 |
|  |
 |
|
chegitz guevara
|
 |
Ft. Lauderdale, FL Communist Party of Apolyton
Jun 2000 time: 00:19
|
|
Goingonit, Armed revolutionaries need to eat and to hide. If they do not have the support of the population, they will quickly be destroyed. It's a very old story.
Lonestar, the number of Russian sponsored terrorists and death squads (and they did exist) were nothing more than a drop in the bucket compared to Western back ones. Even the Islamic terrorists are ametuers compared to the US. Taking one example, The US and South African backed terrorist group, UNITA in Angola, is responsible for the deaths of almost a million people, maybe more. Toss in RENAMO, the Contras, the Chinats, etc., etc., etc., and US backed terrorists and death squads have a death toll equalling Hitlers death camps.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Ramo
|
 |
Austin, Texas, USA
Oct 1999 time: 23:19
|
|
quote: The point, as you can see on the AI site and on Human Rights Watch, and as I mentioned in a previous post, is that there is no evidence of any such activity by the government prior to the Maoist insurgency. So this cannot be sluffed off as a case of "everybody is equally bad". The responsibility, as I said before, lies squarely on the backs of the Maoists. |
Well, seeing as how the Maoist rebels popped some 5 years after the absolutist Panchayat system collapsed, don't you think you're being a little rash? By judging 5 out of the 12 years of the government's existence, you think you can say that rebellion is the sole cause for state repression?
Even if the state was somewhat more tolerant of peaceful dissent prior to the Maoist insurgency, we're stilling dealing with a feudal regime, that needs major changes. The Maoists' solution is certainly one I disagree with, but make no mistake that state incompetence is the reason that the people considered other options in the first place.
Furthermore, attributing exclusive blame in this situation is absurd. Were the Bolsheviks innocent of their atrocities because of the actions of White armies?
quote: Taxes are voluntarily, though not necessarily happily, agreed to. Extortion, in this case, proceeds from the barrel of a gun. This has direct bearing on the alleged democratic nature of society in rebel-held areas. |

Taxes are voluntary? Really? So if I tell the IRS to **** off, I won't be hauled off to prison?
As far as I can tell, the only distinction between extortion and taxation is that an authority that "taxes" has much more power than one that "extorts."
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Arrian
|
 |
Kneel before Grog!
Jul 2001 time: 00:19
|
|
Though the domino theory got out of hand, it did have a basis in fact, as well-presented by Adam Smith above. After all, just about any communist movement I've heard of has stated worldwide revolution ("workers of the world unite!") as a goal.
One of my professors, in explaining the Cold War domino mentality in the US gov't, put it thus: you see, if you let Vietnam fall, then it will be Indonesia (wild eyes now), and then Australia (practically frothing at the mouth) and then... and then... OREGON!
So ya gotta stop those reds! By any means necessary! Ah, there's the rub. And so you slide down the slope to undeclared wars, CIA coups, financial and military aid to bloodthirsty despots, etc.
-Arrian
|
|
|  |
 |
|
chegitz guevara
|
 |
Ft. Lauderdale, FL Communist Party of Apolyton
Jun 2000 time: 00:19
|
|
The Domino Theory is rather valid, but not exactly the way it was formulated. Successful revolutions in one country often inpsire people in other countries (not necessarily nieghboring ones) to take up their own struggle for freedom. So, when Vietnam successfully tossed out the Americans, there were revolutions in Cambodia, Laos, Portugal, Mozabique, Angola, Ethiopia, etc. which in turn sponsored successful revolutions in Grenada, Nicaragua, and Iran, which in turn, spawned more revolutions. (That last wave of revolutions met up with the heavy hand of Ronald Reagan.) Then there were the Velvet Revolutions.
Freedom is a virus. If one group of people catch it, it tends to spread. 
|
|
|  |
 |
|
lord of the mark
|
 |
FUKCOV - Former United Kingdom Colony of Virginia
Dec 2000 time: 00:19
|
|
quote: Originally posted by chegitz guevara
The Domino Theory is rather valid, but not exactly the way it was formulated. Successful revolutions in one country often inpsire people in other countries (not necessarily nieghboring ones) to take up their own struggle for freedom. So, when Vietnam successfully tossed out the Americans, there were revolutions in Cambodia, Laos, Portugal, Mozabique, Angola, Ethiopia, etc. which in turn sponsored successful revolutions in Grenada, Nicaragua, and Iran, which in turn, spawned more revolutions. (That last wave of revolutions met up with the heavy hand of Ronald Reagan.) Then there were the Velvet Revolutions.
Freedom is a virus. If one group of people catch it, it tends to spread. |
Actually Cambodia fell before South VietNam. Laos had massive NVA intervention. Portugals revolution came precisely because the govt was mired in Angola and Mozambique. Portugal eventually avoided the Communist danger and made it to freedom. Something Angola and Mozambique are still in the process of doing. As is Ethiopia, once it overthrew the dictatorship that came to power in the '70's. Nicaragua has become a free democratic state, in which the Sandinistas have to compete, and usually lose , AFAIK.
LOTM
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:19. Apolyton Time is 00:19. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|