 |
|
LDiCesare
|
|
La Ferté sous Jouarre France
Jan 2001 time: 05:19
|
|
I would be more interested in a comparison with "standard" civ2 (2.42 , MGE/FW) in order to be able to adapt strategies a bit. For instance I drool every time I see OCCs where people managed to stay at peace with the AI in the late part of the game. The AI in ToT seems to always want to attack in the end game.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Eyn
|
|
Lyon, FRANCE
Jan 2000 time: 05:19
|
|
i do not understand the interest of a strategy guides for civ2 scenarios. one tips/hints guide to help newbies to start a "original" game why not, but still u have understand how the game rules, make your own choices !
"The problem lies in the relatively small audience", yes, that's right, no mapeditor and no "compatibility" with MGE when the games comes... that's unfair, ToT is the best Civilization game ... for scenarios creation
|
|
|  |
 |
|
LDiCesare
|
|
La Ferté sous Jouarre France
Jan 2001 time: 05:19
|
|
My problem is mainly about comparisons. Since there are so little ToT comparisons out there, I wonder what the best AC landing is in ToT. Same for OCC. I believe it is harder than 2.42, MGE, etc. but have no proof.
Same on playing comparison games. I'd like to, but am afraid that the AI will be so pissed off that it cannot compare to other versions.
As for scenarios, it is a pity we have to convert them, but that can be done. Can conversion of .sav games be done too? I'd like to try a few of the OCC comparison games if I could...
Now I guess I got off topic a bit here...
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:19. Apolyton Time is 00:19. |
top of page
|
|
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|