 |
|  |
 |
|
chegitz guevara
|
 |
Ft. Lauderdale, FL Communist Party of Apolyton
Jun 2000 time: 00:18
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Imran Siddiqui
the computer revolution took place because of capitalism.. there was money to be made (who would have decided it was needed back in the late 70s?) |
The computer revolution took place because of the cold war. It was government funding that drove the development of computers for a long time. Heck, IBM wasn't even interested in them at first. The first computers were built with government money (both in England and in the US). The researches didn't try and make computers to get rich (which they didn't), but because they loved building things (and partially to help the war effort).
I don't know if you're a creative person or not, Imran, but creative people, whether artists or musicians or authors or scientists or designers or engineers, have a need to experiment and create, to explore the world and to express themselves. Other's people's money make it possible for us to do this, but if it wern't there, we'd do it anyways. It's what we love to do. It's what we have to do. This is one reason why a communist society would be superior, because instead of having to grub for money, creative and inquisitive people would be able express themselves and explore the world, and society as a whole would benefit.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Jon Miller
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Kamrat X
JM et al, the development in society the recent 10 years or so show that the old communist parties have been side-tracked by reality. What is needed now is wide-ranging alliances, look at Italys Rifondazione Communista, Brazils PT, Denmarks red green Enhedlisten, Portugals Bloco de Esquerda and Great Britains Socialist Alliance. They have all managed to turn the tide so to speak, and this is by incorporating all or some of the subjects we discussed earlier.
And Horsie, we wouldn´t shoot you. We would make you the court jester/fool... |
please explain further (how have they become sidetracked by reality??P??
it seems to me that many 'communist' parties have basically shifted communism under the rug and took on different battles
when today, in the time of Globalisation, we need communism (the standard communism), more than ever
Jon Miller
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Jon Miller
|
|
hmmm
bump until I can post tonight
Jon Miller
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Dr Zoidberg

|
 |
Communist Party of Apolyton
Jan 2002 time: 06:18
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Jon Miller
please explain further (how have they become sidetracked by reality??P??
it seems to me that many 'communist' parties have basically shifted communism under the rug and took on different battles
when today, in the time of Globalisation, we need communism (the standard communism), more than ever
Jon Miller |
When the Berlin wall fell it created havoc in large segments of the commie movement, those who could adapt did so. Those who couldn´t now spend their measly existence whining about how it was better in the old days.
It also affected the commie movement in the way that suddenly all of Trotskys theories on the degenerated workers states became obsolete. This left various trotskyist groupings aimlessly wandering about without any real purpose or tools to deal with the situation.
The long winter lasted 5 years, until new years day 1994. When the zapatistas marched into San Christóbal de las Casas. This sparked a new wawe of public awareness and radicalization among youth.
The anti-MAI campaign united enviromentalists like Friends of the Earth (FoE) with the commie movement, in Sweden FoE Sweden and Socialist Party, Sweden (USFI) among others campaigned ferociously against MAI. As was the case in several other european countries. The campaign was a success the treaty was never signed. The EU-summit also started to get regular protests as a follower. In Amsterdam in 1997 50 000+ people demonstrated against neo-liberalism. The demonstrations included greens, trade unions, communists, anarchists, etc.
Seattle´99 made this a global movement, "teamsters and turtles" on a global scale so to speak. This is a wawe we´re riding yet today. Global radicalization of youth and workers on a variety of subjects. To say that this is diverting the attention away from the struggle for the proletarian revolution is, to put it mildly, ostrich behaviour.
For example, in Brazil the Brazilian Communist Party (PCB) and all its fellow stalinist/maoist/hoxaist comrades was completely sidetracked by the surge of left radicalism that created the World Social Forum in 1998. The main left opposition lies instead in Partido dos Trabalhadores (PT) especially in the state of Rio Grande do Sul and Porto Alegre where the left current in PT Democracia Socialista rules. PT supports and cooperates with organizations like ATTAC-Brazil, FoE Brazil, Movement of Landless Rural Laborers (MST) where as the PCB and others don´t really take part in this new movement thus leaving them "sidetracked by reality". This tendency (sic!) can also be seen in a variety of countries in Europe. In Sweden it´s only Socialist Party(USFI) that really participates in the new movement with their connections to FoE Sweden and ATTAC.
I mentioned ATTAC, and I really believe that they will make a difference. They have gathered people around them who have, until now, been somewhat unaware of the threat that neo-liberalism poses to humanity and the earth. In Sweden we had a massive radicalization of the ATTAC cadre during the EU-summit in Gothenburg. They saw with their own eyes the fascist face of the bourgeouis state (to use some RAF-terminology) and was rudely awakened from their petty-bourgeouis conception of democracy.
I don´t say that ATTAC will lead the proletarian revolution, but it´s a fertile ground for open-minded communists.
Does this answer your question, JM? 
Last edited by Dr Zoidberg on 08-04-2002 at 22:41
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Jon Miller
|
|
standard communism is not trotskyist, Leninist, or even marxist
so I do not see how some theories that they have made being invalidated invalidates communism
and I see the 'new communism' as getting sidetracked and losing it's focus
Jon Miller
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Jon Miller
|
|
oh
and I am an original thinker
many of my ideas are new to myself
Jon Miller
|
|
|  |
 |
|
chegitz guevara
|
 |
Ft. Lauderdale, FL Communist Party of Apolyton
Jun 2000 time: 00:18
|
|
Now, now, Komrat X, we don't law sole claim to communism. After all, there were communists before Marx. We just lay claim to communism based on scientifc theories, rather than morality.
We are not communists just because we think it would be nice to live in a better world. We are communists because we know communism is a superior system, and it has been proven to be so. Under similar condition, the degenerated workers states always out perform capitalist ones. Under ideal conditions, such ass the United States has, we would bury them.
We are communists because the internal logic of capitalism means that only one of two outcomes is possible, socialism or barbarism.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Dr Zoidberg

|
 |
Communist Party of Apolyton
Jan 2002 time: 06:18
|
|
quote: Originally posted by chegitz guevara
Now, now, Komrat X, we don't law sole claim to communism. After all, there were communists before Marx. We just lay claim to communism based on scientifc theories, rather than morality.
We are not communists just because we think it would be nice to live in a better world. We are communists because we know communism is a superior system, and it has been proven to be so. Under similar condition, the degenerated workers states always out perform capitalist ones. Under ideal conditions, such ass the United States has, we would bury them.
We are communists because the internal logic of capitalism means that only one of two outcomes is possible, socialism or barbarism. |
Point taken. But you have to admit that the pre-marxist communists don´t really have much to offer in terms of understanding of modern society.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Az
|
 |
MACEDONIA - It's the name of the sovereign country to the north of Greece
Apr 2000 time: 07:18
|
|
Let's say what we stand for.
for me it is:
-a Planned economical system in all aspects of economical life.
-an system that brings all people to similar working and living conditions.
-Equality between all people.
-Free education with acceptance to every faculty/department to fill up that workforce needed for future plans of development.
-Free Healthcare
-In the field of personal consumers , A number of products that would serve the same purpose , to let the consumer choose what they want to , and thus enjoy material freedom.
-Incentives in bonuses in payment for workers that work harder.
-Science promoted, Science honoured , Science tested. Because scholars are people too.
-Enviroment for the future of our children. If the enviroment goes against the interests of the Human race , ( and yes it could be , like those dams ) , I think the choice is clear.
-Everyone can have his own little private property. A book , Table, Chair , Car, and maybe even a small boat, when one gets older , and retires.
-Media owned by the government , run by itself. ( as the courts )
-Court system , a different branch of the government .
yes I think Jon is right here (again! ) Marx was correct on many points , but taking ideas from everywhere is the way.
neo-communism! 


|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:18. Apolyton Time is 00:18. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|