 |
|
benjdm
|
|
Upstate NY
Dec 2001
time: 05:18
|
|
Wow. Interesting concept. Might make explorers useful, too. Anyone played a game through yet ?
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Pyrodrew
|
|
Interesting concept... wait others already said that. Another thing you would have to balance out is the huge advantage that gives to Militaristic Civs, who generally get more leaders & the more aggressive Civs would get more elite units.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Elucidus
|
|
Well, militaristic and expansionists would have a nice advantage.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Elucidus
|
|
Yeah, I am curious about the next patch myself. I don't want to get too far ahead of myself.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Soapyfrog
|
|
Montreal, QC, Canada
Nov 2001
time: 00:18
|
|
Don't you think that makes the game:
a) heavily based on random chance (# of goody huts I find and number of those that are settlers, as well as the number of leaders I manage to generate)
b) primarily a military slugfest (every opportunity to fight I'll take, especially since every captured enemy city and every leader I generate is worth it's wieght in gold).
In such a game I would play only the Aztecs or the Zulus, and it would be over very quickly...
|
|
| |
|
|
|
SirJethro
|
|
how much of a slugfest would it really be, given that each civ only has one city to build units (except the ones they conquer or ones built from leaders)?
|
|
| |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:18.
Apolyton Time is 00:18. |
top of page
|
|
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|
14-03-2002 20:47
Attachment: 
|