 |
|
centrifuge
|
|
I'm Definitely looking forward to the scenario editor, as long as events and user created units can be used.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
panag
|
 |
MY WORDS ARE BACKED WITH BIO-CHEMICAL WEAPONS
Oct 2000
time: 07:19
|
|
quote:
Originally posted by Steve Clark
Sorry to gloat in a new thread, but for some, this is what we have been waiting for all along. Imagine that, by Fall 2002, I and others (including those waiting for MP) will actually start playing Civ3. Thank you Firaxis for keeping your promise! |
hi ,
one could only hope , but i think that is shall like X-mas , and before its final , next year this time , due to the patches , ....
have a nice day
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
Steve Clark
|
 |
Colorado Springs, CO
Oct 1999
time: 22:19
|
|
quote:
Originally posted by panag
hi ,
one could only hope , but i think that is shall like X-mas , and before its final , next year this time , due to the patches , ....
have a nice day |
Ah, but that's the difference. Whereas with the needlessly complex regular game you need it to be fairly polished. But with scenarios, all one needs is just the barebones structure (and a very robust editor/events file), then my friends like Paul Cullivan (Kull), Capt Nemo, Shay and many other Civ2 Scenario HOFers can (hopefully) make elaborate, historically accurate and diverse scenarios. If it take one more year to make that happen, so be it. That's how long Civ2 took before we got really good custom scenarios...and the wait was well worth it because many, including me, are still playing Civ2 scenarios to this day.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
asleepathewheel
|
|
listening too long to one song
Mar 2002
time: 00:19
|
|
quote:
Originally posted by Grrr
What are you claiming? that you're a retard or a cheat? |
the former.
I don't see why you don't want to play retards. Its a good way to get a few easy kills early while learning the MP tricks.
I wouldn't cheat at the game. I want to legitimately kill people. erm, I mean civs.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
panag
|
|
MY WORDS ARE BACKED WITH BIO-CHEMICAL WEAPONS
Oct 2000
time: 07:19
|
|
quote:
Originally posted by Steve Clark
Ah, but that's the difference. Whereas with the needlessly complex regular game you need it to be fairly polished. But with scenarios, all one needs is just the barebones structure (and a very robust editor/events file), then my friends like Paul Cullivan (Kull), Capt Nemo, Shay and many other Civ2 Scenario HOFers can (hopefully) make elaborate, historically accurate and diverse scenarios. If it take one more year to make that happen, so be it. That's how long Civ2 took before we got really good custom scenarios...and the wait was well worth it because many, including me, are still playing Civ2 scenarios to this day. |
hi ,
ones ya play civ3 , ya cant let it go , ......
its much better then civ2 , ........
have a nice day
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
asleepathewheel
|
|
listening too long to one song
Mar 2002
time: 00:19
|
|
I agree that Civ3 is much better than civ2 at SP and now that scenarios will be in, makes it a more well rounded game.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
OldCharlie
|
|
Minneapolis
May 2002
time: 01:19
|
|
[QUOTE] Originally posted by panag
at least one person who like civ3 , .................any others out there , ........???
A great game has to evolve. Civ1 was great for it's time and it has evolved nicely. It's so wonderful to see a company which appaars to be dedicated to improving and supporting it into the future. I was worried for awhile when it seemed no one was working on the civ series.
I really appreciate the improved AI in Civ3. Now multiplayer will really be interesting.
|
|
| |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:19.
Apolyton Time is 00:19. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|
08-05-2002 23:31
(who here doesn't... No, I didn't count the whining newbees...
) 
that grrr won't play me 
|