 |
|
Mongoose
|
|
Harrisburg,PA USA
Apr 1999 time: 00:18
|
|
Build the Telepathic Matrix ASAP, hehe.
Why would you build enough bases to cover the Huge map of Planet? Wouldn't you say you've won already? Call the council, vote yourself SL and be done with it!
PS. You shoulda thought of the drone trouble BEFORE you built the CV.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Grail Quest
|
 |
BC, Canada
Mar 2002 time: 05:18
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Mongoose
Build the Telepathic Matrix ASAP, hehe.
Why would you build enough bases to cover the Huge map of Planet? Wouldn't you say you've won already? Call the council, vote yourself SL and be done with it!
PS. You shoulda thought of the drone trouble BEFORE you built the CV. |
I did think of drone trouble before building the Cloning Vats, but I had so many facilities that reduced drones that I really didn't think it would hurt. I think it wasn't so much the population at each base, but the overall Bureaucracy that started the Drone trouble. ARGH! Why am I being penalized for being successful?! 
I had maybe a quarter of the bases to a third. By starting to conquer the Hive and building more, I was moving up to 1/3rd to 1/2. My bases don't have a lot of military, except where I was fighting the Hive, so my votes were relatively low. I had 2 Pacts and 3 Treaties, but they were with smallish factions. My own voting power was pretty big, but not quite there yet.
In the end, I took a chance and sided with one of the bigger factions to secure another Pact while breaking a Treaty, hoping that it wouldn't immediately break another Pact (I don't think it's fair that the other factions can buzz me up on the Comlink anytime during my turn, when I can't do the same when they are taking their turns... but I digress). I did at that point vote myself Supreme Leader. Would have liked to do it with six Pacts going, but having set up so many vendettas, it was now tricky to do so. 
|
|
|  |
 |
|
optimus2861
|
|
Halifax, NS
Nov 2000 time: 01:18
|
|
Turn the new population into specialists, preferably engineers or transcendi, if you've made it that far. It'll keep 'em from rioting, net you some cash & labs, and put a brake on base growth, too. Empaths or thinkers are OK, too, they'll get you a bit of psych to help with any other rioters.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Earwicker
|
 |
Washington, DC, USA
Mar 1999 time: 00:18
|
|
Unless there is a compelling strategic reason for hanging onto the newly-captured bases, then do like Ogi sez and give them to one of your pact-mates. Distant captured bases generally offer you almost no energy (even with Dierdre or Aki's efficiency bonuses, the losses can be severe). Given to a submissive, they're good for commerce energy to one of your bases (usually a high-energy core base where the efficiency losses aren't as great). Keeps those little pactmates happy and strong, too.
If you want to hang onto the base (even if only for a few turns until it's safe to give an empty base to your Mates), convert a lot of the populace into specialists - all those labs and econ from Engineers aren't lost to inefficiency. If you have CBA and enough skyfarms, hunger isn't even that big an issue.
If you are in the middle of a war, then it could be worth your while to switch to Thought Control SE, now that the CV takes away its penalty - that can also help quell those rioters.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
johndmuller
|
 |
Capitol Hill, Colony of DC
Feb 2001 time: 00:18
|
|
To put it simply, you need at least enough food production to support the people who would otherwise be drones if they weren't psych specialists. If you have exactly that amount of food (or one more), the CV will not bump the population. If you can't drum up that much food production, then you can let them starve until there are few enough and/or you can increase the food supply. If you have more than enough food with only psych specialists, you can utilize some workers as lab and/or econ specialists instead to reach a balance you like between growth and output.
Personally, aside from the MM reduction, I've never feel like it's worth it to give bases to the AI. In MP games, it's sometimes desirable to give bases to another human player, but there are other costs and side effects due to the need to go briefly into vendetta in order to take over the base. I suppose you could do it with mind control, but that would be wasting a lot of ec's, probably more than you would lose in trade with a short vendetta. The other side effects, notably allies going into sympathetic vendetta are also difficult to control, especially with AI allies. It can also be tricky sometimes to give a base to another human since the vendetta forces a return-to-home of each others forces, requiring the acquirer to re-enter the givers territory before they can occupy the base, possibly taking up valuable trade turns while travelling to the base.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Shai-Hulud
|
|
Finland
Jan 2002 time: 07:18
|
|
I think it might be a good idea to give some bases to AI allies if you really don't need them. I just don't like to do that. You can always use specialist to make them productive and stable even if you loose all your energy to inefficiency. Many prefer a very centralized strategy without the burden of bureaucracy drones. I personally prefer to grow big if possible even though it increases the micromanagement.
I really don't like the way diplomacy was done in MP. Why, oh, why can't you give bases and units to other human players? It makes an MP little less entertaining to have these restrictions. Going vendetta in order to give bases to other human players doesn't work so well in late game when you might have a joint defense. It actually isn't even an option.
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:18. Apolyton Time is 00:18. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|