 |
|  |
 |
|
PGM
|
 |
Lisboa, Portugal
Aug 2001 time: 05:18
|
|
So what should Firaxis focus on now?
Here are my thoughts, in preference order.
Patching Civ3
I believe that this is a great game, the best Civ so far, and you all know how good Civ2 was. But I think that people forgot of how annoying Civ2 could sometimes be (ridiculous ZOC, AI founding "secret" size-1 cities inside your empire, 100+ civil disorder pop-ups, weak military AI, ...) and they should remember that when criticizing Civ3 in a non-constructive way (ie, not making suggestions or giving ideas).
So, I think that patching Civ3 to perfection is the path to follow, for it leads to an attainable goal.
The early game is excellent; if all the game could be as exciting, we'd end up with a legendary game on our hands.
MultiPlayer
I know most of you are eager for MP. No doubt that a human opponent is far more challenging that AI. IMHO, I just don't think the time is right for it yet; The game can and should be improved before allowing for such a demanding expansion. Soon enough, Firaxis would have to deal with different bugs and patches for both SP and MP. Let them concentrate resources on a problem at a time, because that will bring more efficient results.
I say: consolidate now - expand later (which doesn't mean I'm not eager for MP either).
Civilization 4
A few radical people are so annoyed with the basics in Civ3 that they've given up on it. And let's face it: many more patches will come, but the fundamentals will remain more or less the same. If you feel that Civ3 is hopeless and beyond any further tweaking, but still love the whole Civilization concept and want Firaxis to abandon Civ3 soon and focus on Civ4, this is the option for you.
other games
Vote for this one if you're absolutely fed up and have given up on the whole Civilization concept, want to see other games developed and only come to these forums to bash, rant and complaint in a non-constructive way (I think this option might gather a few votes... ).
...
Open option, elaborate below please.
Any thoughts?
.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
|
How about finding a new line of work for those who conceptualized Civ 3; a truly uninspiring piece of work it is!
|
|
|  |
 |
|
rockhpi
|
|
Michigan
Mar 2002 time: 05:18
|
|
My highest priority would be to set up Civ3 to add new civs in the same way SMAC added new factions...just add the civ to the pool of possible civs. Frustrating having to remove a civ to install a new one (keeping in mind the advisor-screen crash).
RockHPI
|
|
|  |
 |
|
ColdWizard
|
|
1. patches
2. scenario editor
3. MP
|
|
|  |
 |
|
The Rook
|
 |
Florida
Oct 2001 time: 00:18
|
|
I just hope there will be a Civ 4. Civilization is a timeless concept. It was fun 10 years ago, it is fun now, and will be fun in the future. I'd like to see the game progress with new concepts, and smartter, better AI, Bigger maps, more units, improvemnets, advancements, wonders, etc.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Richelieu
|
|
Gatineau
Dec 2001 time: 00:18
|
|
Patching and Multiplayer.
In that order.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Syrio
|
|
Wolverhampton, UK
Nov 2001 time: 05:18
|
|
Patch no doubt! And fast too!
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:18. Apolyton Time is 00:18. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|