 |
|  |
 |
|
Wraith
|
 |
Austin, Texas, USA
Aug 1999 time: 23:18
|
|
We're certainly still evolving, but we're influencing the course of the changes. So far our main influence is a secondary effect; by altering our surroundings we are influencing our changes. This is a slow process, however, so we really haven't done much yet. The real changes will either not show up for a long time to come, or will be made artificially, through gene therepay or whatnot.
--"open to intrepretation, but I say de-evolution"
That's an amusing commentary, but not really the case. There's a phenomenon called regression to the mean which pretty much invalidates it.
--"But all animals learn from their forefathers in a different way thans humans do -- it's called instinct,"
Instincts aren't learned. I think you mean behaviours.
--"The Marching Morons - By Henry Kuttner"
I think I remember that story. If it is the one I'm thinking of, it was pretty good. I've actually been trying to remember that title.
Wraith
"Never interrupt your enemy when he is making a mistake."
-- Napoleon Bonaparte
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Ethelred
|
|
This is what I get for relying on a decade or more old memory.
Its not Henry Kuttner.
Its C.M. Kornbluth. Written in 1951.
About all I got right was the title and the fact that morons ARE involved in the story.
I think I must have mixed a bunch of stuff together. Typical. I try to avoid it but sometimes I don't.
Heck according to this it was a funny story.
http://www.goldkeys.com/ScienceFict...0380000547.html
The review is about a third of the way down. Not too long. Not at all what I was thinking.
Mea culpa.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
ranskaldan
|
 |
Beijing ~ Singapore ~ Toronto ~ All hail to the new Rome
Sep 2001 time: 00:18
|
|
Evolution goes by two steps:
1) Random mutations. Most are harmful, few are good.
2) Natural selection. Environmental pressures remove harmful mutations, leave behind the good mutations. Thus the population slowly becomes more and more adapted.
(HIV example: as people more susceptible to AIDS get AIDS more and are more likely to die, slowly the gene makeup of the human race shifts towards more resistance towards AIDS.)
However, with modern advancements, natural selection among humans is vastly diminished when compared to other, wilder species.
I mean, how many of us have experienced floods, famines, several epidemics, deadly childhood diseases (without treatment), wars, etc? Yet this is what most other species, as well as most humans before 1900, experience all the time.
In fact, with Step 2 removed, the harmful mutations in Step 1 are no longer "negated". Thus it is possible that humans are devolving.
The same thing can be said about domestic pets.
(Not that I'm advocating things like the removal of healthcare or peace. That would totally screw up all of our lives! No, we must wait for artificial evolution to begin, i.e. gene therapy and so on.)
|
|
|  |
 |
|
chegitz guevara
|
 |
Ft. Lauderdale, FL Communist Party of Apolyton
Jun 2000 time: 00:18
|
|
quote: Originally posted by MrFun
Can you clarify what you mean exactly by your HIV example? |
Okay, some people seem to have an inborn resistence to HIV. They can carry the virus, but it doesn't kill them. Instead of being killed by the virus, they are more likely to be able to propagate their resistent genes (assuming they can find a member of the opposite sex who is also imune). As the virus spreads through the population, those with the immunity will eventually supplant those without it.
Admittedly, it's not a great example, because the mere fact of having the virus doesn't ensure finding a suitable mate, or that the children will be immune to the virus. In fact, it would be irresponsible. But theoretically, given enough time and no articifial controlls like vaccines, medices, genocide of HIV carriers, eventuall the only humans left would be HIV resistent.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
ranskaldan
|
 |
Beijing ~ Singapore ~ Toronto ~ All hail to the new Rome
Sep 2001 time: 00:18
|
|
quote: Originally posted by chegitz guevara
Our species is only 100 to 200 thousand years old, so we have a relatively long run ahead of us. |
It doesn't matter what the average "lifespan" of an organism is. If humans manage to nuke ourselves extinct, then no average lifespan can help us.
The "average" is just a statistic, a compounding of the billions of species before us. Man as a species is anything but average in the Animal Kingdom, having totalled unrivaled capabilities like massive farming, power plants, and nukes, which make the 3-million year average useless as a "rule of thumb" in this specific case.
Last edited by ranskaldan on 24-03-2002 at 06:33
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:18. Apolyton Time is 00:18. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|