 |
Should we have provincial governors?
This poll is closed. |
| Yes |
   |
26 |
50.98% |
| No |
   |
25 |
49.02% |
| Total: |
51 voters |
100% |
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
punkbass2000
|
 |
Waterloo, ON, Canada
Feb 2002 time: 00:20
|
|
quote: Originally posted by civman2000
so in other words the city planner is no more than a governor...
TEchnically, we could end up not having governors: If the prez doesnt want to make any provinces AND the people don't post a poll to overrule him we will just have one big province ! |
To a certain extent, yes. However, the city planner has more authority than governor, is higher on the CoC, and has other responsibilities. If that Board (whatever it's called) materializes, the city planner would have a lot of say. Also, typically the first ten cities are the most important, and by the time they have been found the most important decisions have been made, IMO. Every choice made in the first 50 turns or so impacts the rest of the game exponentially. Also, the city planner will post polls for what to build in situations where there are many possibilities or objections to current build queues. In the long run, let's say we have 100 cities (pretty likely, considering map size), do you really want a single person making the build queues for all of them? It would be exhaustive, time-consuming work for one thing, and it was also be very unilateral, as the city planner would obviously not hold a poll for every build queue between every turnchat.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Space05us
|
|
Dang! that's the closest poll I've ever seen.
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:20. Apolyton Time is 00:20. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|