 |
|  |
 |
|
Ming
|
|
quote: Originally posted by GP
1. What type(s) of messages did you deliver? What types of audiences did you target? |
My clients that ran in the these types of magazines were McDonnell Douglas and Northern Telecom (now NORTEL), both accounts which I worked on for over 15 years each.
Obviously MDC was the bigger spender, as they were the largest defense contractor in the US at that time. We did generic "corporate" messages to make people feel like MDC was a good corporate citizen no matter what your political leanings were. We also did A TON of product specific advertising highlighting why MDC should either get a contract... or continue spending on contracts they already had. We did a lot of the"you are getting your money's worth with the F -15" type ads.
Also, if a program got in trouble... we were there. My favorate was when the guidence system for tomahawk cm's were having problems getting lost on terrain covered by snow because it was different than what the maps had... The head line was "Neither sleet, nor rain, nor snow shall keep the tomahawk from it's appointed rounds"... we won a few awards with that one 
We also did the ole, support the space station type messages, since we would profit from it.
For NORTEL... we did some advocacy advertising during the fight for Telecom Deregulation... but mostly in just NJ and CQ.
I'll admit we NEVER ran in Mother Jones for either
quote:
2. Did you consider using the Washington Post, New York Times or Wall Street Journal to hit your target? Maybe the Sunday opinion section of the NYT or WP?
|
The Washington Post was our biggest expenditure... but a lot of that was due to it's far higher out of pocket cost per insertion.
We helped create franchise ad postions around the regular features/columns that covered the "HILL". We also helped "persuade" the WSJ to create a specific "DC" edition, so we could buy it in an efficient manner with minimal waste.
We used the NYT when we thought we needed to strengthen our support against the more liberals members of the HILL.
quote:
3. NR and TNR aren't as much of counterparts as people say they are. (I know it is popular to do so...) TNR is more scholarly in tone than NR (analogy might be NPR and Limbaugh...although both mags are better than their radio analogues..) TNR is also more middle of the road than hard left. Where NR is pretty hard right. |
Today, your comments are pretty on target. It was different 15 to 20 years ago. TNR was much farther left and NR tried to be more scholarly, but both have changed over time. NR is more of a far right cheerleader now... and it's almost comical. TNR while trying to adress the popular center, still comes up with stuff that prompted this thread...
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:19. Apolyton Time is 00:19. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|