 |
|  |
 |
|
Darius871
|
 |
Smith, Wesson, and the RODINA!!!
Mar 2002 time: 23:20
|
|
quote: Originally posted by El Awrence
Kobra, what's your email? Japan would like to discuss this issue with Britain. |
If you mean what I think you mean, I'd like to see what good your ships can do against Manila's coastal guns.
quote: Originally posted by Kobra
What is the Russian, French and Japanese stand on this? |
I won't speak for them, but German influence over the Ottoman Empire was a major tenet of the Prusso-Russian alliance, so I'm guessing he would back me on this.
As for France I don't know, since we haven't communicated much, but we are allied, and they have no love for the British. Furthermore none of us fear you.
quote: Originally posted by Kobra
Will you be loyal allies or will you use common sense? |
Speaking of 'loyal allies', I highly doubt the United States will sacrifice thousonds of their sons so that Britain can rape a few more imperial possessions (more specifically, the German Foreign Ministry got this impression through private correspondence).
Since you never bothered to publicly claim Iraq for yourself, I fail to see how it is somehow in your sphere of influence. We claimed it first, and we now have enough military presence in the region to back that claim. With your naval power and far-reaching colonial possessions, you have more than enough other regions you could subdue. The Ottoman Empire was already allotted to the German sphere of influence months ago after intense negotiations within the Continental Bloc. You have NO such a claim to the region except that you merely 'want' it.
Last edited by Darius871 on 24-05-2003 at 18:00
|
|
|  |
 |
|
JamesJKirk
|
 |
Dixon, CA USA
Jan 1970 time: 21:20
|
|
The Russian Republic stands proudly behind our eternal Continental allies. If Britain has had a claim to Baghdad, she should have made it first, and not secretly have gone and attempted to cast her yoke over the city before any other power knew what happened. This sort of backdoor conquest cannot be tolerated.
Also, Britain cannot think to seriously lay claim to Tehran, Kabul or Kandahar any more than Russia could claim Timbuktu. Britain has tried twice to colonize Afghanistan and failed dismally on both counts. This would hardly constitute a sphere of influence. And your units are so far from, and your support lines are already so long, that it doesn't make any sense to claim Tehran, particularly since our troops are operating in its area, it will prove essential to Russian rail development, and it has traditionally been in our sphere of influence. And rest assured that we have not ceded that to you.
Your blitzkrieg bullying may have worked for you thus far, but the nations of the Continental Alliance stand united against your might-makes-right attitude, and as we have strength to counter yours, we will ensure that this expansion for the sake of expansion mentality can not continue.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
EmuGod
|
|
Panama Liberated!!
The United States of America proudly wishes to announce the liberation of Panama and her canal from the Colombians. Following an intense bombardment from an American steam frigate, American cannons landed in Panama City and destroyed the remainder of the Colombian cannons garrisoned there. The battle was fierce and left the steam frigate with heavy damage.
Honolulu Falls!
the US Pacific Forces made further gains early this month following a naval attack on Honolulu, the capital fo the Hawaiian islands. American forces landed in Hawaii and proudly raised the Stars and Stripes over the long chain of islands. This has brought the important naval base at Pearl Harbor under American control.
Haiti Under Blockade
Santo Domingo, the Haitan capital, has been put under seige by American artillery. The American navy is also near the island, ready to aid in the offensive on the island planned for July. The United States requests that the German and Japanese ships near Haiti steer clear of the island for their own safety.
President Addresses Foreign Powers
President Riggins announced in his home state that the United States has no intention of providing military support to the British Empire in case of war with the European Continental Bloc. However, the President urged Germany to accept Britain's peace proposal or another one that would make the borders of the Middle East permanent. He also addressed America's expectations that American shhips will be allowed to leave foreign waters in case of war. "I expect the nations of Europe to allow our ships safety from any war." he told his audience and addressed the Russian navy's blockade of the Dardanelles that has left an American trade ship in the Black Sea. The United States wants the Russians to allow this ship to leave. It has brought diamonds to Kharkov and is expected elsewhere. The President has also invited all the leaders of the European powers to meet in the United States in order to discuss the situation and to cement borders to finalize problems within disputed spheres of influence.
Attachment: usa1871june.zip
This has been downloaded 2 time(s).
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Darius871
|
 |
Smith, Wesson, and the RODINA!!!
Mar 2002 time: 23:20
|
|
quote: Originally posted by EmuGod
There's one thing I do not understand. You saw Britain expanding in the Middle East, so why didn't you say anything? I understand that you might want Mesapotamia, but you haven't appeared to have done much to prevent any foreign expansion there. |
1) I have no problem with him taking the Levant. None at all. The reason I waited until the fall of Constantinople to announce my intentions was to show that my military has the capability to fulfill those intentions.
2) I didn't think that he would be foolish enough to attack Baghdad just one or two turns after having already taken Beirut, so I thought I had more time. If he really has, then that tells me he's expanding too quickly, which tells me a) his colonies there are poorly defended and b) he must be low on cash to facilitate such rapid expansion.
3) Most importantly: if I had said a month ago that Britain would not be allowed in Turkey or Iraq, HE WOULD HAVE ATTACKED THEM ANYWAY! He would have said 'Oh yeah? You don't have the military in the region to back you up, and Britain has been planning expansion in the Middle East for a long time' We would have been in the exact same situation as we are now. I am sure of this since they obviously had plans for the region, and because of the player. Had I claimed a long time ago, it would have made no difference in the grand scheme of things other than that my pretext might be a bit stronger.
quote: Originally posted by EmuGod
Give him Baghdad, and yo uget everything north of it. It seems like a fair compromise. |
Our position is clear. We were willing to compromise with the 4 cities I mentioned; he didn't take it.
quote: Originally posted by Kobra
Exactly my point, and exactly my proposal. But it was rejected by the war loving leader of the Germans |
If you attack Baghdad, fully knowing the consequences, history will remember that YOU were the warmongers.
quote: Originally posted by Kobra
I hope everybody understands that Britain will take out Baghdad as planned, even if it means war with the Continental Alliance. |
That's your choice, Prime Minister. An attack on Baghdad will be considered an attack on Berlin, and you will be the aggressor.
Last edited by Darius871 on 29-05-2003 at 07:40
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Eivind IV
|
 |
History will be kind to me for I intend to write it.
Aug 2002 time: 06:20
|
|
quote: I am sure of this since they obviously had plans for the region, and because of the player. Had I claimed a long time ago, it would have made no difference... |
Well, now you will never know...
quote: If you attack Baghdad, fully knowing the consequences, history will remember that YOU were the warmongers. |
If you still hold your claim for Baghdad, fully knowing the consequemces, history will remeber YOU as the warmonger. This time I personally want peace, I really do. You have totally rejectedthe , at least to me and others I have spoken to, fair peace proposal.
quote: Our position is clear. We were willing to compromise with the 4 cities I mentioned; he didn't take it. |
That is not a compromise!
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Darius871
|
 |
Smith, Wesson, and the RODINA!!!
Mar 2002 time: 23:20
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Kobra
Well, now you will never know... |
No, I do. Are you seriously saying that if I had claimed Iraq weeks ago, you would have said 'Oh sure, by all means!'? BS. This makes no difference; our paths would have crossed whether then or now.
quote: Originally posted by Kobra
If you still hold your claim for Baghdad, fully knowing the consequemces, history will remeber YOU as the warmonger. |
Well it's pointless to debate who is the 'warmonger' here, we're both going to believe what we want to believe. In my opinion, since you will be committing the first overt act if you bombard Baghdad, and are responsible for your actions. You have two choices, march on the city or not, one means war and one does not. This is YOUR choice.
quote: Originally posted by Kobra
You have totally rejectedthe , at least to me and others I have spoken to, fair peace proposal. |
Who are these 'others'? Russia is committed to our concerns both here and in private, the Americans will maintain their neutrality (in fact they've been more keen to neutrality in private than they have been on this thread), and France hasn't been vocal about this matter.
quote: Originally posted by Kobra
That is not a compromise! |
Fine then, I'm being uncompromising. This is because the Ottoman Empire is as important to me as India is to you, and I will not back down.
If I don't have room to move in the Middle East, then all other routes for expansion are by sea. Russia, British India, and the U.S. all have Oriental and Independent cities along their borders, to which they can invade by land. Since Germany is not a naval power, the Middle East is the only practical place for us to go at this time. Britain, on the other hand, is capable of going anywhere it wants on the planet because it owns the seas, and this is why the Middle East is more important to me than you. Out of character, can you at least admit you understand my strategic predicament here?
quote: Originally posted by Kobra
Still no responds? Very well then. Looks like we have a war, fellas |
That's entirely your choice. If you really want to start this thing though, you better be damn sure you can win. I don't think you can.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
EmuGod
|
|
I've been talking with both Darius and Eivind and neither will budge, it seems war is inevitable.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
EmuGod
|
|
The United States of America is now officially declaring territories around the globe that it has intentions to add to the American Empire. The United States has intentions for the following areas and will NOT tolerate foreign expansion into these areas:
Abyssinia -> Addis Ababa
Somalia -> Mogadishu
the Americas ->all cities are part of the American sphere of influence per the Monroe doctrine as mentioned earlier
Siam -> Bangkok
China -> Tsingtao (only this port city, won't take anything else)
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
JamesJKirk
|
 |
Dixon, CA USA
Jan 1970 time: 21:20
|
|
Russia on the Attack!
Rebounding from the defeat dealt to the noble Russian Navy by the British aggressors, Russian ships destroyed the British war fleet in the Aegean. The Russian economy is currently being geared to war footing, and unlike the barbaric British, the civilized Russian people are enthusiastically supporting their nation to make a bloody coup unnecessary.
President Kurkov, fresh from an emergency summit with Chancellor Bismarck, delivered an address to the Duma today condemning British belligerence and expressing unwavering support to the armed forces of Russia and those of our Continental allies. He said that this war represents the conflict of two ideals, the antiquated notions of statism and making war arbitrarily, and that of limited government, free trade on the open seas and making war only when it serves a state's strategic or economic interests.
In his speech, Kurkov also noted that he accepted the American territorial claims without reservations, and his hope that the US would join our worthy cause against the decadent British, as he is sure Canada is a thorn in America's side.
Attachment: rus1871july.zip
This has been downloaded 3 time(s).
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Darius871
|
 |
Smith, Wesson, and the RODINA!!!
Mar 2002 time: 23:20
|
|
File?
Last edited by Darius871 on 28-05-2003 at 04:59
|
|
|  |
 |
|
EmuGod
|
|
The United States will not tolerate any foreign expansion in ANY of the Americas, both north and south. These areas are under our sphere of influence and we need not occupy them for that to be so. France has no choice in the matter. You cannot hope to defeat the United States in this matter. If you persist in this attempt to further your territory in the western hemisphere, you will feel the full power of American industrial and military might. Without your allies to back you up, you have no chance of winning a war against the United States.
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:20. Apolyton Time is 00:20. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|