 |
|
Monk
|
|
I don't think we're in Brønshøj anymore
Jan 1970 time: 06:19
|
|
But when viewers of pornography begin to see the portrayed naked men or women as sexual objects, then it can become harmful.
Didn't you tell me that your sexuality was something you were born with, as opposed to a reflection of your environment? Then there's no harm in this.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Monk
|
|
I don't think we're in Brønshøj anymore
Jan 1970 time: 06:19
|
|
What does theories of sexual orientation development have to do with my comment on pornography??
Your comment on pornography is a claim your sexuality undergoes constant change. If you your perceptions of "sex objects" and stuff like that can change, then your sexual orientation can't be "written-in-stone" either.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Monk
|
|
I don't think we're in Brønshøj anymore
Jan 1970 time: 06:19
|
|
I'm smoking Marlboro and occasionally Marlboro Lights, but I've run out tonight (edit - ran out?)and the 7-eleven is a hell of a long way to drive by bike! That's the very reason I'm sitting here all alone in the dark trying to figure out which parts of your sexuality you think can change and which ones can't.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Ned
|
 |
of Aptos, CA
Oct 1999 time: 21:19
|
|
Porn is neither good nor bad. It offends some. It pleases others. Because it does offends some, it should not be "public." But a society that bans even private "porn," is a society that is not free.
Freedom is the real issue here.
Ned
Last edited by Ned on 17-05-2002 at 03:00
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:19. Apolyton Time is 00:19. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|