 |
|
JohnMK
|
|
Seattle
May 2002 time: 21:19
|
|
What is the best strategy, that you have tried and empirically proven personally, that results in a more prolongued peace than is typical?
I'm getting very upset with my two neighbors constantly declaring war upon me. I have a huge military, probably an average of 4 units per city, but that's still not enough to stop them from thinking they can take me on.
Can someone reinvent the wheel here, and tell me how I should go about obtaining a lasting peace?
|
|
|  |
 |
|
JohnMK
|
|
Seattle
May 2002 time: 21:19
|
|
I've been nothing but peaceful. I have expanded rather aggressively though: I sent a settler to a chokepoint in the continent (Isthmus), and thereby prevented them from colonizing a (what I guess is, since I can't cheat and reveal the map) rather substantial part of the island/continent we're on. They seem to want to send settlers through it on a very regular basis.
Oh, and there is an iron mine on my side of the island, but it's not yet within my cultural influence. It will be shortly though . . .
Difficulty: regent.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
JohnMK
|
|
Seattle
May 2002 time: 21:19
|
|
I'm using a huge map.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Theseus

|
 |
The warmonger formerly known as rpodos. Gathering Storm! Apolyton Spirit!!
Apr 2002 time: 00:19
|
|
A couple of thoughts:
- No one has discussed it so far on this thread, but which specific AI civs are you dealing with?
- Relative strength plays a HUGE role in the AI civs decisions. I think it's on a bell curve... the absolute weakest and the absolute strongest civs are targets.
- I wouldn't be surprised if Soren had marginally increased aggression across the board in 1.21.
- I forget where I saw it, maybe in one of the chats with Firaxis, but IIRC the entire tenor of each game is determined early on... either the AI civs get "mad" and stay that way, or the world remains peaceful. (I make sure they're mad!!)
BTW, JohnMK, 4 units per city is not a huge military. In fact, I'm pretty sure the AI doesn't even consider that ratio. Rather, it's absolute strength... either sheer number of units, or, as I suspect post-1.21, weighted strength of all military units.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
JohnMK
|
|
Seattle
May 2002 time: 21:19
|
|
Germans and Russians.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
wohmongarinf00l
|
|
germans have a huge aggression level and the russians are not entirely peaceful....
matter of fact, u can expect a war with the germans at some point in any game.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
JohnMK
|
|
Seattle
May 2002 time: 21:19
|
|
How does one acquire vassal states?
|
|
|  |
 |
|
SSBLoveU
|
|
Trading with people will cut down the war . . . however, with some cultures, just wipe them out. Wiping them out will hurt your culture though.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Jethro83
|
|
Newcastle, Australia
Mar 2002 time: 15:19
|
|
Forget Germany, Russia, Japan or Rome or anyone else like that. If you're next to the Zulu, war is inevitable. I'd say the Zulu are the Lord's Believers of Civ III. War seems to be their only religion, and they are VERY devout. I've never had a game on any difficulty level where the Zulu haven't tried attacking me at least once (except when I enlisted them in a military alliance).
Of course, if you get them into a military alliance against someone else, they'll practice their warmongering religion over there. I was once at war with Russia (since they were allied with Babylon, a neighbour I had nearly wiped out). Since the Russians were overseas and my navy was pretty much non-existant, I enlisted everyone else against the Russians while I finished Babylon off. Greeks, Iroquois, Aztecs, Germans, Zulu and myself (Americans) were all allied against Russia. Each civ in this league of nations began sueing for peace after the 20 turns had expired. All except the Zulu, who were continuing to fight the war for well over 200 years. Eventually, they asked me for a new military alliance against Russia. Since Russia were my next target, I was more than happy to do it (Think about the cattle. Won't somebody PLEASE think about the CATTLE!!!). Every enemy I fought in that game, I enlisted the Zulu as allies against them. That kept me on good terms with them. I maintained good terms with Germany as well using this approach.
What I'm trying to say is... find a common enemy, so as to give the more aggressive civs a different channel with which to try and flex their military muscle. Make sure it is a powerful, at least moderately advanced enemy though, lest your aggressive allies actually gain an upper hand without your help, gain greater power and decide to use this power on YOU.
Also, I've found peace damn well near impossible to maintain (except in the earlier days of the game when I was playing on Chieftain).
|
|
|  |
 |
|
louiethelesbo
|
|
I maintain peace by continuously playing John Lennon singing "Give peace a chance" or "Imagine"....don't knock it...it realyy works,
|
|
|  |
 |
|
panag
|
 |
MY WORDS ARE BACKED WITH BIO-CHEMICAL WEAPONS
Oct 2000 time: 07:19
|
|
hi ,
peace , well , through power , military or economic , ........
seen a game with peace for 600 years , lol , that time was used to prepare for a world war , nukes and all , lol , .........
have a nice day
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:19. Apolyton Time is 00:19. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|