 |
|  |
 |
|
Hurrying Heinz
|
 |
of the Gulag Archipelago
Jun 2002 time: 21:19
|
|
Here are the civ traits which I think will be associated with each of the new civs on PTW.
Vikings - Militaristic, Expansionist
The Vikings were known for their strong army and they were some of the worlds greatest explorers, eventually making Settlements in Iceland, the New World, and Russia. They also explored the Mediterranean and raided Visigoth camps in Iberia.
Carthagenians - Commercial, Expansionist
The Carthagenians were one of the worlds first naval powers whos ships carried cargo far and wide. They also settled in North Africa, Spain, Sardinia, and Sicily
Spanish - Religious, Militaristic
The Spanish conquistadors single-handedly conquered all of Latin America in the name of God and country.
Mongols - Militaristic, Commercial
Their 'hordes of horsemen' created the worlds largest empire. They also traded with Marco Polo
I was gonna say originally Militaristic, Expansionist, but I don't think that they would include two civs with the same traits.
Celts - Religious, Expansionist
These guys believed in their village shaman (Panoramix). Not sure about the expansionist part
Koreans - Scientific, Industrious
Invented Ironclad and printing press. Not sure about Industrious. Maybe Yin can tell us about them.
Incans - Scientific, Religious
The Incans had a very accurate calendar, and beleived in a plethora of gods and goddess
Whats the last civ?
Note: To all threadjackers.
This is a free zone
|
|
|  |
 |
|
monkspider
|
 |
banned
Aug 2001 time: 23:19
|
|
No one knows for sure who the last civ is, smart money right now is on either the Koreans, or Hebrews, with the Inca still having an outside chance.
Here's my take on the Civ specific traits
Spanish- Religious, Militaristic (just like their dear friends, the Aztecs )
Mongols- Militaristic, Expansionist
Vikings- Expansionist, Commerical
Celts (and no, i'm still not calling them the Gauls)- Religious, industrious (they built stone hedge and stuff )
Carthage- Commercial, industrious (I don't know what else they would be besides commercial and someone else needed the industrious trait)
Ottomans- scientific, militaristic
Arabs- Religious, expansionist
------------------
Hebrews- Religious, Commercial
Koreans- Scientific, religious
Inca- Industrious, scientific
|
|
|  |
 |
|
nostromo
|
 |
Montréal, Québec
Mar 2002 time: 00:19
|
|
Overall, I pretty much agree with your speculations. You're assuming however that each new civ will have two traits. But Firaxis may well try to surprise us. Maybe some civs will have one trait, instead of two. Spain, for example, could be an expansionist civ, and nothing else. Of course, you can't give one trait to a civ, and leave it at that. Maybe Spain could start with more money, or with an additional settler. Moreover, Firaxis could add new civ traits (but that's unlikely...).
|
|
|  |
 |
|
foo12
|
|
Perhaps Firaxis has added a few new traits in the PTW?
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Jethro83
|
|
Newcastle, Australia
Mar 2002 time: 15:19
|
|
This is what I might be thinking, though I am doubtful with some of them.
Spanish - Militaristic, Religious
Arabs - Expansionist, Religious
Mongols - Militaristic, Expansionist
Carthaginians - Commercial, Expansionist
Celts (NOT Gauls, CELTS!!!) - Religious, Industrious
Koreans - Scientific, Industrious (if they get included)
Incas (hopefully included) - Scientific, Religious
Vikings - Militaristic, Commercial
that is, if they don't include new traits.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Mikhail
|
|
flesh.and.binary
Mar 2002 time: 23:19
|
|
Spanish: Religious, Expansionist
(Militaristic? Just because their guns and armor were extremely capable of killing Native Americans, hardly means they had a large or strong military. Militaristic is primarily for generating Great Leaders. How many great leaders were spawned by the colonization slaughter?)
Mongols: Militaristic, Expansionist
Gauls (btw, Gaul is a better choice than Celt. Including "Celts" would be like including a "European" or "Native American" Civ. 'Celt' is too vague.): Industrious, Religious
Arabs: Religious, Commercial (Oil: A cup of Arabian culture)
Ottomans: Militaristic, ??? (don't want to use religious a third time)
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Amadan
|
|
As an outside possibility (boldly jumping into the fray): Each Civ could have three traits instead of two. That would bring the number of unique combinations from 15 to 20, without adding new traits (although that would be nice).
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Jethro83
|
|
Newcastle, Australia
Mar 2002 time: 15:19
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Mikhail
Spanish: Religious, Expansionist
(Militaristic? Just because their guns and armor were extremely capable of killing Native Americans, hardly means they had a large or strong military. Militaristic is primarily for generating Great Leaders. How many great leaders were spawned by the colonization slaughter?) |
Does the name Hernando Cortéz ring a bell? How about Francisco Pizarro? I'd say they do qualify as great leaders. BTW, Militaristic has nothing to do with the chances of a great leader appearing. It only means quick promotions and cheaper military buildings.
quote: Ottomans: Militaristic, ??? (don't want to use religious a third time) |
I wouldn't say that the Ottomons could be considered 'religious' at all. They do go down in history as devout muslims, but not devout enough to earn the Religious trait.
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:19. Apolyton Time is 00:19. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|