 |
| |
|
|
Alanus
|
 |
du bon peuple de France (et de Bretagne)
Aug 1999
time: 06:19
|
|
So Firaxis has selected Joan of Arc to be the leader of the French. Poor little shepherdess who was burned as heretic ! 
As always the choice of civ leaders generates a debate, so let's debate on Joan vs. Napoleon or others.
Napoleon I (Buonaparte, the little Corsican) is the default French leader in CTP.
He put Europe in fire during 20 years in the early 19e century and was eventually defeated in Waterloo (Belgium) in 1815 by the British and the Prussians. In the mean time, he conquered almost all Europe (except for Great-Britain, but nobody did since William the Conqueror in 1066). Quite a good candidate for a civ leader, even if not necessarily the nicest guy on earth. Anyway, except for the Britts who named one of their stations with the name of a defeat (Waterloo  ), there have been a lot significant progress of the French civilization during his reign and some benefits are still lasting.
Louis XIV (le Roi Soleil, king 1643-1715) is the default French leader in Civ2.
He is certainly the most famous of all the kings of France and you all know the Versailles Palace that was built under his leadership. He was The Absolut Monarch of all the French history. Obviously there were many wars during his reign, but I suppose that the slaughtery have been less concentrated in time than during the Napoleon's period. Also a good candidate for a civ leader.
Now, what's left for Joan of Arc (la Pucelle - Virgin- d'Orleans 1412-1431). OK she is a Saint (since 1920). OK under her leadership, the Crown of France was saved and she defeated the English, thus allowing the poor coward Charles VII to be the King of France. But she did not govern any kingdom or empire, she did not conquer any territory. So why select her as a civ leader. Not to mention that she is now used as a herald by the French nationalist party  (not the kind of people I would recommend) of whom we have heard too much recently during the President's election.
So what do you think ? Other candidates could be :
- Charles de Gaulle, leader for the free France during WWII and president from 1958 to 1968
- Vergincetorix, prince of the Gauls (72 BC - 46 BC) who was defeated by Julius Ceasar at Alesia
- Clovis, first king of the Francs (465-511)
- Charlemagne (Carolus Magnus) king of the Francs (768-814) and emperor of the Western empire (800-814)
- and others, we have plenty ...
So, what would be your choice ?
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Coracle
|
|
You know that Clovis is the name of Mayor Quimby's beer-swilling brother who ran over Snowball I??
I changed to Joan to Napoleon months ago and downloaded new heads.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
TheBigTurkey
|
|
Nappy, cuz their GA (taking over all of Europe) was under him. Plus, Louis dressed like a woman. I'd rather have Jeanne than him.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Jethro83
|
|
Newcastle, Australia
Mar 2002
time: 15:19
|
|
Straight up:
NAPOLEON
Though there's a good case for Louis XIV, Charles de Gaulle and Charlemagne. But I still go with Napoleon.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Spiffor
|
 |
CPA - Evil Clone brigade
Nov 2001
time: 06:19
|
|
Some history bits in a French point of view
De Gaulle :
For the French, Charles de Gaulle is a kind of national hero, a father of the Republic. He's considered as the first resistor to the German oppression during WW2 (he broadcasted his call for resistance the day of the French defeat). He represented free France to the other countries, and was the first French governor after WW2 but retired early (1946) because he didn't wanted to compromise himself with the treachery of negociation between parties.
He came back in 1958 to "save" the Republic from a coup due to the Algeria war. He promoted a new constitution, where the power ws centred on the President and not on the Parliament. He reigned between 1958 and 1969 and shared almost none of his power. But what pleases is the style : he didn't hesitate to say "get lost" to someone who disturbed him (ministers, journalists, foreign heads of state). He also acted for the independance of France, by developing our own atomic force and getting out of NATO (France remains in the Atlantic Alliance and will defend western countries in case of an attack, but its troops are only directed by French). He was the president during the economic boom, and it's possible to say that De Gaulle his responsible for France being in the Top 5 countries.
He didn't retired because of general unrest : in France, May 68 ended by a huge demonstration (1 million people) supporting him. He retired one year later, because one of his plebiscit-referendum wasn't good for him (he used referendums to see how much the French liked him, he always told he would quit if the referendum wasn't good for him... he did)
Basically, htere was a kind of Golden Age during his reign (a small one, but still), so he applies for being the French ruler, at least in the point of view of French people.
Louis XIV :
A megalomaniac and such. But still, he clearly rationalized the Franch state, by implenting an efficient bureacracy for the time. He was a work-addict (as much as a control freak), and spent whole days at his desk, which was pretty rare for a king at this period. I think the true French GA was under his reign : rich culture, population boom, military successes, economic growth with the first ecomic policies (which are now a tradition in France). Most French movies about our past are about this period, rather than middle ages or industrial era. Even if I think the musketeers are a lame unit, it's true the golden age was pretty much during this period. Louis XIV, whatever his dresses are, applies well to be the French leader.
Napoleon :
Basically, a political and military genius, completely megalomaniac. There weren't that many things during his reign : the Germans were the big culture-producers of Europe at this time, industrial revolution still didn't arrive in France, the progresses made during the revolution were mostly lost. But there was an incredible conquest, and Napoleon is THE hero of every civer. I think that's why he must be the French leader (unless we have a Corsican civ, but I doubt it  )
Charlemagne :
He's famous ! But maybe not under this name. He's called Karl der Grosse by the Germans, who think of him as a German (he himself didn't think of him as a German or French : he spoke latin). Maybe the English call him Chales the Great or something. He had a huge empire for the early middle ages standards, extending from the Pyrennees to middle Germany, and made some cultural achievments (created schools and such). He was one of the most stable authorities of the early middle ages. At his death, his empire was divided between his 3 sons, the western part became France something like 150 years later. The first "king of France" (officially speaking) was Hugues Capet, at the end of the 10th century.
Clovis :
Famous in France : the leader of the Germanic raiders which settled down on the territory (the Franks) 1500 years ago. He was one of the first barbarians to convert to catholicism, which allowed the Church to be powerful on the French territory, and it allowed the churches not to be burned down, which let some places standing where knowledge was conserved during the whole feudal era. Because of him, France is called by Catholics "the oldest daughter of the Church". Important in the French history, but not in a Civ point of view.
Vercingetorix :
A Celt leader, while the French are mostly latin. He unified the divided Gaul-Celts against Caesar, being the first (and only) Celt great leader on the mainland. He won against Caesar at Gergovia but lost at Alesia few years later, where he surrendered for the sake of his people starving under the siege. He died 6 years later in a Roman prison. Although his tale is taught to every French child, it's not even sure he existed : only Caesar mentions him in the "War of Gauls", but it's possible he invented a leader comparable to him to gain more prestige. Also, I heard Vercingetorix means "chief" or something in Celt.
So, as a conclusion, I'd see de Gaulle or Louis XIV as good French leaders, but the Civ logic dictates it's Napoleon, simply because he's loved by civers. I can't understand they put Joan instead.
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
siredgar
|
 |
New York, NY
Nov 2001
time: 00:19
|
|
Louis Quatorze was a PIG! He ruined France. In fact, most historians judge him a failure and some attribute his deeds as reasons for why the English surpassed the French in the colonial race, etc.
Anyhow, his reign came when France was already at the height of its empire. Instead, it is people that play pivotal roles in a civilization's history that should be the great leaders, not those who benefit from their predecessors' work. Louis was part of the generation that spent it, not made it.
For example, while I believe FDR was the greatest American leader, it was Abraham Lincoln that kept the union together. Soon thereafter, the U.S. began its journey to become one of the most powerful nations in the world. Imagine if Lincoln did not keep the nation together. The U.S. would only be a major power, not a superpower.
Likewise, while I prefer Napoleon, it was Joan of Arc who preserved the French nation. That's why she's not such a bad choice after all.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Darkworld Ark
|
|
of the Capitalists
May 2002
time: 05:19
|
|
I myself like Napoleon for three reasons :
1 - He conquered a large amount of Europe
2 - It was Napoleonic troops who found the Rosseta Stone during their conquest of Egypt, allowing us to learn alot more about Egypt
3 - He was the first Anti-Christ, which might not be a good thing, but it sounds cool.
The only reason (in my view) that Joan of Arc is the French leader is that they needed more female leaders. (I think Catherine should have been Stalin or Lenin)
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Darkworld Ark
|
|
of the Capitalists
May 2002
time: 05:19
|
|
quote:
Originally posted by Whoha
3)I seriously doubt he was the anti christ
|
That crazy guy who predicted the future (his name excapes me) said (although not directly) that Napoleon was the first of the threeanti-christs. (Hitler was the second, Saddam might be the third)
Last edited by Darkworld Ark on 18-05-2002 at 07:35
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:19.
Apolyton Time is 00:19. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|
15-05-2002 02:56
and Napoleon took over, first as Consul, then as Emperor.
. It is a real character, though of course the Three Musketeers is a novel where his adventures have been invented.
|