 |
|
Bereta_Eder
|
|
quote: Originally posted by DanS
The US doesn't put people to death or torture, etc. for political positions that they hold, but rather for acts that do or are conspiring to do. |
No. Also for political positions.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Bereta_Eder
|
|
quote: Originally posted by ZoboZeWarrior
Such thread title shows only a sad picture of a conceited and self-sufficient USA. |
I would like to be able to say it's just Dinodoc but...
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Evil_Eric_4
|
|
perhaps we should guillotine him.
That seems appropriate for a Frenchman.
Maybe France wont mind so much then(not that we care what the French want).
The hypocracy , oh the hypocracy.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
The Mad Monk
|
 |
of Ice Cream
Mar 2000 time: 23:18
|
|
I heard an interesting analysis on this from Ron Kuby yesterday. Apparently, one reson a prosecutor would want to say he is going for capital punishment is that the court would then select a Capital Case Jury. When a jury for a capital case is selected, prospective jurors may be removed if they have anti-death penalty views; this is because they may allow these views to color their judgement on the guilt or innocence of the defendant. One result of this is that persons with socially liberal POVs get knocked off of the jury, increasing the number of socially conservative (and more likely to convict on the same evidence) jurors.
Last edited by The Mad Monk on 31-03-2002 at 03:30
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:18. Apolyton Time is 00:18. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|