
Brent,
I am mostly like you, no matter how hard I try, I cant seem to beat the game beyond the first 2 difficulty levels, and yet, I womp everyone elses rears when playing on the easiest level. Heres a suggestion for beating civ2:
Go after the most important wonders and techs. I NEVER, EVER let the AI get leonardos workshop, or united nations, great wall, or mannhatten project. as soon as I get to be able to build nukes, I build 5-10 of them, launching them at my enemies' 5-10 largest cities. then I send in howitzers and tanks to clean up the rest, after the troops, I send in engineers to clean up the polution. remember, the greatest weapon of war is deception and surprise.
something else too: I always go after fundementalism as a choice government. it gives you un-beatable amounts of money, you dont have to worry about the senate ruling against you, your people are never ever un-happy. although the drawback is that under fundementalism, you dont get techs as fast as you do with other forms of government.
just a suggestion, hope you enjoy it. 
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:12. Apolyton Time is 00:12. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|