 |
|  |
 |
|
Ethelred
|
|
quote: Originally posted by KrazyHorse
Because we're not animals, and neither is he. The death penalty is wrong when alternatives to protect society exist. |
All humans are animals. Especially Charles Ng. Few animals are would do what he did so please don't insult the innocent kittens.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Rogan Josh
|
|
So would the US be happy to extradite a US citizen from the US to a country where the punishment was beheading or being tortured to death?
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Ethelred
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Sprayber
Yeah I was talking about the original intent of the thread. Someone already mentioned that the whole point was that the US failed to provide evidence supporting their claim. |
Yes the US did a lousy job at best. The US appears to have just claimed he was involved without showing evidence. Then they tried a bunch of exceedingly technical complaints about the guy. Those technaicalities might have had some use if the US had information that could not be divulged publicly at the moment. Since the Judge did not take advantage of the technicality I must assume the US did not even have secret evidence that showed much of anything.
Right now it looks like the US wanted him as a by product of guilt by association and was hoping to find admissable evidence after the Feds got their hands on him. Considering the way the Bush administration is trying to avoid dealing with US laws by treating these guys as war criminals they are going to have start producing evidence a bit stronger than a claim that someone might have been seen of the prescence of someone else.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Ethelred
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Rogan Josh
So would the US be happy to extradite a US citizen from the US to a country where the punishment was beheading or being tortured to death? |
Beheading would be OK I suppose. Tortured to death is another thing. I think that would go against quite a few international treaties. I would guess that the US never refused to extradite to France before they stopped using the guilotine. I don't the suppose the opportunity arose very often though.
Beheading is cleaner than the electric chair. Thats a pretty nasty method of execution and most states no longer use it.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Ethelred
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Sava
Beheading cleaner? You do realize that when you cut off the head, blood is going to go everywhere. |
Yes I do. But the corpse won't catch fire like Sparky has done in at least execution. In any case its over pretty quick. Electocution can take a while.
Both are sloppy.
I know a much better way. Just use a carbon dioxide absorber and a small volume of air. I saw Dr. Jonathon Miller do this on some medical series. Thats the Miller from the old Brittish comedy troupe Beyound the Fringe that included Peter Cook and Dudley Moore. Anyway he just slowly lost consciousness. If a stagehand hadn't removed the mask he would have died without ever noticing.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
MrBaggins
|
|
There is still enough juice to power neural operations for a few seconds afterwards... as to whether there is enough stored energy in the jaw muscles and tongue is a different matter... and there is no back pressure for the larynx to work.
Seems BS
To confirm... I do believe that the brain is 'aware of the damage' until stored energy runs out in a couple of seconds but is not necessarily able to do anything about it, such as speech.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Ecthy
|
|
Zhonghuà Rénmín Gònghéguó
Mar 2000 time: 06:19
|
|
yes, but you actually notice your own decapitaiton and are aware of it, right?
|
|
|  |
 |
|
MrBaggins
|
|
correct... not a nice way to go
since no means of death is instant, there is always awareness of bad things happening, within the brain.
The kindest way to go is the quickest; atomization by explosive, brain first.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Ecthy
|
|
Zhonghuà Rénmín Gònghéguó
Mar 2000 time: 06:19
|
|
what about being shot? like being shot into your chest (heart, maybe)... i´s it the same? do you notice there's something not wrong and then slowly (or maybe quickly) pass away in mind despite being unable to communicate outwards since seconds ago?
|
|
|  |
 |
|
MrBaggins
|
|
quote: Ecthelion wrote something in the manner of
what about being shot? like being shot into your chest (heart, maybe)... i´s it the same? do you notice there's something not wrong and then slowly (or maybe quickly) pass away in mind despite being unable to communicate outwards since seconds ago?
|
Interrupting the heart interrupts blood flow which provides the brain with energy. The brain can survive a few seconds with negative blood flow (all blood evacuating the head, not just 'still' blood which can provide some sustained sustinance to the brain.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
MrBaggins
|
|
yep... anything where the brain is not the first thing to be destroyed means that the brain will 'be aware' of massive damage, which we can interpret in very vague terms for this discussion, as agonizing pain.
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:19. Apolyton Time is 00:19. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|