 |
|  |
 |
|
MrWhereItsAt
|
 |
New Year's Resolution: 2005 is the year of Where It's At - come get some.
Nov 2001 time: 17:18
|
|
I know we are heading towards our third term, meaning elections. But I read somewhere that we can't have ppl reprising their roles more than twice in a row. If this is so, we are gonna have major problems finding enough ppl willing to end up in the responsible positions, and even less who are able to DO the job.
I have put a post in the High Council thread for someone "in authority" to answer the question of whether this is anticonstitutional or not, so everyone else use this thread for discussion. Should it be OK to hold a High Council position multiple terms? Or should it be OK to stay in power multiple terms as long as you rotate position from Prez to Vice to Defence etc? Be realists here - at the rate the game is going, we are going to need many more contributors to continue cycling through Councillors without many repeats.
Personally, I think that perhaps we should give preference to any newcomer who can seriously do the job, but if such a person doesn't materialize we should be able to have, say, El Awrence continue in his position of Trade Advisor. Especially if they have done a good job, or they haven't actually needed to do anything! (Have you had much to do there, El Awrence?)
This member has spoken, I open the floor to the Honourable Members.
Liberty Hall, guys. Speak up! 
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:18. Apolyton Time is 00:18. |
top of page
|
|
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|