 |
|
Yolky
|
|
Ontario Canada
Oct 2001 time: 00:19
|
|
With all what was happening I have lost some enthusiasim about MOO3 now. I am worried MOO3 will not be as we expected.
I hope I am wrong since the MOO series is one of my favorite series of all times.
Davor
|
|
|  |
 |
|
asleepathewheel
|
|
listening too long to one song
Mar 2002 time: 00:19
|
|
is it still slated for release in the third quarter? Early or late 3rd?
still looking forward to the game, though not as much. of course, i have bought so many bad games, I'm just hoping that it will be something I can play everyonce in a while, rather than play for a week and then stick it in the closet.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
tniem
|
|
Hope College
Apr 2000 time: 00:19
|
|
I see this game going down hill faster than CivIII. Trouble ahead, I am afraid....
|
|
|  |
 |
|
madmario
|
 |
Ithaca, NY
Aug 2001 time: 05:19
|
|
I don't see any reason to be excited at this point. The game seems like many 4x games, but with very snappy graphics. What makes it different?
I haven't given up all hope, but the game sounds very traditional at this point and not very different from other games I own or have played. I liked the idea of IFP's, of putting the eye of government on people, of ethos, the idea that I could win without having to focus super heavily on any one particular playstyle (combat, micromanagement, etc). I am very not thrilled about the council, the reduced set of victory conditions, and some other changes.
Now I am not being entirely fair. The space lanes, random science, automatic colonizing, these are interesting features. I haven't played the game yet either -- it may play really well even though it is somewhat traditional. It -may- even play very differently.
But before I was going to buy it hands down, and now I am going to carefully consider the purchase after reading the more critical reviews (there are a lot of fanboys out there so like civ 3, it might be hard to find a good reviewer). It still may be good, but I wil have to see.
I guess I am reserved at best. Maybe I've just been soured by other games and companies, but such is what it is.
-mario
Last edited by madmario on 27-04-2002 at 02:33
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Ozymandous
|
 |
Atlanta, GA
Aug 2001 time: 00:19
|
|
Well I for one cannot wait to have MOO3 come out so all the folks who love Moo2, but can't adapt to change, can bash it like the folks who loved Civ2 but couldn't adapt to Civ3 did.
Ah, for the record, this is a GAME, not the second (or first) coming of (insert favorite diety here). Get a grip folks!
Why is everyone so down and expecting the worst? None of you (or I) have even PLAYED a demo, much less the full game, so how can you say the game "sucks" (to paraphrase almost EVERYONE) without having every even SEEN it???
Games change as they are developed, yet a lot of people don't know to what degree they do change from design to shipment because NO OTHER company has EVER allowed the public to be a part of the process until now, with QS.
I don't blame QS (or ANY game company after seeing all the complaining and crap they have had to deal with) for saying they will never again have this process as exposed as it is now.
Would YOU like to have a group of faceless people only know a small aspect of what you did in your personal or working life and yet offer NOTHING BUT complaints on all the stuff you're doing wrong?? I know I wouldn't.
So... Go out and get a hobby, get OFF these boards (Apoly boards are amongst the MOST pessimistic and negative boards I have seen on the 'net, not the worst but in the top 5 easily), and just get excitied about the game WHEN IT SHIPS. 
Relax, it will make you better people...
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Ozymandous
|
 |
Atlanta, GA
Aug 2001 time: 00:19
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Stormhound
Sorry, but they have a long way to go to compare to the Delphi MOO3 board. The negativity you're seeing now relates to recent decisions made on the game, and again didn't compare to the firestorm over on Delphi. Prior to that, things here were much more positive (except for a few people who've now gone into "told you so" mode).
So far as going under intense scrutiny, you do have something of a point, though that part of things could've been better managed and is inevitable once any serious publicity starts. Even on Delphi, though, it wasn't a case of "nothing but" complaints...there was also a good bit of fan input and positive commentary. |
Yeah, been over at the Delphi MOO3 boards as well, that's why this place was in the top 5, the Delphi boards are ranked in the top 3, right behind Battle.net's boards and another I remember looking at breifly and then walking away from (can't remember the game or message board but it was *horrible*.
I agree, QS could have handled their boards better but essentially anytime you put anything up for public scrutiny, regardless of what it is, you'll always have *someone* from the peanut gallery *****ing about something, even if everyone is happy.
Heh, good input over at Delphi? You might find it, if you do nothing but patrol those unorganized and hard-to-navigate threads but I prefer almost any BBS that has the ultimate BB or something like here at Apoly and Civfanatics MUCH better. 
EDIT: Oh, and I am looking forward to the game even so. As long as it's not a poor sequal as Moo2 was to Moo1 then I'll be happy. I wonder if you'll be able to land on any planet right off the bat in MOO3 like you could in 2, or if you have to discover the tech's to land and survive ala Moo1, IMHO, Moo1 was the better game for a variety of reasons.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
strategy
|
|
Having not followed development for a couple of months, I must say it is really disheartening reading all that's been going on the past few months.
But frankly, what do QS care? After all, how much the game sells will not depend on the fans or how good it is (no judgements on that), but rather how many people they can get to buy the game based on the strength of its name and the reviews/adverts.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
strategy
|
|
I don't know when I've last seen a game that I though was worth $80. It's a couple of years since I last bought a game within 6 months of its release (haven't bought Civ III yet, though I probably will after the expansion comes out, as I expect it to drop in price).
The only reason publishers are able to release half-finished games and get away with it, is because people are dumb enough to allow them to, IMHO.
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:19. Apolyton Time is 00:19. |
top of page
|
|
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|