Apolyton Archive  |  Preserved copy of the Apolyton Civilization Site and its forums as they stood in September 2005. Read-only; nothing here can be posted to or replied to.  |  Forum index |  About this archive |  The 1998–2001 UBB forums
Today on Apolyton WARDELL INTERVIEW PROMO A.C.S. HISTORY CHAPTER 4 GET CIV4 /w FREE PLUS! A.C.S. PHOTO GALLERY GET A.O.M. V1.1
Apolyton Civilization Forums
main| civ2| civ3| civ4| smac| ctp2| ron| moo3| galciv| galciv2| alt| about|
ApolytonPLUS | register | search | faq | new posts | pm (-/-) | upload | members
hall of fame new! | civgroups | civgroups news | interviews | the column | radio | chat | directory | news | store | PLUS
Apolyton Civilization Forums : Powered by vBulletin version 2.0.3 Apolyton Civilization Forums > Miscellaneous > Archive > Civ3-Civilizations > UUs In Relation To A Civ's GA
Show a Printable Version | Email This Page to Someone! | Receive updates to this thread | Report this to Apolyton news!
16.Sep: 7 NEW FILES
15.Sep: TRIAL + NO SLEEP = ONE GAME
13.Sep: PATCH THE PREVIOUSLY UNPATCHABLE

bottom of page
   - CIV3 CONQUESTS $29.99 - CIV3 from $9.99
Author
Thread    < Last Thread     Next Thread > Post New Thread     Post A Reply
Signa is offline Signa
Warlord
IA, USA
Nov 2001
time: 23:17
  Old Post 16-04-2002 03:52 Visit Signa's homepage!
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#1 Report this post to a moderator
UUs In Relation To A Civ's GA Put an end to popups!

Just some random thoughs on the tread's topic...

Roman Legionairy
Golden Age was Pax Romana, following and during the reign of the first Caesar. Now, the Legionaries by then had been around since... at least the Punic Wars but I don't know when exact they origonated (I've head that the Legions developed about 600BC following the findings by the Romans that the Phalanx didn't work in alpine terrain, which Italy had a lot of). Anyways, since victories by ancient era units don't automatically trigger a Golden Age I guess the Legion follows the UU<->GA theory I have.

Greek Hoplite
Now, their is two periods of Greek prominence. First came right after the Greek victories of the second Persian war over Xerxes. If you consider this the Greek golden age then the obvious choice is the Hoplite. The other period of Greek prosperity was the Hellanistic Age, following Alexander III's conquests. Since he won due to his cavalry (bear with me...) then the choice for UU would be the Companion cavalry unit (Horseman w/ xtra Attack?). You could go either way, but Hoplite fits the Greek traits a lot better.

German Panzer
This I have a bone to pick with. Now, it is a matter of opinion, but I don't call the cold war a German gold period. They weren't really a country. Close, but divided on some big issues. The German Federal Republic did preatty well though, so perhaps would could make a case for the Panzer to fit the UU<->GA thing. But other golden times of Germany was either the period between unification or the feudal empires of Charlemagne, Otto I, or Barbarossa. Perhaps an improved Knight?

Chinese Rider
This is a decent one. China has had a very long history, and pinning down one small time at which it was at the height of its glory is hard to do. But the time in which Kublai Khan ruled probably fits the best. The choice of the Riders is obvious in relation to the Mongol Horse Archers, but it fits well with the dates.

Japanese Samurai
The Samurai seems to show up right after the end of the Yamato times and the beginning of the feudal society led by the Shoguns at Edo, and if you consider this the time of Japan's Golden Age then your Samurai fits. Now, unlike Germany, the time after WWII was a rather good time for Japan (in some ways [bear with me...]). Perhaps and improved Aircraft Carrier, Battleships (a Yamato?), or improved Fighter (Zero?).

Indian War Elephant
I don't want to really mess around with the Indian UU, for I don't really know enough about the history of the sub-continent to pass jugdment.

Aztec Jaguar Warrior
Now, I do not know exactly when the Aztec Empire was first formed, but it was only a few hundred years I believe. The Aztecs never really got advanced technologies, so keeping a low level UU fits in with them well, considering they used a force of en masse infantry (something similar to Jags) to conquer a nice little empire in modern Mexico.

Iroquois Mounted Warrior
This is a piece of crap. The Iroquois almost never used mounted troops due to the woodlands enviroments they lived in. The golden period of Iroquois was sometime after European contact, and as a lot of people said, they could hold off expansion into their lands. I'd like to see a unit called the "Brave" (or something) that's either a faster Archer or even a Musketman (I don't know if they used muskets, but I would imagine so...).

Egyptian War Chariot
Egypt is another of those really long lasting civilizations. Their golden age would obviously be sometime before Christ, but when exactly I don't know (I really don't think the Ptolemic times were a Golden Age). According to a few PBS shows I've watched Ramases II maintained a massive force of Chariots for war, lending me to think that about that time was the Golden Age. The GA<->UU fits well here overall.

Babylonian Bowman
This is easy to figure out. Either the reign of Hammurabi or Nebucenazzer II (spelled wrong, I know...). Either of which fits with the Bowman. Next question.

Russian Cossack
This is another persective one. The Cossacks would first see action either in the wars with Turkey, the 1812 invasion, or the conquest to the east (or is it west?). All three of these were about the same time. Is the period of Metternich the Russian golden age? Maybe... I'd opt for the period after WWII in which the Russians were perhaps the most powerful nation on earth for a short while. That means that a WWII unit would trigger the Golden Age. I'm think a T-34 (Tank w/ xtra Attack or maybe Movement).

American F-15
The description of the F-15E Strike Eagle on www.civ3.com seems to suggest that the American golden age would be triggered by the victory in the Gulf War. Yes, the 90's could be a Golden Age. Another alternative could be the Cold War times, parallel with the Russians. A Marine, Paratrooper, Bomber (B-17), or even Carrier could be used there. Another is a unit from after the 1775 Revolution, a time of territorial expansion (maybe a golden age...). A Minuteman perhaps (improved Musketman or Rifleman)?

French Musketeer
Musketeers accoring to the sites description are the royal guards of Louis XIV. This age of absolutism really isn't a golden age (from what I heard...). I'm out of ideas in this one...

Persian Immortal
Persian golden age was basically it's whole short (by historical standards) history up to Alexander's conquest. The Immortal fits in really well. Nothing more to be said.

Zulu Impi
I don't know much Zulu history but I assume this is good.

British Man Of War
The British golden age was the Industrial Revolution were about 1/4 of the world's land and 1/ 3 of the world's population where British. The Golden Age was triggered by the victories of Nelson and Wellington over Napolean. The Man Of War fits the time period. I've heard of perhaps allowing a Longbowman UU, but the War Of The Roses was hardly a Golden Age.

Please excuse some historical benders and numerous spelling and grammatical errors. Thank you.

Spiffor is offline Spiffor
Emperor
CPA - Evil Clone brigade
Nov 2001
time: 06:17
  Old Post 16-04-2002 04:44
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#2 Report this post to a moderator
Avatar Enlargement: We've got the solution

About French musketeers : Absolutism can be considered as a French GA, since 17th & 18th centuries witnessed France at its peak (in terms of cultural and economic influence in the western world). If the GA really was to be warlike, a unique rifleman (Napoleonic soldier) would fit :
During the Revolution, France was the first country to use massive conscription, and first invented nationalism (Germans invented their distinct nationalism shortly after). This nationalistic era lasted ca. 20 years, from 1793 to 1815, with the Napoleonic defeat at Waterloo.

Beren is offline Beren
Warlord
Holland
Mar 2002
time: 06:17
  Old Post 16-04-2002 10:35
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#3 Report this post to a moderator
Inflate your Upload Space

About the Panzer: Germany was the leading power in the end of the 19th century, (before 1871, Prussia.) A golden age then would seem more likely to me. For Hitler's Germany, they'd had to loose terrain, totally be blown to pieces, into recession, then rise again, grow a bit, returning to prominence. The time Hitler's Germany was the leading country has been short: something like 1937-1943.
The second reich had a much longer period: 1871-1916 (or even 1850-1916)

Herr David is offline Herr David
Chieftain
Aachen, Germany
Feb 2002
time: 06:17
  Old Post 18-04-2002 04:25
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#4 Report this post to a moderator
Support Apolyton, buy Civilization: The Boardgame

About the Cossack: The period after WW2 was a time with a lot of hardship, and the political situation was one of a stagnation. If I had to choose, I'd locate the Russian "Golden Age" in the 100 years before the French revolution. That was the time where the Russian empire expanded vastly, colonizing Siberia and bringing scores of nationalities under the rule of the Czars.

IMHO the period following the civil war were the golden age of the USA - unprecedented industrial growth, vast immigration, lotsa territories becoming states and most notably the settlement of the west really sped up.
But if you want to create a point in time where the Americans really start overunning the world, it ought to be the arrival of the first tanks. Quality tanks really aren't anything that the American forces in WW2 were renowned for, but the UU could be a cheaper tank unit called Sherman tank. Shermans were produced in enormous quantities and were a very visible sign of the vast economic superiority of the USA over the rest of the world.

Herr David is offline Herr David
Chieftain
Aachen, Germany
Feb 2002
time: 06:17
  Old Post 18-04-2002 04:35
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#5 Report this post to a moderator
Suffering from ads?

quote:
Originally posted by Beren
The second reich had a much longer period: 1871-1916 (or even 1850-1916)



[smartass]
Actually the second Reich can be pinpointed very easily: It lasted from January 18th 1871 (Wilhelm I. proclaimed German Emperor) to November 9th 1918 (Wilhelm II. abdicated the throne)
[/smartass]

Coracle is offline Coracle
Prince

Feb 2002
time: 00:17
  Old Post 18-04-2002 04:44
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#6 Report this post to a moderator
Support Apolyton, buy Civilization: The Boardgame

The Chinese Rider should be uniquely CHINESE, and although not common to all Chinese dynasties, it is very typical if the great T'ang Dynasty of the 8th century which was highly militaristic and expansionist with masive cavalry forces that even defeated Muslim armies. So there are no "Mongols" involved with that UU.

Alexander "won with his cavalry"?? Wrong. They were too small in number. He won with his phalanxes, which were in that period extremely offensive-oriented and all but unstoppable, especially the Macedonian version. If we could make scenarios in this game - and we can't - there could be a 4.3. or even 5.3 Macedonian/Greek phalanx, as thgere was in the Civ 2 Alexander scenario, if you recall it.

The English longbowman should be a UU; everyone else should get a crossbowman. And that unit was around before the War of the Roses.

MOW - should be increased in strength and speed, given blitz capability, and come after Navigation. (Hell, all naval units less galley should be stronger).

Iroquois are an imaginary generic American Indian civ, so don't worry about it.

I would NOT describe Stalin's Soviet Union as "A Golden Age".

If America had one Golden Age it came long before the F-15. Maybe after WWII, maybe before. A useless UU - change it to something such as a fast musketeer.

Musketeer. The game has too few units. The musketters of the early 1600's were very different from those of, say, 1800 when muskets not only had faster firing procedures and better firing mechanisms, but could carry a bayonet. Firaxis needed a "Musket Infantry" unit - I have Edited musketters to 4.6.1, so these should be 6.7.1.

What else is there but a Zulu impi?? They had one type of infantry. If Firaxis wanted to be smart they'd have picked a different African king, perhaps Menelek of Ethiopia in the 1800's.

Beren is offline Beren
Warlord
Holland
Mar 2002
time: 06:17
  Old Post 18-04-2002 10:40
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#7 Report this post to a moderator
Suffering from ads?

quote:
Originally posted by Herr David
[smartass]
Actually the second Reich can be pinpointed very easily: It lasted from January 18th 1871 (Wilhelm I. proclaimed German Emperor) to November 9th 1918 (Wilhelm II. abdicated the throne)
[/smartass]


Well, I ment when its golden age was. The periods I mentioned were these where Prussia/Germany was the leading power in Europe.

Swissy is offline Swissy
King
Chicago,IL,USA
Sep 1999
time: 23:17
  Old Post 18-04-2002 16:21
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#8 Report this post to a moderator
Re: UUs In Relation To A Civ's GA Support Apolyton buy from Amazon

quote:
Originally posted by Signa
Just some random thoughs on the tread's topic...


I'm think a T-34 (Tank w/ xtra Attack or maybe Movement).



Try extra defense, the forte of the T-34 was it's armour. The Germans did not have anything short of an 88MM AA gun firing armour piercing rounds that could penetrate a T-34 frontally.

civman2000 is offline civman2000
Emperor
of the Martian Empire
Jun 2001
time: 23:17
  Old Post 20-04-2002 08:00
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#9 Report this post to a moderator
Suffering from ads?

The cossacks, though independent, were Russia's allies in war throughout its early history...there 1st extensive fighting (though I'm no expert) would probably be at the begainning of Peter the Great's reign, which could be considered a GA...

civman2000 is offline civman2000
Emperor
of the Martian Empire
Jun 2001
time: 23:17
  Old Post 20-04-2002 08:05
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#10 Report this post to a moderator
Get a bigger avatar today!

quote:
there could be a 4.3. or even 5.3 Macedonian/Greek phalanx, as thgere was in the Civ 2 Alexander scenario, if you recall it.

I thought they were 3.1 in the scenario

quote:
I would NOT describe Stalin's Soviet Union as "A Golden Age".

It could be argued that even though it wasn't a GA by historical standards, the higher production and stuff of a civ GA fits. BUt that's wrong. THe production was just a bunch of poprushed factories

Ribannah is offline Ribannah
Queen
The Netherlands, Embassy of the Iroquois Confederacy
Aug 2000
time: 06:17
  Old Post 20-04-2002 18:54 Visit Ribannah's homepage!
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#11 Report this post to a moderator
Avatar Enlargement: We've got the solution

quote:
Originally posted by Coracle
Iroquois are an imaginary generic American Indian civ, so don't worry about it.


A simple change of UU (and great leaders) would right that.
The UU for the Iroquois, related to their golden age, should IMHO be a musketman that treats all squares as roads.

Signa is offline Signa
Warlord
IA, USA
Nov 2001
time: 23:17
  Old Post 21-04-2002 22:40 Visit Signa's homepage!
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#12 Report this post to a moderator
Support Apolyton

Now Let's Sum Up What I Have Heard:

Rome- Legion should be 4.2.1
Greece- Hoplite works
Germany- something related to the Second Reich
China- some sorta of Rider cavalry
Japan- after a little research the Samurai is perfect
India- still not enough info
Aztec Empire- no comments
Iroquios- Brave? 2.4.2 replaces Musketman
Egypt- just perfect
Babylon- no changes
Russia- guess the Cossack works after all
America- a WWII unit?
France- keep it the Musketeer
Persia- Immortal should be 3.3.1
Zululand- no complains
Britian- leaning towards Longbowman?

ChaotikVisions is offline ChaotikVisions
Prince
Oklahoma, USA
Apr 2002
time: 23:17
  Old Post 27-04-2002 07:01
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#13 Report this post to a moderator
Help yourself to an AD-FREE life

I don't think they need a different unit, just that the unit should be 2.2.2 instead of the 1.2.2 it is now. Also for the Iroqois I suggest a unit that replaces the longbowman instead, a "hunter"? They were good at ambushes and fast on there feet, so 3.2.2 maybe? Also maybe have a pumped up Destroyer for the americans? After the bombing of pearl harbor those and the aircraft carriers became the basis of the fleet, and they used them to great efficeny hunting down u-boats and other things. It'd be nice if each civ had one unique land and air/sea unit.

Beren is offline Beren
Warlord
Holland
Mar 2002
time: 06:17
  Old Post 27-04-2002 12:26
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#14 Report this post to a moderator
Support Apolyton, buy Civilization 2

I'd say:
Rome-Legionary
Greece-Hoplite
Germany-2nd Reichish
China-Rider
Japan-Samurai
India-War Elephant
Aztec-Jaguar Warrior
Iroqouis-Brave
Egypt-War Chariot
Babylon-Bowman
Russia-Cossack
America-Marine(Make it US-exclusive)
France-Musketeer
Persia-Immortal
Zululand-Impi
England-Longbowman(Make longbowman crossbowman)

Imp. Montezuma is offline Imp. Montezuma
Warlord
Kazakhstan
Dec 2001
time: 09:17
  Old Post 09-06-2002 01:14 Visit Imp. Montezuma's homepage!
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#15 Report this post to a moderator
Support Apolyton buy from Amazon

Germany - Landsknecht (Foot soldier replace Medieval Infantry or foot knight) after Knights GA XIV-XV Holy Empire age
America - Ranger (replaces Marine) GA late XIX- early XX after Civil War
England - no changes GA XVI-XVIII Age of fleet, Newton, Shakespear

Pythagoras is offline Pythagoras
King
Charlottesville VA
Jan 1970
time: 00:17
  Old Post 09-06-2002 03:17 Visit Pythagoras's homepage!
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#16 Report this post to a moderator
Support Apolyton, buy Alpha Centauri

I have to say that throughout the cold war, much of America's strength was derrived from its naval assets. More specifically, I think American's mastered the use of the aircraft carrier. I think America should get an aircraft carrier that can carry 1 extra plane or have one extra movement or both.

  < Last Thread     Next Thread > Post New Thread     Post A Reply
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:17.
Apolyton Time is 00:17.
    top of page
Rate This Thread:
archivepost
Forum Jump:
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
 




Contact Us - Apolyton Civilization Site - Support Us!

Building a better Apolyton through better information. Click here and take our poll!
Non-US visitors, click here!

Powered by: vBulletin Version 2.0.3
Copyright ©2000, 2001, Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.

Page generated in 0.0544 seconds (92.53% PHP - 7.47% MySQL) with 31 queries
Page Loading Time:

Support Apolyton: Amazon USA | Amazon UK | Amazon DE | Amazon FR |
Support Apolyton and get FREE PLUS, Buy from Chips&Bits: Galactic Civilizations | Galactic Civilizations: Deluxe Edition | Call to Power 2 | Civilization: The Boardgame | GURPS/ Alpha Centauri | Alpha Centauri | Civilization IV | Civilization III: Complete |


Front Page | Civilization IV | Civilization III | Civilization II | Call to Power II | Alpha Centauri | Master of Orion III
Rise of Nations | Galactic Civilizations | Galactic Civilizations II | Misc
Alt.Civs | Civ I | C:CtP I | About | News | Directory | Apolyton Store | Forums | Chat | Columns | Interviews | Newsletter
Scenario League | CSC | Clash of Civs | Spanish Site | CtP Maps | Cradle of Civ | WesW's Ctp1/2 Site | Civ3 Haven

apolyton.net | apolyton.com | civilization2.net | civilization3.net | civilization4.net | civilizationiv.info | calltopower.net | galciv.net | galciv2.net | moo3.net