 |
|  |
 |
|
ajli@home
|
|
Los Angeles, California, United States
Aug 2000 time: 05:12
|
|
Let's say that if you establish a colony over 20 tiles away from the capital or something, if the colony goes in unrest for over 3 turns it can actualyl "declare" independance. When it does it instantly builds 2 high tech units and seizes all units inside (captures) and the city. It then influences all cities nearby to instantly have 4 unhappy citizens. If they revolt they instantly join the revolting civ that is not the "barbarians" rather a different country altogether.
Also, instead of "barbarins", we should have different small countries that wage wars on you. These new countries that have no home yet can actually build cities and start wars and stuff. These people can have like a +25% attack and defense bonus for simply historical purposes, so many games may have up to 15 civs at once in a game. This attack and defense bonus also goes to the revolutions.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Anodyne
|
 |
Being perverse is bad.
Jan 2001 time: 07:12
|
|
Hmm. Yes, I like the idea. Or, the nation that wants independence could also just kindly ask you for independence, and you could grant it or not. If you don't grant it, there's a change of civil war in the city, and perhaps a change of some other civs disliking you for that (when the UN is around, perhaps)
And this would be an efficient way of getting minor civs into the game, too. For example, when you find settlers or an advanced tribe from a goody hut, it would become your province, that could later demand independence. Or authonomy. Or stay in your control, if you're a fair ruler.
------------------
Eating people is fun.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
ajli@home
|
|
Los Angeles, California, United States
Aug 2000 time: 05:12
|
|
Asking for Independance? LOL. Hehe.
Also, we should be able to give individual taxes to city (though we can still set up the majority rates). They could either demand lower taxes or city improvements or whatever. If you fail to fulfill/ignore them, they revolt.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Zeevico
|
|
Melbourne, Australia
Dec 2000 time: 05:12
|
|
Thats a pretty good idea, but why not have influenced revolts, for example 15 american cities are one citizen away from unrest(enough to make another civ) and spain decides to help the newly born nation (if they decide to revolt despite their not being rioting) by gifts of knowledge and military to spite the americans (like the American Revolution, how French helped just to spite the Brits).
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Mo
|
|
I think there show then also be an option to say that in 10 turns or some time frame you will grant them their independence because right now is not conveniant for some reason. Also I think that if you grant independence to the country it showed have good relations with you atleast at the begining.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Diablo, Bro. of Mephisto
|
|
Salt Lake City, USA
Oct 2000 time: 05:12
|
|
Does anyone ever look up the old threads?
anyway, I wont let it bother me AGAIN. I like this idea. But now that we know that civ3 WILL have nation borders, it wont matter our far cities are away from your capital, they are technically, and offically part of your nation.
also, a certain city should be in anarchy for more then just three turns. Make it at least 5.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Diablo, Bro. of Mephisto
|
|
Salt Lake City, USA
Oct 2000 time: 05:12
|
|
oops, double post.
[This message has been edited by Diablo, Bro. of Mephisto (edited January 24, 2001).]
|
|
|  |
 |
|
The Viceroy
|
 |
tu mumbai se, mai Bombay se
Nov 2000 time: 05:12
|
|
Like the basis of this idea very much .. not just in the American context, but in the context of nations swallowed up by others reclaiming their independance at a later date (especially via Imperialism)..
think the idea of government intervention to aid a rebellion in your enemies cities is historically acurate .. not just the influence of the French, but also the creation of Panama by the Americans, who just wanted to build the Panama canal.
CTP already has distance from capital as a factor, but I think land mass should also come into effect, seperate land masses should quickly gain a feeling of independance, regardless of how good the home nation is to them.
Independance has been gained many times, by a simple request and without war .. Britain granted Canada & Australia nationhood . without any need for a war.. India struggled for Independance, but it was social disobediance and education which eventually made Britain grant them independance. Russia also granted many former soviet states independance.
There are certainly occations, where granting independance could be an advantage to the home civ .. certainly, a rioting city takes resources to calm down .. which in times of crisis may not be afforded. The likelyhood of a long drawn out war of independance may also be chilling .. as it could leave you vunrable elsewhere ..
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:12. Apolyton Time is 00:12. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|