 |
|
ahenobarb
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Ribannah
(d) Editor tools
|
With greatly reduced hard coding of variables.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
monkspider
|
 |
banned
Aug 2001 time: 23:18
|
|
Good points Ribannah, I think it is likely they will use scenarios to introduce the new civs, but they will have to have either five or ten new civs (or fifteen, or twenty...) due to the fact that they must keep balance between the five cultural regions, here's something I posted in another thread on this subject
"....But this isn't about personal opinion, we have to try to put ourselves in the shoes of Firaxis. If they only include 5 civs I believe they will be
1. Spain (representing Europe)
2. Inca (represeniting America)
3. Carthage (representing Mediterranean)
4. Arabs (representing Middle-East)
5. Mongols (representing asia)
All five of these civs either appeared in Civ 2, or in the Civ 2 text files, so there is a historical precedent to believing that these will be Firaxis' decision.
However, if they only include five they will be leaving out important civs like the Vikings, and another African civ, etc. and it is important to have another African civ, due to only one appearing in Civ 3 (Zulus, Egypt doesn't count :-P) And it is important to note that the only choices here are either 5 or ten, any number inbetween will unbalance the regions.
It is possible that the Hebrews may be included, by I think the importance of having another African civ overrides the Hebrew's historical importance
6. Vikings (Europe)
7. Mayans? (america) This one is somewhat subjective admittedly
8. Turks (Mediterranean)
9. Ethiopians (middle east)
10. Korea (asia)
I went with Ethiopians (Aksumites) over some of the other African civs due to how colorfully their extragantly dressed leaders of old can be portrayed in the game.
The one civ that I'm not so sure about is the Mayans, since the masses may seem them as too similar to the Inca, it is possible that Firaxis will include the Sioux, but that would go against their statement that the Iroquois are to represent the entirety of the North-American tribes."
Any thouguhts?
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Akron
|
|
New civs may be nice, but personally I'd much rather see more resources go into making scenarios and a decent editor, along with added units and techs. Some tweaks of the existing tech tree would also be nice. The spaceship victory really has to be pushed back, as it screws up the modern age.
Also, the cultural groups dont have to balance. Right now there are 4 European civs and 3 of everything else. They just need to keep it close. They could possibly add another cultural group or break a current one apart if it will help in balancing out the sizes.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Ribannah
|
 |
The Netherlands, Embassy of the Iroquois Confederacy
Aug 2000 time: 06:18
|
|
Monkspider,
I fear that you're right they will fall back on civs that were used before, but
since there is no world balance now, I see no need to make it a multiple of 5
(also remember that not all the parts of the world are of the same size).
What they should do, but probably won't, is to use the material we Apolytoners have gathered on the civs we voted for. 
Personally I would love to play a westbound colonialism scenario introducing Spain, Portugal, the Dutch, the Inca (or rather Tiahuanaco, the Inca rule was just one dynasty of a prolonged empire) and the Maya, and an eastbound one adding Arabia, Polynesia and maybe Mali. Hmm, that makes 8 new cives already. 
If they correct the Iroquois leaders list and UU, which is easy enough, there should be no problem with having the Sioux in the game.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
asleepathewheel
|
|
listening too long to one song
Mar 2002 time: 00:18
|
|
quote: Originally posted by cyclotron7
I'm getting tired of this. Where's your factual basis for this? Every post you have made recently is only a bitter rant. |
the facts have never stopped Coracle before, I daresay they will in the future.
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:18. Apolyton Time is 00:18. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|