 |
|
asleepathewheel
|
|
listening too long to one song
Mar 2002 time: 00:20
|
|
So really the problem was that Tibi failed to recognize the +1 move? thus not defending the insertion city as well as he should have? Shuffling defenders primarily to the cities he thought would be attacked, not realizing another was susceptible? Thus there was only a token defense in place, not enough to counter a transport of marines?
How many units were defending this city verses the northern cities? A substantial difference?
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Hot_Enamel
|
 |
Melbourne, Australia
Aug 2002 time: 14:20
|
|
vxma1:
I had, for a long time, always had ships along (and in) Tibi's border.
When transports became available, I moved empty stacks of them along his border. At one stage, there was a stack of 7-8 transports.
I was intentionally doing this so that Tibi would get "used to" seeing harmless stacks of transports sailing around his border.
As soon as I had amphibious warfare and enough marines, I loaded them on transports and moved them into position. Then I attacked the very next turn.
Only Tibi can say if he was worried or not.
I dont think anyone in this PBEM has built a bomber yet.
I had 4 transports that could attack Asyut.
I also had a stack of 3 empty transports further North near our border. I was hoping this would also convince Tibi that if I was to attack, the invasion point would be further North.
asleepathewheel:
I did not investigate Asyut before I attacked.
Perhaps if I did, maybe I would of waited for more marines.
I would of thought 2 infantrymen is a pretty good defense. I was expecting only 1 of course. Tibi had a wall of units along his entire coast to stop an invasion for a long time. I was hoping that wall was still there, and his cities were left with only minimal defenses.
For the record:
My first marine killed his first infantryman outright.
It only took 5 more marines to kill the second infantryman.
Tibi did get bad RNG results on the marine invasion.
But then I lost a lot of cav trying to take New Thebes.
Did Tibi not take into account the +1 move for Magellans?
He will have to answer that. I suspect he did not.
And it was the only reason why I was able to pull this off and reach Asyut.
And a question from me:
Tibi, I thought Asyut was covered by a radar tower ?
Radar towers dont have to be right next to the city right?
They can be 2 tiles away ?
RxC
Regs.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
MattPilot
|
|
Tulsa, OK
Dec 2003 time: 05:20
|
|
so how many units in total did you lose during the total operation?
Don't know if this were possible in your case, but i'd probably would of kept one small insignificant city, garrison my remaining units in there, and let the enemy lose a couple of his men to it. I know i'd try to take it back, cause i'd be pretty pissed off 
IF he couldn't take it back, you got a nice future outpost to launch operations from (rush a airport or something). If he does try to take it back though, you can assume (depending on your spy reports & by the numbers he would send into your territory), that the boarder cities have reduced strengths to fight for the captured city. So in the next turn, you could launch a land invasion across the boarder. Though only if he doesn't launch a counter attack across the boarder himself. However, if he doesn't have enough units to guard all his cities in the first place, how will he counter attack & gaurd his remaining cities ( a basic spy report would be useful here) ? And another guess here is, that if he does decide to counterattack across the boarder, the probability of a counterattack on the only remaining 'captured' city is unlikely, so a rushed airport wouldn't do to much harm 
Just som thoughts.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Risa
|
|
There's no C3C one year ago.
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:20. Apolyton Time is 00:20. |
top of page
|
|
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|