17-05-2001 00:18									#1
	The Camel is Dead! Help yourself to an AD-FREE life

from the gamespot preview

quote: Firaxis is focusing much of its efforts on creating a more dynamic and entertaining trade system than the one found in previous games. "Trade was really abstract in the two [previous Civilization] games," Briggs said. "You would build caravans and move them yourself from city to city, moving them in the right place. I thought that was cumbersome." To change all of that, Firaxis is implementing two types of resources--luxury items and strategic resources--and depending on your strategy, you will want to make a concerted effort to control as many resources as possible. If you don't control as many valuable resources as other civilizations do, then you can either take the resources by force or establish strong trade relations.

	17-05-2001 00:25									#2
	Inflate your Upload Space

so you mean they will trade with out camels? how will the goods get from one place to another?
[This message has been edited by ancient (edited May 16, 2001).]

	17-05-2001 00:46									#4
	Full PM-box? Change here!

I get the feeling that it will be some sort of negotiations between civs.
since it depends on what resources are connected to your Capitol, I guess you would make trade agreements with a neighboring civ for useful items

such as:
"we see that your civilization, although nearly insignificant, may be of some use to us in supplying us with silk. We are prepared to trade horses with you in exchange"

Agreed. let's make this trade agreement.
No way, we don't need your useless horses.
We would prefer you to supply us with Iron


That's what I'm currently envisioning. it seems to make sense, since they have indicated that any cities connected to one with a special resource will have access to it. so I suppose that if you make a trade agreement, all your connected cities could take advantage of it.

	17-05-2001 00:50									#5
	Support Apolyton, buy Galactic Civilizations: Deluxe Edition

but camels are cool..

	17-05-2001 02:24									#7
	Increase Your PM Length

True, it would seem that "connectivity" is the key word now, and the physical action required is building the road.

In a sense this new way is wiser because road-building IS trade route building; but I confess to being one of those who spent many a Civ 2 game doing little else but happily moving my camels around the map setting up trade routes. I can envision enjoying building roads, etc., if the emphasis is on clarity and functionality, which are VERY different from simply being "hassle-free" (see CTP).

Hassle-free I don't need; direct control over imagining and creating my trade empire, YES, and to that end I must say I'm encouraged...

	17-05-2001 02:33									#8
	Support Apolyton buy from Amazon

May the Camel rest in peace. Amen.
I never loved that loooong voyage till a distant city, just in time to discover they don't need my goods anymore, nor I liked to forget where the beast was going, if anything stopped it mid voyage.

I agree, SMAC was too much automated, not funny. It seems Firaxis is doing better this time.

	17-05-2001 03:26									#10
	Suffering from ads?

Don't know. I kinda loved the incertainty of the long voyage, the protection it required, the planning. The rush of making it to the city and get the gold and science was pretty good too.

	17-05-2001 05:15									#11
	Support Apolyton, buy Alpha Centauri

"I kinda loved the incertainty of the long voyage, the protection it required, the planning. The rush of making it to the city and get the gold and science was pretty good too."

I agree. I'll miss the camel (and truck) as well.

	17-05-2001 05:36									#12
	Tired of ads?

I personally invision a need for caravans to trade. I see three basic ways caravans (and possibly tradeships) could possibly still be implemented with this new system.

1.as in ctp you wont acctualy move them but you might need so many to make a trade route. and once it is established with a certain civ you can trade as much as you want.

2. (still using the unseen units) or you might need so many caravans for each trade route no matter how many routes allready excist between you and the civ.

3. finally you might need to move a caravan to establish a trade route with the civ, but once it is established, you can trade whatever you want.

but then again they might do away with caravans completely.

	17-05-2001 05:46									#13
	Increase Your PM Length

They should implement trade by using a "Trade Screen" where your diplomats can trade for better rates based on your congeniality rating with the enemy nations.

	17-05-2001 07:12									#14
	Support Apolyton buy from Amazon

I want a minigame shoot-the-camel, for me it would be just as fun as the earlier discussed shoot-the-herald. After Civ3 comes out and you guys have a break at Firaxis, would someone please design these games for the more vicious of your Civ followers?

	17-05-2001 08:13									#15
	Suffering from ads?

Trade between civs should be done/managed by trade agreements and constructing the right infras.

Once trade agreement is made, trade route can be established. Then you assign your caravans(if the route is land based)or merchant ships(if the route is water based)to the specific trade routes.


Athens(Greek)<--------------------------->Alexandria(Egyptian)
25 merchant ships assigned

Corinth(Greek)<-------------------------->Crete(Cretan)
18 merchant ships assigned


Athens(Greek)<-------------------------->Ukraine(minor civ/tribes?)
20 caravans assigned

You don't have to move each merchant ship or caravan but those ships and caravans are simply shown in your civ's trade capacity pool.

	17-05-2001 15:21									#16
	Support Apolyton, buy Civilization 2

Well we coped fine on SMAC without having to manually establish trade like this. It would be nice to see something a little more sophisticated than SMACs...but when I had a large empire in Civ2 and had to haul vast numbers of caravans/freight to optimal points around the world could get to be very mindnumbing. A special menu for it would be ideal. Just click on it...although perhaps it may be interesting to have some kind of maintenance for a merchant navy required depending on the size of your trade interests.

	17-05-2001 15:44									#17
	Help yourself to an AD-FREE life

The most compelling reason for removing the camel/truck is the ability to instantly build a Wonder. Multiple cities should be able to assist such giant projects but not stockpiled in advance of their discovery.

	19-05-2001 01:25									#18
	Support Apolyton

checking the gamespy preview Snapcase turned us on to, it seems that trade is now incorporated into the diplomacy screen.

Sid Promised us that we would be able to negotiate for just about anything in diplomatic negotiations, and it seems that he has. check the diplomacy screen sreenshot.

it looks like goods to be traded will be just one more thing up on the bargaining table. Fascinating.

	19-05-2001 01:31									#19
	Support Apolyton, buy Galactic Civilizations

About the demise of the camel...

The Good:
having it as part of diplomacy and interciv bargaining chips makes a lot more sense than the involuntary trade routes that persist through thick and thin. I listen to the news and hear various nations bickering about those very things.
I am also going to enjoy the fact that war deprives enemy nations of our trade goods, giving them and us an incentive for peace.

The Bad:
I'm going to miss those gold and science bonuses.

	19-05-2001 01:33									#20
	Support Apolyton, buy Civilization 2

Father Beast, I interviewed someone inside the Civ franchise for my next column that speaks to the heart of the camel issue. I think you'll be surprised...

	19-05-2001 01:50									#21
	Inflate your Upload Space

The Camel is dead. Long Live the Camel.

	19-05-2001 19:50									#23
	Support Apolyton, buy Civilization 2

Camels were very realistic way to represent trade in ancient and middle ages (think in Roman boats to Indian silk rivers or Marco Polo's private initiative to establish a trade route between Mongol's Beijing and Venice), but the last proposal (included as diplomacy option) is more realistic for modern times.

Cannot there be the two options, timely separated (by an advance, for example)?