Apolyton Archive  |  Preserved copy of the Apolyton Civilization Site and its forums as they stood in September 2005. Read-only; nothing here can be posted to or replied to.  |  Forum index |  About this archive |  The 1998–2001 UBB forums
Today on Apolyton WARDELL INTERVIEW PROMO A.C.S. HISTORY CHAPTER 4 GET CIV4 /w FREE PLUS! A.C.S. PHOTO GALLERY GET A.O.M. V1.1
Apolyton Civilization Forums
main| civ2| civ3| civ4| smac| ctp2| ron| moo3| galciv| galciv2| alt| about|
ApolytonPLUS | register | search | faq | new posts | pm (-/-) | upload | members
hall of fame new! | civgroups | civgroups news | interviews | the column | radio | chat | directory | news | store | PLUS
Apolyton Civilization Forums : Powered by vBulletin version 2.0.3 Apolyton Civilization Forums > Miscellaneous > Archive > Civ3-General-Archive > Unbalanced - General Population vs Millitary
Show a Printable Version | Email This Page to Someone! | Receive updates to this thread | Report this to Apolyton news!

bottom of page
  
Author
Thread    < Last Thread     Next Thread > Post New Thread     Post A Reply
jglidewell is offline jglidewell
Warlord
manassas va usa
Feb 2001
time: 00:12
Post  Old Post 03-02-2001 10:28
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#1 Report this post to a moderator
Unbalanced - General Population vs Millitary Support Apolyton, buy Civilization 2

One of the most unbalanced.unrealistic things about civ is the ratio of population to military population.

At most points in the game a city supports far more millitary units than there ever were in reality. And the military unit covers far more territory than they ever would in reality. This makes the cities and map puny in comparison to military units and makes micro management of the military ugly.

It turns the game into military conquest, all the time.

Stacking isn't the answer only the problem. Tone down the production of military units.

jglidewell is offline jglidewell
Warlord
manassas va usa
Feb 2001
time: 00:12
Post  Old Post 03-02-2001 10:44
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#2 Report this post to a moderator
Support Apolyton or Terrorists Win

One other thing I forgot. Millitary units should be produced in two steps. Personnel and weapons.

Personnel and the weapons should than be matched to produce a full unit.

MrFun is offline MrFun
King
of Iowa
Nov 2000
time: 23:12
Post  Old Post 03-02-2001 00:51 Visit MrFun's homepage!
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#3 Report this post to a moderator
Support Apolyton buy from Amazon

I totally disagree - I want to be able to maintain the same mass armies that have existed since ancient times. In fact, Civilization II made it a little hard to maintain a realistic mass military force.

As for your second post - no way. It would make the game more complicated and less fun.

Mihai is offline Mihai
Warlord
Bucharest, Romania
Jan 2000
time: 07:12
Thumbs up  Old Post 03-02-2001 02:07
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#4 Report this post to a moderator
Browse Apolyton AD-FREE

Number of military units should be limited by your population (unless mercenary).
Maybe if you can set a max% of pop that can be drafted - and proportional with unhappiness?

DarkCloud is offline DarkCloud
Civ3 Stories Editor
of Lists
Jul 2000
time: 05:12
Arrow  Old Post 05-02-2001 00:06 Visit DarkCloud<br><img src=/forums/images/staff-icon.gif>'s homepage!
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#5 Report this post to a moderator
Support Apolyton, buy Alpha Centauri

Huh? movement is not reflecting reality- A turn in the ancient ages is 20 years, in the middle ages it is 2-5 years, in the 1900-2000's it is 1 year.

If anything the movement is too less, a tile represents about 100-300 miles. A Roman Legion could travel 30 miles in a day.

The armies are most likely only made up of 1,000 people in ancient ages, and I do agree with you that the population should take a small hit as the unit is mustered.

But this brings up an interesting point, you should determine how many people in your city go into the legion or unit.

Trachmir
Guest

Not Yet
time:
Post  Old Post 07-02-2001 14:46
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#6 Report this post to a moderator
Inflate your Upload Space

Another thing... WE NEED SEPERATE QUEUES FOR MILITARY AND IMPROVEMENTS!

with a little slider to determine how much production to be distributed to both.

As for actually drafting population... I'm all for that, and if you draft a large % of the population, the cities' happiness should drop (like Lords of the Realm).

Units should have more movement, but attacking should use a % of remaining movement (as well as boarding/landing/etc.) not a flat charge of 1. Units should be cheaper as well, it doesn't take 20 years to make a warrior unit... especially not 5 turns of 20 years! Instead, units should be instantly created (if they can be created in 1 turn), their production cost subtracted from the available pool... this process can continue on-and-on until there is no longer enough production... that "remaing" production is used to create the unit the following turn. In WWII, in the matter of 1 year, America greatly increased the size of it's military AND deployed them... Civ3 should strive for this level of realism, yes it makes conflict more of a threat and less predictable... but afterall, that is the nature of war.

Grumbold is offline Grumbold
Emperor
London, UK
Mar 2000
time: 05:12
Post  Old Post 08-02-2001 10:00
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#7 Report this post to a moderator
Support Apolyton, pre-order Civilization IV

I'd agree with all your points except for one thing - Civ is a game trying to be fun within the broad sweep of history. It is not (and never could be) an accurate economic, political and military simulator for the entire sweep of human history. I suggest you look up reviews of of Europa Universalis to get some idea of how difficult it is to produce a military and economic model for a period of even three hundred years when technology was evolving slowly. Any atempt to increase accuracy would have to start by reducing the timescale of a turn drastically. In ancient days a large empire might need months to muster and react to an invasion, but modern communications reduces that drastically. Combat, including the production and movement of military units, needs to stay very abstract if the game is to have its sweeping transition of time.

  < Last Thread     Next Thread > Post New Thread     Post A Reply
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:12.
Apolyton Time is 00:12.
    top of page
Rate This Thread:
archivepost
Forum Jump:
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
 




Contact Us - Apolyton Civilization Site - Support Us!

Building a better Apolyton through better information. Click here and take our poll!
Non-US visitors, click here!

Powered by: vBulletin Version 2.0.3
Copyright ©2000, 2001, Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.

Page generated in 0.0349 seconds (85.68% PHP - 14.32% MySQL) with 30 queries
Page Loading Time:

Support Apolyton: Amazon USA | Amazon UK | Amazon DE | Amazon FR |
Support Apolyton and get FREE PLUS, Buy from Chips&Bits: Galactic Civilizations | Galactic Civilizations: Deluxe Edition | Call to Power 2 | Civilization: The Boardgame | GURPS/ Alpha Centauri | Alpha Centauri | Civilization IV | Civilization III: Complete |


Front Page | Civilization IV | Civilization III | Civilization II | Call to Power II | Alpha Centauri | Master of Orion III
Rise of Nations | Galactic Civilizations | Galactic Civilizations II | Misc
Alt.Civs | Civ I | C:CtP I | About | News | Directory | Apolyton Store | Forums | Chat | Columns | Interviews | Newsletter
Scenario League | CSC | Clash of Civs | Spanish Site | CtP Maps | Cradle of Civ | WesW's Ctp1/2 Site | Civ3 Haven

apolyton.net | apolyton.com | civilization2.net | civilization3.net | civilization4.net | civilizationiv.info | calltopower.net | galciv.net | galciv2.net | moo3.net