 |
How mush support shall be required for Mobilization to start?
This poll is closed. |
| 50% |
   |
17 |
30.91% |
| 2/3 (67% Approx.) |
   |
35 |
63.64% |
| Other Option (Specify) |
   |
3 |
5.45% |
| Don't care. |
   |
0 |
0% |
| Total: |
55 voters |
100% |
|
|  |
 |
|
Juliennew
|
|
Paris
Jun 2002 time: 06:20
|
|
Mobilization have several consequences on economy - science (can't turn it off until peace)
it should be used only in emergency cases : unexpected invasion from a powerful civ - only in the case the nation is in a danger of destruction
that's why i think a 66% of votes is more wise.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Sheik
|
|
I agree with Captain and Spiffor mobilization should require 2/3. It will be interesting to see if all the presidents decide to go for the same victory type. If one president has worked hard for a cultural victory we really need to consider the consequences before mobilizing.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Captain
|
 |
by Divine Right
May 2001 time: 00:20
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Sir Ralph
The charm of mobilization is not in this, because you can't force the city planner to change existing projects. The charm is in the fact, that you can produce military units / buildings with an increased amount of shields, similar to a GA. Mobilization is a very powerful tool, if the Empire is in need. My vote is: 50% is enough. |
Sir Ralph, the difficulty comes because when the current city project is completed, the city planner cannot construct anything except for military units and military buildings when in mobilization. That means, no new temples, cathedrals, marketplaces, courthouses, etc... which can really help with happiness if war weariness kicks in. Short wars where ww is not a factor, will likely only exist if we are already dominant (thus, not needing mobilization). But a long war where we mobilize may hamstring us as we fall behind in infrastructure. Mobilizing means we can't build certain wonders either and over a long period that could negate having a tech lead as well.
Deciding whether the empire is truly in need of mobilizing is something we would have to consider very carefully before doing as it is very difficult to get out of.
It may have charm, but it is tool that can hurt us as much as it helps.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Vlad Antlerkov
|
 |
Do you have Matt Stairs in your house?
Mar 1999 time: 23:20
|
|
Other-- 60%.
Trevman-- Yes, we need a majority in Congress to formally declare war. On the other hand, since warmaking powers were given to the executive branch in the Constitution, the President can have the military inavde some country or other and call it something else-- "police action," for example-- and avoid a Congressional vote.
The last time America formally declared war on any nation, IIRC, was December 11, 1941 (on Germany). Since then, we've had several wars-- Korea, Vietnam, Persian Gulf, etc.-- and no declarations of war.
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:20. Apolyton Time is 00:20. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|